中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值在预测骨科手术后感染中的诊断价值:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Surgical infections Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1089/sur.2024.002
Zhan Peng, Yukun Jia, Jin Li, Guangye Wang
{"title":"中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值在预测骨科手术后感染中的诊断价值:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Zhan Peng, Yukun Jia, Jin Li, Guangye Wang","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in determining infection after orthopedic surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify relevant studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Data extraction was performed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and other indicators. Bivariate mixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software. The sources of heterogeneity were evaluated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 16 literatures comprising 18 studies involving 3737 patients were included in this analysis. NLR demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.69) in diagnosing orthopedic post-operative infection, with an area under the curve of 0.80 and diagnostic odds ratio of 7.76. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, primarily due to variations in surgical type, infection type, blood test timing, and NLR cutoff value. Fagan nomogram indicated that NLR could increase the positive posterior probability to 72% and decrease the negative posterior probability to 25%. The pooled effect of the likelihood ratio dot plot for diagnosis fell in the lower right quadrant. Deek funnel plot suggested no publication bias in this study. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NLR holds certain value in diagnosing infection after orthopedic surgery and can provide additional information to assess the risk of infection. However, its predictive performance is influenced by various factors, and it cannot be used as a sole criterion for confirming the diagnosis. Prospective studies should be conducted in the future to optimize the diagnostic threshold and explore its combination with other indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Post-Operative Infection after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhan Peng, Yukun Jia, Jin Li, Guangye Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in determining infection after orthopedic surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify relevant studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Data extraction was performed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and other indicators. Bivariate mixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software. The sources of heterogeneity were evaluated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 16 literatures comprising 18 studies involving 3737 patients were included in this analysis. NLR demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.69) in diagnosing orthopedic post-operative infection, with an area under the curve of 0.80 and diagnostic odds ratio of 7.76. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, primarily due to variations in surgical type, infection type, blood test timing, and NLR cutoff value. Fagan nomogram indicated that NLR could increase the positive posterior probability to 72% and decrease the negative posterior probability to 25%. The pooled effect of the likelihood ratio dot plot for diagnosis fell in the lower right quadrant. Deek funnel plot suggested no publication bias in this study. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NLR holds certain value in diagnosing infection after orthopedic surgery and can provide additional information to assess the risk of infection. However, its predictive performance is influenced by various factors, and it cannot be used as a sole criterion for confirming the diagnosis. Prospective studies should be conducted in the future to optimize the diagnostic threshold and explore its combination with other indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对骨科手术后感染的预测价值。方法在 PubMed、EBASE、CNKI 和万方数据库中进行全面检索,以确定相关研究。使用 QUADAS-2 对纳入研究的质量进行评估。进行数据提取以计算灵敏度、特异性和其他指标。使用 Stata 软件进行双变量混合效应荟萃分析。对异质性来源进行了评估,并生成了接收者操作特征曲线。分析结果本次分析共纳入了 16 篇文献,包括 18 项研究,涉及 3737 名患者。NLR 在诊断骨科术后感染方面表现出中等的敏感性(0.77)和特异性(0.69),曲线下面积为 0.80,诊断几率比为 7.76。研究之间存在显著的异质性,主要是由于手术类型、感染类型、血液检测时间和 NLR 临界值的不同。Fagan提名图显示,NLR可将阳性后验概率提高到72%,将阴性后验概率降低到25%。诊断似然比点图的集合效应位于右下象限。Deek漏斗图显示本研究无发表偏倚。结论NLR 在诊断骨科手术后感染方面具有一定价值,可为评估感染风险提供额外信息。但其预测性能受多种因素影响,不能作为确诊的唯一标准。今后应开展前瞻性研究,以优化诊断阈值并探索其与其他指标的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Post-Operative Infection after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in determining infection after orthopedic surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify relevant studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Data extraction was performed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and other indicators. Bivariate mixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software. The sources of heterogeneity were evaluated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. Results: A total of 16 literatures comprising 18 studies involving 3737 patients were included in this analysis. NLR demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.69) in diagnosing orthopedic post-operative infection, with an area under the curve of 0.80 and diagnostic odds ratio of 7.76. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, primarily due to variations in surgical type, infection type, blood test timing, and NLR cutoff value. Fagan nomogram indicated that NLR could increase the positive posterior probability to 72% and decrease the negative posterior probability to 25%. The pooled effect of the likelihood ratio dot plot for diagnosis fell in the lower right quadrant. Deek funnel plot suggested no publication bias in this study. Conclusion: NLR holds certain value in diagnosing infection after orthopedic surgery and can provide additional information to assess the risk of infection. However, its predictive performance is influenced by various factors, and it cannot be used as a sole criterion for confirming the diagnosis. Prospective studies should be conducted in the future to optimize the diagnostic threshold and explore its combination with other indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
期刊最新文献
Spectrum of Pathogens in Surgical Site Infections after Sarcoma Resection in the Peri-Pelvic and Pelvic Region. Distinct Location, Distinct Infection? Surgical Management of Complicated Thoracic Fungal Infections: A Case Series from a Tertiary Referral Center. A Retrospective Exploration of Pre-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin in Cesarean Sections: Implications for Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery. Adherence to Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Guidelines in Endourologic Procedures: Frequency and Related Outcomes. Ampicillin-Sulbactam for Carbapenem-Susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia: A Case for High-Dose, Continuous Infusion Dosing Strategy in the Trauma ICU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1