评估分娩期间受虐待和/或不尊重感的工具:验证研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104118
Antonio Hernández-Martínez , Julian Rodríguez-Almagro , Miriam Donate Manzanares , Inmaculada Ortiz Esquinas , Ana Rubio Alvárez , Ana Ballesta Castillejos , Nuria Infante Torres , Silvia García de Mateos , Victoriano Gónzalez Trujillo , Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano
{"title":"评估分娩期间受虐待和/或不尊重感的工具:验证研究。","authors":"Antonio Hernández-Martínez ,&nbsp;Julian Rodríguez-Almagro ,&nbsp;Miriam Donate Manzanares ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Ortiz Esquinas ,&nbsp;Ana Rubio Alvárez ,&nbsp;Ana Ballesta Castillejos ,&nbsp;Nuria Infante Torres ,&nbsp;Silvia García de Mateos ,&nbsp;Victoriano Gónzalez Trujillo ,&nbsp;Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To design and validate a tool to assess a woman's perception of whether she has experienced a situation of abuse or disrespect during childbirth attendance: “Childbirth Abuse and Respect Evaluation-Maternal Questionnaire” (CARE-MQ).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multidisciplinary panel of experts (gynecologists, midwives, mothers) participated in creating CARE-MQ. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 901 Spanish women who had given birth between 1 and 3 months before to determine psychometric characteristics. Finally, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a convergent validity study were carried out with the Quality Questionnaire from the Patient's Perspective-Intrapartum (QPP-I), and a reliability study using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and coefficient of intraclass correlation (CCI).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The KMO test gave a value of 0.935, and Bartlett's sphericity test was &lt;0.001. The EFA identified four components (“Emotional Abuse”, “Inadequate Professionalism”, “Physical Abuse” y “Lost contact”) that explained 55.16 % of variance. In the CFA, a good fit was observed for most of the evaluated indicators. CARE-MQ correlated negatively with QPP-I (Spearman's rho = −0.641, 95 % CI: −0.679, −0.600; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and was statistically associated with variables related to childbirth experience (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.005) such as the use of a birth plan, use of regional analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy, presence of severe tears, skin-to-skin contact, length of hospital stay and postpartum surgical intervention. Cronbach's α value was 0.903. The ICC of absolute agreement after administering the questionnaire one week after was 0.927 (95 % CI: 0.85–0.97).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CARE-MQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the perception of a woman regarding the situation of abuse and/or disrespect that she may have experienced during birth in a population of Spanish postpartum women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002018/pdfft?md5=956db7e9562cba3cadc7145746a87bad&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002018-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instrument to evaluate the perception of abuse and/or disrespectful treatment during childbirth: A validation study\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Hernández-Martínez ,&nbsp;Julian Rodríguez-Almagro ,&nbsp;Miriam Donate Manzanares ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Ortiz Esquinas ,&nbsp;Ana Rubio Alvárez ,&nbsp;Ana Ballesta Castillejos ,&nbsp;Nuria Infante Torres ,&nbsp;Silvia García de Mateos ,&nbsp;Victoriano Gónzalez Trujillo ,&nbsp;Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To design and validate a tool to assess a woman's perception of whether she has experienced a situation of abuse or disrespect during childbirth attendance: “Childbirth Abuse and Respect Evaluation-Maternal Questionnaire” (CARE-MQ).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multidisciplinary panel of experts (gynecologists, midwives, mothers) participated in creating CARE-MQ. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 901 Spanish women who had given birth between 1 and 3 months before to determine psychometric characteristics. Finally, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a convergent validity study were carried out with the Quality Questionnaire from the Patient's Perspective-Intrapartum (QPP-I), and a reliability study using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and coefficient of intraclass correlation (CCI).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The KMO test gave a value of 0.935, and Bartlett's sphericity test was &lt;0.001. The EFA identified four components (“Emotional Abuse”, “Inadequate Professionalism”, “Physical Abuse” y “Lost contact”) that explained 55.16 % of variance. In the CFA, a good fit was observed for most of the evaluated indicators. CARE-MQ correlated negatively with QPP-I (Spearman's rho = −0.641, 95 % CI: −0.679, −0.600; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and was statistically associated with variables related to childbirth experience (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.005) such as the use of a birth plan, use of regional analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy, presence of severe tears, skin-to-skin contact, length of hospital stay and postpartum surgical intervention. Cronbach's α value was 0.903. The ICC of absolute agreement after administering the questionnaire one week after was 0.927 (95 % CI: 0.85–0.97).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CARE-MQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the perception of a woman regarding the situation of abuse and/or disrespect that she may have experienced during birth in a population of Spanish postpartum women.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002018/pdfft?md5=956db7e9562cba3cadc7145746a87bad&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002018-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:设计并验证一种工具,用于评估产妇对其在分娩过程中是否遭受虐待或不尊重的感知:"方法:由多学科专家(妇科医生、助产士和产妇)组成的小组对产妇进行评估:多学科专家小组(妇科医生、助产士、母亲)参与了 CARE-MQ 的制作。对 901 名分娩前 1 至 3 个月的西班牙产妇进行了横断面研究,以确定心理测量特征。最后,还进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)、确证性因子分析(CFA)以及与产后病人视角质量问卷(QPP-I)的聚合效度研究,并使用内部一致性(Cronbach's α)和类内相关系数(CCI)进行了可靠性研究:结果:KMO 检验值为 0.935,巴特利特球形度检验为结论:在西班牙产后妇女群体中,CARE-MQ 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估妇女对其在分娩过程中可能遭受的虐待和/或不尊重情况的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Instrument to evaluate the perception of abuse and/or disrespectful treatment during childbirth: A validation study

Aim

To design and validate a tool to assess a woman's perception of whether she has experienced a situation of abuse or disrespect during childbirth attendance: “Childbirth Abuse and Respect Evaluation-Maternal Questionnaire” (CARE-MQ).

Methods

Multidisciplinary panel of experts (gynecologists, midwives, mothers) participated in creating CARE-MQ. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 901 Spanish women who had given birth between 1 and 3 months before to determine psychometric characteristics. Finally, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a convergent validity study were carried out with the Quality Questionnaire from the Patient's Perspective-Intrapartum (QPP-I), and a reliability study using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and coefficient of intraclass correlation (CCI).

Findings

The KMO test gave a value of 0.935, and Bartlett's sphericity test was <0.001. The EFA identified four components (“Emotional Abuse”, “Inadequate Professionalism”, “Physical Abuse” y “Lost contact”) that explained 55.16 % of variance. In the CFA, a good fit was observed for most of the evaluated indicators. CARE-MQ correlated negatively with QPP-I (Spearman's rho = −0.641, 95 % CI: −0.679, −0.600; p < 0.001) and was statistically associated with variables related to childbirth experience (p < 0.005) such as the use of a birth plan, use of regional analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy, presence of severe tears, skin-to-skin contact, length of hospital stay and postpartum surgical intervention. Cronbach's α value was 0.903. The ICC of absolute agreement after administering the questionnaire one week after was 0.927 (95 % CI: 0.85–0.97).

Conclusions

CARE-MQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the perception of a woman regarding the situation of abuse and/or disrespect that she may have experienced during birth in a population of Spanish postpartum women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1