培养角膜内皮细胞移植治疗富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良症后的角膜内皮形态。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY JAMA ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2718
Yasufumi Tomioka, Morio Ueno, Akihisa Yamamoto, Kohsaku Numa, Hiroshi Tanaka, Koji Kitazawa, Munetoyo Toda, Noriko Koizumi, Motomu Tanaka, Junji Hamuro, Chie Sotozono, Shigeru Kinoshita
{"title":"培养角膜内皮细胞移植治疗富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良症后的角膜内皮形态。","authors":"Yasufumi Tomioka, Morio Ueno, Akihisa Yamamoto, Kohsaku Numa, Hiroshi Tanaka, Koji Kitazawa, Munetoyo Toda, Noriko Koizumi, Motomu Tanaka, Junji Hamuro, Chie Sotozono, Shigeru Kinoshita","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Whether guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) can be removed by polishing without Descemet stripping and whether postoperative maintenance of reduced guttae can be achieved through cultured corneal endothelial cell (CEC) transplant therapy are critical issues to be addressed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the decrease of guttae through polishing degenerated CECs and abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM) without Descemet stripping and to observe the behavior of guttae following cultured CEC transplant.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This case series prospective observational study was conducted in a hospital outpatient clinic setting. Between December 2013 and January 2019, 22 eyes with corneal endothelial failure caused by FECD received cultured CEC transplant therapy at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital. Of these, 15 eyes were consistently monitored at the same central corneal area during the preoperative phase, as well as in the early (within 1 year) and late (after 3 years) postoperative phases. The images from these phases were categorized into 3 groups: typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Cultured CEC transplant therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Proportion of guttae in the observable area was measured, comparing the early and late postoperative phases for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (range, 49-79 years). All 15 eyes exhibited the presence of confluent guttae preoperatively (100%). Among these, 3 of 15 eyes belonged to male patients. The early postoperative phase of guttae morphologies was classified into 3 groups: 5 eyes with typical guttae, 7 with atypical guttae, and 3 with no guttae. The decrease in the number of these guttae was achieved by surgical procedures. The median percentage of guttae in the typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae groups was 41.8%, 44.4%, and 16.2%, respectively, in the early phase, and 42.2%, 38.2%, and 18.8%, respectively, in the late phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings demonstrate that in some cases of FECD, guttae can be removed by scraping and polishing abnormal ECM and degenerated CECs, while preserving the Descemet membrane. Furthermore, cultured CEC transplant resulted in no increase in guttae for up to 3 years, providing insights into surgically eliminating guttae.</p>","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"818-826"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guttae Morphology After Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cell Transplant in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.\",\"authors\":\"Yasufumi Tomioka, Morio Ueno, Akihisa Yamamoto, Kohsaku Numa, Hiroshi Tanaka, Koji Kitazawa, Munetoyo Toda, Noriko Koizumi, Motomu Tanaka, Junji Hamuro, Chie Sotozono, Shigeru Kinoshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Whether guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) can be removed by polishing without Descemet stripping and whether postoperative maintenance of reduced guttae can be achieved through cultured corneal endothelial cell (CEC) transplant therapy are critical issues to be addressed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the decrease of guttae through polishing degenerated CECs and abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM) without Descemet stripping and to observe the behavior of guttae following cultured CEC transplant.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This case series prospective observational study was conducted in a hospital outpatient clinic setting. Between December 2013 and January 2019, 22 eyes with corneal endothelial failure caused by FECD received cultured CEC transplant therapy at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital. Of these, 15 eyes were consistently monitored at the same central corneal area during the preoperative phase, as well as in the early (within 1 year) and late (after 3 years) postoperative phases. The images from these phases were categorized into 3 groups: typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Cultured CEC transplant therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Proportion of guttae in the observable area was measured, comparing the early and late postoperative phases for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (range, 49-79 years). All 15 eyes exhibited the presence of confluent guttae preoperatively (100%). Among these, 3 of 15 eyes belonged to male patients. The early postoperative phase of guttae morphologies was classified into 3 groups: 5 eyes with typical guttae, 7 with atypical guttae, and 3 with no guttae. The decrease in the number of these guttae was achieved by surgical procedures. The median percentage of guttae in the typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae groups was 41.8%, 44.4%, and 16.2%, respectively, in the early phase, and 42.2%, 38.2%, and 18.8%, respectively, in the late phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings demonstrate that in some cases of FECD, guttae can be removed by scraping and polishing abnormal ECM and degenerated CECs, while preserving the Descemet membrane. Furthermore, cultured CEC transplant resulted in no increase in guttae for up to 3 years, providing insights into surgically eliminating guttae.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"818-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2718\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:福氏内皮角膜营养不良症(Fuchs endothelial corne dystrophy,FECD)患者的角膜胶质是否可以通过抛光去除,而无需进行Descemet剥离,以及是否可以通过培养角膜内皮细胞(CEC)移植疗法实现术后维持减少的角膜胶质,这些都是亟待解决的关键问题:研究在不进行Descemet剥离的情况下,通过打磨变性的CEC和异常细胞外基质(ECM)来减少角膜基质,并观察培养的CEC移植后角膜基质的变化:本病例系列前瞻性观察研究在医院门诊进行。2013年12月至2019年1月期间,京都府立大学医院共收治了22例因FECD导致角膜内皮功能衰竭的患者。其中,15 只眼睛在术前阶段、术后早期(1 年内)和晚期(3 年后)在同一角膜中心区域接受了持续监测。这些阶段的图像被分为三组:典型角膜钙化、非典型角膜钙化和无角膜钙化:主要结果:主要结果:对各组术后早期和晚期进行比较,测量可观察区域的肠管比例:患者手术时的平均年龄为 69 岁(49-79 岁)。所有 15 只眼睛在术前都出现了融合性牙石(100%)。其中,男性患者占 15 眼中的 3 眼。术后早期的肠管形态分为三组:5 只眼睛有典型肠管,7 只眼睛有非典型肠管,3 只眼睛没有肠管。通过外科手术减少了这些钩突的数量。在早期阶段,典型钩突组、非典型钩突组和无钩突组的钩突百分比中位数分别为 41.8%、44.4% 和 16.2%,而在晚期阶段则分别为 42.2%、38.2% 和 18.8%:研究结果表明,在某些 FECD 病例中,可以通过刮除和抛光异常 ECM 和变性的 CEC 来去除胶质,同时保留 Descemet 膜。此外,培养的 CEC 移植后,在长达 3 年的时间里钩突没有增加,这为通过手术消除钩突提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guttae Morphology After Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cell Transplant in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Importance: Whether guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) can be removed by polishing without Descemet stripping and whether postoperative maintenance of reduced guttae can be achieved through cultured corneal endothelial cell (CEC) transplant therapy are critical issues to be addressed.

