"斑马鱼为什么会溃疡":鱼类对压力的认知和社会调节。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Brain Behavior and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1159/000540113
Bianca Fusani, Rui F Oliveira
{"title":"\"斑马鱼为什么会溃疡\":鱼类对压力的认知和社会调节。","authors":"Bianca Fusani, Rui F Oliveira","doi":"10.1159/000540113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the bestseller book \"Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers\", Robert Sapolsky argues that animals do not suffer from stress-related diseases like humans because for them, stress is episodic, while humans in contrast suffer from chronic psychological stress. In particular, the idea that fish cannot experience psychological stress is still prevalent, partly due to the lack of a homologous brain area to the neocortex. However, emerging evidence suggests that teleosts can undergo psychological stress, defined as a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor, and in recent years, the underlying mechanisms started to be unveiled.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The occurrence of cognitive appraisal in the assessment of stressors has been demonstrated in fish, indicating that the subjective evaluation of stimulus valence and salience, rather than absolute intrinsic characteristics of the stimulus itself, play a key role in the activation of the stress response. Moreover, individual biases (i.e., cognitive bias) in the cognitive appraisal of stimuli have also been described in fish, with some individuals consistently evaluating ambiguous stimuli as positive (aka optimists) whereas other individuals (aka pessimists) appraise them as negative. As a result, optimists and pessimists show consistent differences in stress reactivity and susceptibility/resilience to disease. Finally, social context has also been shown to modulate the response to aversive stimuli with the behavior of conspecifics either buffering or enhancing the response (i.e., social buffering vs. social contagion).</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Cognitive appraisal of stressors occurs in fish, implying that the stress response is modulated by a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor. Moreover, interindividual consistent cognitive biases in the appraisal of stressors are also present in fish making some individuals more susceptible to stress-related diseases. Therefore, psychological stress has a health toll in fish, and psychologically stressed fish can potentially have ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":56328,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"248-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Why (Zebra)fish May Get Ulcers\\\": Cognitive and Social Modulation of Stress in Fish.\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Fusani, Rui F Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the bestseller book \\\"Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers\\\", Robert Sapolsky argues that animals do not suffer from stress-related diseases like humans because for them, stress is episodic, while humans in contrast suffer from chronic psychological stress. In particular, the idea that fish cannot experience psychological stress is still prevalent, partly due to the lack of a homologous brain area to the neocortex. However, emerging evidence suggests that teleosts can undergo psychological stress, defined as a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor, and in recent years, the underlying mechanisms started to be unveiled.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The occurrence of cognitive appraisal in the assessment of stressors has been demonstrated in fish, indicating that the subjective evaluation of stimulus valence and salience, rather than absolute intrinsic characteristics of the stimulus itself, play a key role in the activation of the stress response. Moreover, individual biases (i.e., cognitive bias) in the cognitive appraisal of stimuli have also been described in fish, with some individuals consistently evaluating ambiguous stimuli as positive (aka optimists) whereas other individuals (aka pessimists) appraise them as negative. As a result, optimists and pessimists show consistent differences in stress reactivity and susceptibility/resilience to disease. Finally, social context has also been shown to modulate the response to aversive stimuli with the behavior of conspecifics either buffering or enhancing the response (i.e., social buffering vs. social contagion).</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Cognitive appraisal of stressors occurs in fish, implying that the stress response is modulated by a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor. Moreover, interindividual consistent cognitive biases in the appraisal of stressors are also present in fish making some individuals more susceptible to stress-related diseases. Therefore, psychological stress has a health toll in fish, and psychologically stressed fish can potentially have ulcers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Behavior and Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"248-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Behavior and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍罗伯特-萨波斯基(Robert Sapolsky)在畅销书《斑马为什么不会得溃疡》[1]中认为,动物不会像人类一样患上与压力有关的疾病,因为对它们来说,压力是偶发的,而人类则遭受着慢性心理压力。特别是,认为鱼类不会经历心理压力的观点仍然很盛行,部分原因是鱼类缺乏与新皮质同源的脑区。然而,新出现的证据表明,远洋鱼类可以承受心理压力,这种压力被定义为对压力源的主观和知觉体验,近年来,其潜在机制开始被揭示出来。摘要:在鱼类中,对压力源的评估中出现了认知评价,这表明,对刺激物价值和显著性的主观评价,而不是刺激物本身的绝对内在特征,在激活压力反应中起着关键作用。此外,鱼类在对刺激物进行认知评价时也会出现个体偏差(即认知偏差),有些个体会始终将模棱两可的刺激物评价为积极的(又称乐观主义者),而另一些个体(又称悲观主义者)则将其评价为消极的。因此,乐观主义者和悲观主义者在压力反应和对疾病的易感性/复原力方面表现出一致的差异。最后,社会环境也被证明可以调节对厌恶刺激的反应,同类的行为可以缓冲或增强反应(即社会缓冲与社会传染):关键信息:鱼类会对应激源进行认知评估,这意味着应激反应会受到对应激源的主观和知觉体验的调节。此外,鱼类在评价压力源时也存在个体间一致的认知偏差,这使得某些个体更容易患上与压力有关的疾病。因此,心理压力会影响鱼类的健康,心理压力过大的鱼可能会患上溃疡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Why (Zebra)fish May Get Ulcers": Cognitive and Social Modulation of Stress in Fish.

