量化心电图数字孪生模型的变异性

Elena Zappon, Matthias A. F. Gsell, Karli Gillette, Gernot Plank
{"title":"量化心电图数字孪生模型的变异性","authors":"Elena Zappon, Matthias A. F. Gsell, Karli Gillette, Gernot Plank","doi":"arxiv-2407.17146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CDT of human cardiac EP are digital replicas of patient hearts that match\nlike-for-like clinical observations. The ECG, as the most prevalent non-invasive observation of cardiac\nelectrophysiology, is considered an ideal target for CDT calibration. Recent\nadvanced CDT calibration methods have demonstrated their ability to minimize\ndiscrepancies between simulated and measured ECG signals, effectively\nreplicating all key morphological features relevant to diagnostics. However,\ndue to the inherent nature of clinical data acquisition and CDT model\ngeneration pipelines, discrepancies inevitably arise between the real physical\nelectrophysiology in a patient and the simulated virtual electrophysiology in a\nCDT. In this study, we aim to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the impact\nof these uncertainties on ECG morphology and diagnostic markers. We analyze\nresidual beat-to-beat variability in ECG recordings obtained from healthy\nsubjects and patients. Using a biophysically detailed and anatomically accurate\ncomputational model of whole-heart electrophysiology combined with a detailed\ntorso model calibrated to closely replicate measured ECG signals, we vary\nanatomical factors (heart location, orientation, size), heterogeneity in\nelectrical conductivities in the heart and torso, and electrode placements\nacross ECG leads to assess their qualitative impact on ECG morphology. Our study demonstrates that diagnostically relevant ECG features and overall\nmorphology appear relatively robust against the investigated uncertainties.\nThis resilience is consistent with the narrow distribution of ECG due to\nresidual beat-to-beat variability observed in both healthy subjects and\npatients.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying variabilities in cardiac digital twin models of the electrocardiogram\",\"authors\":\"Elena Zappon, Matthias A. F. Gsell, Karli Gillette, Gernot Plank\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.17146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CDT of human cardiac EP are digital replicas of patient hearts that match\\nlike-for-like clinical observations. The ECG, as the most prevalent non-invasive observation of cardiac\\nelectrophysiology, is considered an ideal target for CDT calibration. Recent\\nadvanced CDT calibration methods have demonstrated their ability to minimize\\ndiscrepancies between simulated and measured ECG signals, effectively\\nreplicating all key morphological features relevant to diagnostics. However,\\ndue to the inherent nature of clinical data acquisition and CDT model\\ngeneration pipelines, discrepancies inevitably arise between the real physical\\nelectrophysiology in a patient and the simulated virtual electrophysiology in a\\nCDT. In this study, we aim to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the impact\\nof these uncertainties on ECG morphology and diagnostic markers. We analyze\\nresidual beat-to-beat variability in ECG recordings obtained from healthy\\nsubjects and patients. Using a biophysically detailed and anatomically accurate\\ncomputational model of whole-heart electrophysiology combined with a detailed\\ntorso model calibrated to closely replicate measured ECG signals, we vary\\nanatomical factors (heart location, orientation, size), heterogeneity in\\nelectrical conductivities in the heart and torso, and electrode placements\\nacross ECG leads to assess their qualitative impact on ECG morphology. Our study demonstrates that diagnostically relevant ECG features and overall\\nmorphology appear relatively robust against the investigated uncertainties.\\nThis resilience is consistent with the narrow distribution of ECG due to\\nresidual beat-to-beat variability observed in both healthy subjects and\\npatients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体心脏电生理 CDT 是病人心脏的数字复制品,与临床观察结果相似。心电图作为心电生理学最普遍的非侵入性观察指标,被认为是 CDT 校准的理想目标。最新的先进 CDT 校准方法已证明其有能力最大限度地减少模拟和测量心电信号之间的差异,有效地复制与诊断相关的所有关键形态特征。然而,由于临床数据采集和 CDT 模型生成管道的固有性质,患者的真实物理电生理学与 CDT 中模拟的虚拟电生理学之间不可避免地会出现差异。本研究旨在定性和定量分析这些不确定性对心电图形态和诊断指标的影响。我们分析了健康受试者和患者心电图记录中每一拍之间的残余变异性。我们使用生物物理上详细、解剖学上精确的全心电生理学计算模型,并结合详细的躯干模型进行校准,以密切复制测量的心电信号,我们改变了解剖学因素(心脏位置、方向、大小)、心脏和躯干电导率的异质性以及心电图导联的电极位置,以评估它们对心电图形态的定性影响。我们的研究表明,与诊断相关的心电图特征和整体形态在所调查的不确定性面前显得相对稳健。这种稳健性与在健康受试者和患者身上观察到的心电图因残留的节拍间变异性而造成的狭窄分布是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying variabilities in cardiac digital twin models of the electrocardiogram
CDT of human cardiac EP are digital replicas of patient hearts that match like-for-like clinical observations. The ECG, as the most prevalent non-invasive observation of cardiac electrophysiology, is considered an ideal target for CDT calibration. Recent advanced CDT calibration methods have demonstrated their ability to minimize discrepancies between simulated and measured ECG signals, effectively replicating all key morphological features relevant to diagnostics. However, due to the inherent nature of clinical data acquisition and CDT model generation pipelines, discrepancies inevitably arise between the real physical electrophysiology in a patient and the simulated virtual electrophysiology in a CDT. In this study, we aim to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the impact of these uncertainties on ECG morphology and diagnostic markers. We analyze residual beat-to-beat variability in ECG recordings obtained from healthy subjects and patients. Using a biophysically detailed and anatomically accurate computational model of whole-heart electrophysiology combined with a detailed torso model calibrated to closely replicate measured ECG signals, we vary anatomical factors (heart location, orientation, size), heterogeneity in electrical conductivities in the heart and torso, and electrode placements across ECG leads to assess their qualitative impact on ECG morphology. Our study demonstrates that diagnostically relevant ECG features and overall morphology appear relatively robust against the investigated uncertainties. This resilience is consistent with the narrow distribution of ECG due to residual beat-to-beat variability observed in both healthy subjects and patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Validation of a Real-Time Machine Learning-based System for the Detection of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Flow Cytometry Dynamic landscapes and statistical limits on growth during cell fate specification (Un)buckling mechanics of epithelial monolayers under compression On the design and stability of cancer adaptive therapy cycles: deterministic and stochastic models Celcomen: spatial causal disentanglement for single-cell and tissue perturbation modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1