David Crosbie, Josta Barton, Angaj Ghosh, Barbara Hayes, Daryl Jones
{"title":"一家大都市教学医院启动无益蓝色代码的频率和潜在原因。","authors":"David Crosbie, Josta Barton, Angaj Ghosh, Barbara Hayes, Daryl Jones","doi":"10.1111/imj.16487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Code Blue activations in patients who are not for resuscitation (NFR) may be regarded as non-beneficial and may cause harm to patients, relatives and hospital staff.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To estimate the prevalence of non-beneficial Code Blue calls in a metropolitan teaching hospital and identify modifiable factors that could be utilised to reduce these events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study consisted of two parts: (i) a retrospective analysis of all Code Blue activations over a 12-month period using prospectively collected data. Non-beneficial activations were defined as calls made in patients with a NFR order in either the current or any previous hospital admissions and (ii) an anonymous voluntary survey of staff who were present at a Code Blue activation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 186 Code Blue activations over the study period, with 48 (25.8%) defined as non-beneficial. Such patients had more comorbidities, previous hospitalisations and greater levels of frailty. Most non-beneficial calls occurred on general wards and more than three-quarters of patients had been reviewed by a consultant prior to the call. The survey determined that despite ward staff having a considerable degree of resuscitation experience, there were deficiencies in understanding of Code Blue criteria, the resuscitation status of patients under their care and the interpretation of goals of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Over a quarter of Code Blue calls were deemed non-beneficial. Improving the visibility of NFR status and staff understanding of patient goals of care are needed, along with timely, proactive documentation of NFR status by experienced clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"54 10","pages":"1713-1718"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and potential causes of non-beneficial Code Blue activations at a metropolitan teaching hospital\",\"authors\":\"David Crosbie, Josta Barton, Angaj Ghosh, Barbara Hayes, Daryl Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.16487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Code Blue activations in patients who are not for resuscitation (NFR) may be regarded as non-beneficial and may cause harm to patients, relatives and hospital staff.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To estimate the prevalence of non-beneficial Code Blue calls in a metropolitan teaching hospital and identify modifiable factors that could be utilised to reduce these events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study consisted of two parts: (i) a retrospective analysis of all Code Blue activations over a 12-month period using prospectively collected data. Non-beneficial activations were defined as calls made in patients with a NFR order in either the current or any previous hospital admissions and (ii) an anonymous voluntary survey of staff who were present at a Code Blue activation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 186 Code Blue activations over the study period, with 48 (25.8%) defined as non-beneficial. Such patients had more comorbidities, previous hospitalisations and greater levels of frailty. Most non-beneficial calls occurred on general wards and more than three-quarters of patients had been reviewed by a consultant prior to the call. The survey determined that despite ward staff having a considerable degree of resuscitation experience, there were deficiencies in understanding of Code Blue criteria, the resuscitation status of patients under their care and the interpretation of goals of care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Over a quarter of Code Blue calls were deemed non-beneficial. Improving the visibility of NFR status and staff understanding of patient goals of care are needed, along with timely, proactive documentation of NFR status by experienced clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"1713-1718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequency and potential causes of non-beneficial Code Blue activations at a metropolitan teaching hospital
Background
Code Blue activations in patients who are not for resuscitation (NFR) may be regarded as non-beneficial and may cause harm to patients, relatives and hospital staff.
Aims
To estimate the prevalence of non-beneficial Code Blue calls in a metropolitan teaching hospital and identify modifiable factors that could be utilised to reduce these events.
Methods
The study consisted of two parts: (i) a retrospective analysis of all Code Blue activations over a 12-month period using prospectively collected data. Non-beneficial activations were defined as calls made in patients with a NFR order in either the current or any previous hospital admissions and (ii) an anonymous voluntary survey of staff who were present at a Code Blue activation.
Results
There were 186 Code Blue activations over the study period, with 48 (25.8%) defined as non-beneficial. Such patients had more comorbidities, previous hospitalisations and greater levels of frailty. Most non-beneficial calls occurred on general wards and more than three-quarters of patients had been reviewed by a consultant prior to the call. The survey determined that despite ward staff having a considerable degree of resuscitation experience, there were deficiencies in understanding of Code Blue criteria, the resuscitation status of patients under their care and the interpretation of goals of care.
Conclusions
Over a quarter of Code Blue calls were deemed non-beneficial. Improving the visibility of NFR status and staff understanding of patient goals of care are needed, along with timely, proactive documentation of NFR status by experienced clinicians.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.