Objective: To investigate the decrease of guttae through polishing degenerated CECs and abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM) without Descemet stripping and to observe the behavior of guttae following cultured CEC transplant.

Design, setting, and participants: This case series prospective observational study was conducted in a hospital outpatient clinic setting. Between December 2013 and January 2019, 22 eyes with corneal endothelial failure caused by FECD received cultured CEC transplant therapy at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital. Of these, 15 eyes were consistently monitored at the same central corneal area during the preoperative phase, as well as in the early (within 1 year) and late (after 3 years) postoperative phases. The images from these phases were categorized into 3 groups: typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae.

Exposures: Cultured CEC transplant therapy.

Main outcomes: Proportion of guttae in the observable area was measured, comparing the early and late postoperative phases for each group.

Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (range, 49-79 years). All 15 eyes exhibited the presence of confluent guttae preoperatively (100%). Among these, 3 of 15 eyes belonged to male patients. The early postoperative phase of guttae morphologies was classified into 3 groups: 5 eyes with typical guttae, 7 with atypical guttae, and 3 with no guttae. The decrease in the number of these guttae was achieved by surgical procedures. The median percentage of guttae in the typical guttae, atypical guttae, and no guttae groups was 41.8%, 44.4%, and 16.2%, respectively, in the early phase, and 42.2%, 38.2%, and 18.8%, respectively, in the late phase.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings demonstrate that in some cases of FECD, guttae can be removed by scraping and polishing abnormal ECM and degenerated CECs, while preserving the Descemet membrane. Furthermore, cultured CEC transplant resulted in no increase in guttae for up to 3 years, providing insights into surgically eliminating guttae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Viral Meningoencephalitis and Bilateral Blurry Vision Negative Treponemal Serologies in Syphilitic Panuveitis Implications of Diagnostic Error in Ocular Surface Disease: The Role of Anchoring and Ambiguous Diagnostic Terminology. Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Populations of African Descent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1