Ms Yee Kay Lai , Ms Michelle Wong , Lauren Kearney , Nigel Lee
{"title":"产前催眠培训对分娩过程中使用药物镇痛的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Ms Yee Kay Lai , Ms Michelle Wong , Lauren Kearney , Nigel Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of hypnosis as a means of pain management during labour is becoming increasingly popular. While recent reviews have reported on pain perception, relaxation and other psychological benefits the impact of hypnosis on the use of pharmacological analgesia use has not been specifically examined.</p></div><div><h3>Question</h3><p>For women in labour at term, does antenatal hypnosis instruction compared to no instruction result in decreased use of pharmacological analgesia and influence maternal and infant birth outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were searched with dates ranging from 1947-2024. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared antenatal hypnosis training to no hypnosis control groups, published in English and reported on pharmacological analgesia use. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 for RCTs was used to assess design quality. Study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent researchers.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n=2937). The use of hypnosis did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of epidural use (RR. 0.79 95% CI 0.39-1.61) or other forms of pharmacological analgesia. Factors such as blinding of care providers to the participants allocated group may have reduced the chances of successful use of hypnosis. Variations in the presentation of hypnosis between studies may also impact on outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and Conclusion</h3><p>This review reports no effect on the use of pharmacological analgesia in women trained in hypnosis antenatally compared with those who were not. Our review does highlight several RCT design characteristics that could impact on the measurement and analysis of the use and efficacy of hypnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001967/pdfft?md5=ea39a0ca7d8ce528051f1549bdcd1e13&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824001967-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of antenatal hypnosis training on pharmacological analgesia use during labour and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ms Yee Kay Lai , Ms Michelle Wong , Lauren Kearney , Nigel Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of hypnosis as a means of pain management during labour is becoming increasingly popular. While recent reviews have reported on pain perception, relaxation and other psychological benefits the impact of hypnosis on the use of pharmacological analgesia use has not been specifically examined.</p></div><div><h3>Question</h3><p>For women in labour at term, does antenatal hypnosis instruction compared to no instruction result in decreased use of pharmacological analgesia and influence maternal and infant birth outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were searched with dates ranging from 1947-2024. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared antenatal hypnosis training to no hypnosis control groups, published in English and reported on pharmacological analgesia use. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 for RCTs was used to assess design quality. Study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent researchers.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n=2937). The use of hypnosis did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of epidural use (RR. 0.79 95% CI 0.39-1.61) or other forms of pharmacological analgesia. Factors such as blinding of care providers to the participants allocated group may have reduced the chances of successful use of hypnosis. Variations in the presentation of hypnosis between studies may also impact on outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and Conclusion</h3><p>This review reports no effect on the use of pharmacological analgesia in women trained in hypnosis antenatally compared with those who were not. Our review does highlight several RCT design characteristics that could impact on the measurement and analysis of the use and efficacy of hypnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001967/pdfft?md5=ea39a0ca7d8ce528051f1549bdcd1e13&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824001967-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001967\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在分娩过程中使用催眠作为镇痛手段正变得越来越流行。虽然最近的一些综述报道了催眠对疼痛的感知、放松和其他心理益处,但催眠对药物镇痛使用的影响尚未得到专门研究:问题:对于足月分娩的产妇,产前催眠指导与不进行催眠指导相比,是否会减少药物镇痛的使用,并对母婴分娩结局产生影响:方法:对 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Embase 等数据库进行了检索,检索日期为 1947-2024 年。我们纳入了将产前催眠训练与无催眠对照组进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验均以英语发表,并报告了药物镇痛的使用情况。采用 Cochrane 的 RCT 偏倚风险 2 评估设计质量。研究选择、质量评估、数据提取和分析由两名独立研究人员进行:六项研究符合纳入标准(n=2937)。催眠的使用并未显著降低硬膜外麻醉(RR. 0.79 95% CI 0.39-1.61)或其他形式药物镇痛的风险。护理提供者对参与者分配的组别设置盲区等因素可能会降低成功使用催眠的几率。不同研究中催眠方法的不同也可能会影响研究结果:本综述报告显示,与未接受产前催眠培训的妇女相比,接受催眠培训的妇女在使用药物镇痛方面没有受到影响。我们的综述确实强调了可能会对催眠的使用和疗效的测量与分析产生影响的几项 RCT 设计特征。
The effect of antenatal hypnosis training on pharmacological analgesia use during labour and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
The use of hypnosis as a means of pain management during labour is becoming increasingly popular. While recent reviews have reported on pain perception, relaxation and other psychological benefits the impact of hypnosis on the use of pharmacological analgesia use has not been specifically examined.
Question
For women in labour at term, does antenatal hypnosis instruction compared to no instruction result in decreased use of pharmacological analgesia and influence maternal and infant birth outcomes.
Methods
Databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were searched with dates ranging from 1947-2024. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared antenatal hypnosis training to no hypnosis control groups, published in English and reported on pharmacological analgesia use. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 for RCTs was used to assess design quality. Study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent researchers.
Findings
Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n=2937). The use of hypnosis did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of epidural use (RR. 0.79 95% CI 0.39-1.61) or other forms of pharmacological analgesia. Factors such as blinding of care providers to the participants allocated group may have reduced the chances of successful use of hypnosis. Variations in the presentation of hypnosis between studies may also impact on outcomes.
Discussion and Conclusion
This review reports no effect on the use of pharmacological analgesia in women trained in hypnosis antenatally compared with those who were not. Our review does highlight several RCT design characteristics that could impact on the measurement and analysis of the use and efficacy of hypnosis.