在工作台装置中使用机械呼吸机测量肺漏气的特性。

Q3 Engineering Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1080/03091902.2024.2381540
Bob P Hermans, Jeroen L M van Doorn, Lisanne H Roesthuis, Jan Hofland, Wilson W L Li, Daniël I M van Dort, Erik H F M van der Heijden, Harry van Goor, Ad F T M Verhagen
{"title":"在工作台装置中使用机械呼吸机测量肺漏气的特性。","authors":"Bob P Hermans, Jeroen L M van Doorn, Lisanne H Roesthuis, Jan Hofland, Wilson W L Li, Daniël I M van Dort, Erik H F M van der Heijden, Harry van Goor, Ad F T M Verhagen","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2024.2381540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged air leakage (AL) following pulmonary resections leads to prolonged hospital stay and post-operative complications. Intra- and postoperative quantification of AL might be useful for improving treatment decisions, but these measurements have not been characterised. AL calculations based on inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were investigated in an Intensive Care Unit mechanical ventilator circuit (Servo-I). AL was also measured by a digital chest drainage system. This study shows that AL measurements increase in accuracy when corrected for baseline deviations (R: 0.904 > 0.997, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a funnel-shape, indicative of a detection threshhold. Corrected measurements were most accurate when averaged over five breaths and AL was >500 mL/min, with an estimated mean systemic bias of 7.4% (95%-limits of agreement [LoA]: 1.1%-13.7%) at 500 mL/min air leak. Breath-by-breath analysis showed most accurate results at AL >20 mL/breath (R: 0.989-0.991, <i>p</i> < 0.001) at tidal volumes between 350-600 mL. The digital drain had a mean systemic bias of -11.1% (95%-LoA: -18.9% to -3.3%) with homogenous scatter in Bland-Altman analysis and a strong correlation to the control measurement over a large range (0-2000mL/min, R: 0.999, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This study indicates that the Servo-I can be used for air leak quantification in clinically relevant ranges (>500 mL/min), but is unsuited for small leak detection due to a detection threshold. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of varying accuracy and interoperability characteristics between AL measurement devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterisation of pulmonary air leak measurements using a mechanical ventilator in a bench setup.\",\"authors\":\"Bob P Hermans, Jeroen L M van Doorn, Lisanne H Roesthuis, Jan Hofland, Wilson W L Li, Daniël I M van Dort, Erik H F M van der Heijden, Harry van Goor, Ad F T M Verhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03091902.2024.2381540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prolonged air leakage (AL) following pulmonary resections leads to prolonged hospital stay and post-operative complications. Intra- and postoperative quantification of AL might be useful for improving treatment decisions, but these measurements have not been characterised. AL calculations based on inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were investigated in an Intensive Care Unit mechanical ventilator circuit (Servo-I). AL was also measured by a digital chest drainage system. This study shows that AL measurements increase in accuracy when corrected for baseline deviations (R: 0.904 > 0.997, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a funnel-shape, indicative of a detection threshhold. Corrected measurements were most accurate when averaged over five breaths and AL was >500 mL/min, with an estimated mean systemic bias of 7.4% (95%-limits of agreement [LoA]: 1.1%-13.7%) at 500 mL/min air leak. Breath-by-breath analysis showed most accurate results at AL >20 mL/breath (R: 0.989-0.991, <i>p</i> < 0.001) at tidal volumes between 350-600 mL. The digital drain had a mean systemic bias of -11.1% (95%-LoA: -18.9% to -3.3%) with homogenous scatter in Bland-Altman analysis and a strong correlation to the control measurement over a large range (0-2000mL/min, R: 0.999, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This study indicates that the Servo-I can be used for air leak quantification in clinically relevant ranges (>500 mL/min), but is unsuited for small leak detection due to a detection threshold. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of varying accuracy and interoperability characteristics between AL measurement devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2381540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2381540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺切除术后长时间漏气(AL)会导致住院时间延长和术后并发症。术中和术后对 AL 进行量化可能有助于改进治疗决策,但这些测量方法尚未得到证实。我们在重症监护室机械呼吸机回路(Servo-I)中对基于吸气和呼气潮气量的 AL 计算进行了研究。数字胸腔引流系统也对 AL 进行了测量。该研究表明,当校正基线偏差(R:0.904 > 0.997,p 500 mL/min,估计平均系统偏差为 7.4%(95%-limits of agreement [LoA]:1.1%-13.7%),漏气量为 500 mL/min 时,AL 测量的准确性增加。逐次呼吸分析在 AL >20 mL/breath 时显示出最准确的结果(R:0.989-0.991,p p 500 mL/min),但由于检测阈值的原因,不适用于小漏气检测。研究人员和临床医生应注意 AL 测量设备之间不同的准确性和互操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterisation of pulmonary air leak measurements using a mechanical ventilator in a bench setup.

Prolonged air leakage (AL) following pulmonary resections leads to prolonged hospital stay and post-operative complications. Intra- and postoperative quantification of AL might be useful for improving treatment decisions, but these measurements have not been characterised. AL calculations based on inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were investigated in an Intensive Care Unit mechanical ventilator circuit (Servo-I). AL was also measured by a digital chest drainage system. This study shows that AL measurements increase in accuracy when corrected for baseline deviations (R: 0.904 > 0.997, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a funnel-shape, indicative of a detection threshhold. Corrected measurements were most accurate when averaged over five breaths and AL was >500 mL/min, with an estimated mean systemic bias of 7.4% (95%-limits of agreement [LoA]: 1.1%-13.7%) at 500 mL/min air leak. Breath-by-breath analysis showed most accurate results at AL >20 mL/breath (R: 0.989-0.991, p < 0.001) at tidal volumes between 350-600 mL. The digital drain had a mean systemic bias of -11.1% (95%-LoA: -18.9% to -3.3%) with homogenous scatter in Bland-Altman analysis and a strong correlation to the control measurement over a large range (0-2000mL/min, R: 0.999, p < 0.001). This study indicates that the Servo-I can be used for air leak quantification in clinically relevant ranges (>500 mL/min), but is unsuited for small leak detection due to a detection threshold. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of varying accuracy and interoperability characteristics between AL measurement devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.
期刊最新文献
News and product update. Safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel device to monitor ischaemic stroke patients. An enhanced Garter Snake Optimization-assisted deep learning model for lung cancer segmentation and classification using CT images. Transformative applications of additive manufacturing in biomedical engineering: bioprinting to surgical innovations. Characterisation of pulmonary air leak measurements using a mechanical ventilator in a bench setup.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1