Fiona Aanesen, Rigmor C Berg, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Benedicte Mohr, Karin Proper, Lars-Kristian Lunde
{"title":"工作年龄人口的就业与心理健康:纵向研究系统性回顾协议。","authors":"Fiona Aanesen, Rigmor C Berg, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Benedicte Mohr, Karin Proper, Lars-Kristian Lunde","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02613-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Employment provides economic security, a social network, and is important for self-identity. A review published by van der Noordt and colleagues in 2014 showed that employment was beneficial for depression and general mental health. However, an updated synthesis including research published in the last decade is lacking. In the planned review, we aim to update, critically assess, and synthesise the current evidence of the association between paid employment (excluding precarious employment) and common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and psychological distress) among the working age population in the labour force.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will follow recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) will be searched from 2012, using appropriate MeSH terms and text words related to our inclusion criteria. We will screen the records against predefined eligibility criteria, first by title and abstract using the priority screening function in EPPI-Reviewer, before proceeding to full-text screening. Only studies investigating the longitudinal relationship between employment and common mental health outcomes will be included. We will search for grey literature in OpenAlex and conduct backward and forward citation searches of included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). We will conduct a narrative review and, if possible following pre-set criteria, conduct random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effect of employment on depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, across the included studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An updated review of the association between non-precarious employment and mental health outcomes is needed. In the planned review, we will assess the quality of the included studies and synthesise the results across studies to make them easily accessible to policy makers and researchers. The results from the review can be used to aid in policy decisions and guide future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023405919.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11274751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment and mental health in the working age population: a protocol for a systematic review of longitudinal studies.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Aanesen, Rigmor C Berg, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Benedicte Mohr, Karin Proper, Lars-Kristian Lunde\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02613-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Employment provides economic security, a social network, and is important for self-identity. A review published by van der Noordt and colleagues in 2014 showed that employment was beneficial for depression and general mental health. However, an updated synthesis including research published in the last decade is lacking. In the planned review, we aim to update, critically assess, and synthesise the current evidence of the association between paid employment (excluding precarious employment) and common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and psychological distress) among the working age population in the labour force.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will follow recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) will be searched from 2012, using appropriate MeSH terms and text words related to our inclusion criteria. We will screen the records against predefined eligibility criteria, first by title and abstract using the priority screening function in EPPI-Reviewer, before proceeding to full-text screening. Only studies investigating the longitudinal relationship between employment and common mental health outcomes will be included. We will search for grey literature in OpenAlex and conduct backward and forward citation searches of included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). We will conduct a narrative review and, if possible following pre-set criteria, conduct random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effect of employment on depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, across the included studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An updated review of the association between non-precarious employment and mental health outcomes is needed. In the planned review, we will assess the quality of the included studies and synthesise the results across studies to make them easily accessible to policy makers and researchers. The results from the review can be used to aid in policy decisions and guide future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023405919.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11274751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02613-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02613-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:就业可提供经济保障和社交网络,对自我认同也很重要。van der Noordt及其同事在2014年发表的一篇综述显示,就业有利于抑郁症和一般心理健康。然而,目前还缺乏包括过去十年间发表的研究在内的最新综述。在计划进行的综述中,我们旨在更新、批判性评估和综合当前关于有偿就业(不包括不稳定就业)与劳动适龄人口常见心理健康结果(抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰)之间关系的证据:方法:我们将遵循建议的指南来开展和报告系统性综述。从 2012 年开始,我们将使用与纳入标准相关的适当 MeSH 术语和文本词对四个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、APA PsycINFO 和 Web of Science)进行检索。我们将根据预定义的资格标准筛选记录,首先使用 EPPI-Reviewer 中的优先筛选功能按标题和摘要进行筛选,然后再进行全文筛选。只有调查就业与常见心理健康结果之间纵向关系的研究才会被纳入。我们将在 OpenAlex 中搜索灰色文献,并对纳入的研究进行前后引文检索。我们将使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 (RoB 2)、非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险 (ROBINS-I) 或纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表 (NOS) 对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。我们将进行叙述性综述,并在可能的情况下按照预先设定的标准进行随机效应荟萃分析,以估算纳入研究的就业对抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰的总体影响:讨论:需要对非临时性就业与心理健康结果之间的关系进行最新综述。在计划进行的综述中,我们将对纳入研究的质量进行评估,并对各项研究的结果进行综合,以便于政策制定者和研究人员使用。综述结果可用于辅助政策决策和指导未来的研究重点:系统综述注册:prospero crd42023405919。
Employment and mental health in the working age population: a protocol for a systematic review of longitudinal studies.
Background: Employment provides economic security, a social network, and is important for self-identity. A review published by van der Noordt and colleagues in 2014 showed that employment was beneficial for depression and general mental health. However, an updated synthesis including research published in the last decade is lacking. In the planned review, we aim to update, critically assess, and synthesise the current evidence of the association between paid employment (excluding precarious employment) and common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and psychological distress) among the working age population in the labour force.
Methods: We will follow recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) will be searched from 2012, using appropriate MeSH terms and text words related to our inclusion criteria. We will screen the records against predefined eligibility criteria, first by title and abstract using the priority screening function in EPPI-Reviewer, before proceeding to full-text screening. Only studies investigating the longitudinal relationship between employment and common mental health outcomes will be included. We will search for grey literature in OpenAlex and conduct backward and forward citation searches of included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). We will conduct a narrative review and, if possible following pre-set criteria, conduct random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effect of employment on depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, across the included studies.
Discussion: An updated review of the association between non-precarious employment and mental health outcomes is needed. In the planned review, we will assess the quality of the included studies and synthesise the results across studies to make them easily accessible to policy makers and researchers. The results from the review can be used to aid in policy decisions and guide future research priorities.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.