Background: In the bestseller book "Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers", Robert Sapolsky argues that animals do not suffer from stress-related diseases like humans because for them, stress is episodic, while humans in contrast suffer from chronic psychological stress. In particular, the idea that fish cannot experience psychological stress is still prevalent, partly due to the lack of a homologous brain area to the neocortex. However, emerging evidence suggests that teleosts can undergo psychological stress, defined as a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor, and in recent years, the underlying mechanisms started to be unveiled.

Summary: The occurrence of cognitive appraisal in the assessment of stressors has been demonstrated in fish, indicating that the subjective evaluation of stimulus valence and salience, rather than absolute intrinsic characteristics of the stimulus itself, play a key role in the activation of the stress response. Moreover, individual biases (i.e., cognitive bias) in the cognitive appraisal of stimuli have also been described in fish, with some individuals consistently evaluating ambiguous stimuli as positive (aka optimists) whereas other individuals (aka pessimists) appraise them as negative. As a result, optimists and pessimists show consistent differences in stress reactivity and susceptibility/resilience to disease. Finally, social context has also been shown to modulate the response to aversive stimuli with the behavior of conspecifics either buffering or enhancing the response (i.e., social buffering vs. social contagion).

Key messages: Cognitive appraisal of stressors occurs in fish, implying that the stress response is modulated by a subjective and perceptual experience of the stressor. Moreover, interindividual consistent cognitive biases in the appraisal of stressors are also present in fish making some individuals more susceptible to stress-related diseases. Therefore, psychological stress has a health toll in fish, and psychologically stressed fish can potentially have ulcers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Behavior and Evolution
Brain Behavior and Evolution 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
23.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' is a journal with a loyal following, high standards, and a unique profile as the main outlet for the continuing scientific discourse on nervous system evolution. The journal publishes comparative neurobiological studies that focus on nervous system structure, function, or development in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Approaches range from the molecular over the anatomical and physiological to the behavioral. Despite this diversity, most papers published in ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' include an evolutionary angle, at least in the discussion, and focus on neural mechanisms or phenomena. Some purely behavioral research may be within the journal’s scope, but the suitability of such manuscripts will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The journal also publishes review articles that provide critical overviews of current topics in evolutionary neurobiology.
期刊最新文献
Evolution of plasticity in brain morphology. Population Density Drives Concerted Increase in Whole Brain Volume in a Wrasse Species Coris batuensis. Exploring the Expanded Role of Astrocytes in Primate Brain Evolution via Changes in Gene Expression. Brain activation patterns and dopaminergic neuron activity in response to conspecific advertisement calls in reproductive vs. non-reproductive male plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus). Organization of the Perioral Representation of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1