机器人视频辅助胸腔镜手术肺癌全肺切除术的系统回顾。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.5114/kitp.2024.141147
Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza, Massimo Giuseppe Viola
{"title":"机器人视频辅助胸腔镜手术肺癌全肺切除术的系统回顾。","authors":"Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza, Massimo Giuseppe Viola","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2024.141147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in treating various lung diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of electronic databases was conducted, and 25 studies encompassing 1,650 patients were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review found that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the treatment of various lung diseases, particularly early-stage lung cancer. The surgery is associated with shorter hospitalizations, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain when compared to traditional open surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>However, long-term survival outcomes were not significantly different between robotic and open surgery. The review also highlights the need for further studies to determine the optimal use of robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery in different clinical scenarios and to determine whether the benefits of this technique outweigh the costs. Overall, this systematic review suggests that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective technique that can be used as an alternative to traditional open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery total pneumonectomy for lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza, Massimo Giuseppe Viola\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/kitp.2024.141147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in treating various lung diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of electronic databases was conducted, and 25 studies encompassing 1,650 patients were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review found that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the treatment of various lung diseases, particularly early-stage lung cancer. The surgery is associated with shorter hospitalizations, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain when compared to traditional open surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>However, long-term survival outcomes were not significantly different between robotic and open surgery. The review also highlights the need for further studies to determine the optimal use of robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery in different clinical scenarios and to determine whether the benefits of this technique outweigh the costs. Overall, this systematic review suggests that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective technique that can be used as an alternative to traditional open surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267649/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.141147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.141147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本系统综述旨在全面评估机器人视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺切除术的文献:本系统性综述旨在全面评估有关机器人视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺切除术的文献:方法:对电子数据库进行了全面检索,共纳入 25 项研究,涉及 1,650 名患者:结果:综述发现,在治疗各种肺部疾病,尤其是早期肺癌时,机器人 VATS 肺切除手术是传统开放手术的一种安全有效的替代方法。与传统开放式手术相比,该手术的住院时间更短、失血量更少、术后疼痛更轻:然而,机器人手术和开放手术的长期生存结果并无明显差异。该综述还强调了进一步研究的必要性,以确定在不同临床情况下机器人 VATS 肺切除手术的最佳使用方法,并确定该技术的收益是否大于成本。总之,该系统性综述表明,机器人 VATS 肺切除手术是一种安全有效的技术,可用于替代传统的开放手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery total pneumonectomy for lung cancer.

Introduction: This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy.

Aim: To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in treating various lung diseases.

Methods: A thorough search of electronic databases was conducted, and 25 studies encompassing 1,650 patients were included in the review.

Results: The review found that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the treatment of various lung diseases, particularly early-stage lung cancer. The surgery is associated with shorter hospitalizations, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain when compared to traditional open surgery.

Conclusions: However, long-term survival outcomes were not significantly different between robotic and open surgery. The review also highlights the need for further studies to determine the optimal use of robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery in different clinical scenarios and to determine whether the benefits of this technique outweigh the costs. Overall, this systematic review suggests that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective technique that can be used as an alternative to traditional open surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
期刊最新文献
Clinicodemographic profile and outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with sac: experience of a paediatric referral centre. Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study. Enhancing treatment approaches for postpneumonectomy empyema: exploring the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery. Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late. Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the Perfecta study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1