基于内容的图像检索帮助放射科医生诊断核磁共振成像中的眼部和眼眶肿块病变

Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Winna Lim, Benjamin Wildfeuer, Elisa Birgit Sodemann, Augustin Lecler, Simon Stemplinger, Ahi-Sema Issever, Ali Sepahdari, Soenke Langner, Dagmar Kainmueller, Bernd Hamm, Katharina Erg-Eigner
{"title":"基于内容的图像检索帮助放射科医生诊断核磁共振成像中的眼部和眼眶肿块病变","authors":"Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Winna Lim, Benjamin Wildfeuer, Elisa Birgit Sodemann, Augustin Lecler, Simon Stemplinger, Ahi-Sema Issever, Ali Sepahdari, Soenke Langner, Dagmar Kainmueller, Bernd Hamm, Katharina Erg-Eigner","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.24.24310920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nDiagnoses of eye and orbit pathologies by radiological imaging is challenging due to their low prevalence and the relative high number of possible pathologies and variability in presentation, thus requiring substantial domain-specific experience.\nPurpose:\nThis study investigates whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool paired with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists across different experience levels.\nMaterial and Methods:\nWe tested these two hypotheses in a multi-reader, multi-case study, with 36 readers and 48 retrospective eye and orbit MRI cases. We asked each reader to diagnose eight orbital MRI cases, four while having only status quo reference tools available (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx, etc.), and four while having a CBIR reference tool additionally available. Then, we analyzed and compared the results with linear mixed effects models, controlling for the cases and participants.\nResults:\nOverall, we found a strong positive effect on diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool only as compared to using status quo tools only (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR only 70.59%, 26.32% relative improvement, p=.03, odds ratio=2.07), and an even stronger effect when using the CBIR tool in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR + status quo 83.33%, 49% relative improvement, p=.02, odds ratio=3.65). Reading time in seconds (s) decreased when using only the CBIR tool (status quo only 334s, CBIR only 236s, 29% decrease, p<.001), but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 334s, CBIR + status quo 396s, 19% increase, p<.001). Conclusion:\nWe found significant positive effects on diagnostic accuracy and mixed effects on reading times when using the CBIR reference tool, indicating the potential benefits when using CBIR reference tools in diagnosing eye and orbit mass lesions by radiological imaging.","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI\",\"authors\":\"Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Winna Lim, Benjamin Wildfeuer, Elisa Birgit Sodemann, Augustin Lecler, Simon Stemplinger, Ahi-Sema Issever, Ali Sepahdari, Soenke Langner, Dagmar Kainmueller, Bernd Hamm, Katharina Erg-Eigner\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.24.24310920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:\\nDiagnoses of eye and orbit pathologies by radiological imaging is challenging due to their low prevalence and the relative high number of possible pathologies and variability in presentation, thus requiring substantial domain-specific experience.\\nPurpose:\\nThis study investigates whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool paired with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists across different experience levels.\\nMaterial and Methods:\\nWe tested these two hypotheses in a multi-reader, multi-case study, with 36 readers and 48 retrospective eye and orbit MRI cases. We asked each reader to diagnose eight orbital MRI cases, four while having only status quo reference tools available (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx, etc.), and four while having a CBIR reference tool additionally available. Then, we analyzed and compared the results with linear mixed effects models, controlling for the cases and participants.\\nResults:\\nOverall, we found a strong positive effect on diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool only as compared to using status quo tools only (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR only 70.59%, 26.32% relative improvement, p=.03, odds ratio=2.07), and an even stronger effect when using the CBIR tool in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR + status quo 83.33%, 49% relative improvement, p=.02, odds ratio=3.65). Reading time in seconds (s) decreased when using only the CBIR tool (status quo only 334s, CBIR only 236s, 29% decrease, p<.001), but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 334s, CBIR + status quo 396s, 19% increase, p<.001). Conclusion:\\nWe found significant positive effects on diagnostic accuracy and mixed effects on reading times when using the CBIR reference tool, indicating the potential benefits when using CBIR reference tools in diagnosing eye and orbit mass lesions by radiological imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射成像诊断眼部和眼眶病变具有挑战性,因为它们的发病率低,可能的病变相对较多,而且表现形式多变,因此需要大量特定领域的经验。材料与方法:我们在一项多读者、多病例研究中测试了这两项假设,共有 36 名读者和 48 个回顾性眼部和眼眶 MRI 病例。我们要求每位读者诊断 8 个眼眶 MRI 病例,其中 4 个病例只能使用现状参考工具(如 Radiopaedia.org、StatDx 等),另外 4 个病例可以使用 CBIR 参考工具。然后,我们利用线性混合效应模型对结果进行了分析和比较,并对病例和参与者进行了控制。结果:总体而言,与仅使用现状工具相比,我们发现仅使用 CBIR 工具对诊断准确率有很大的积极影响(仅使用现状工具为 55.88%, CBIR only 70.59%, 26.32% relative improvement, p=.03, odds ratio=2.07),而在同时使用 CBIR 工具和现状工具时,效果更强(现状工具仅为 55.88%, CBIR +现状工具为 83.33%, 49% relative improvement, p=.02, odds ratio=3.65)。仅使用 CBIR 工具时,以秒(s)为单位的阅读时间减少了(现状仅 334 秒,CBIR 仅 236 秒,减少 29%,p<.001),但与现状工具结合使用时,阅读时间增加了(现状仅 334 秒,CBIR + 现状 396 秒,增加 19%,p<.001)。结论:我们发现使用 CBIR 参考工具对诊断准确性有明显的积极影响,而对阅读时间则有不同的影响,这表明使用 CBIR 参考工具对放射成像诊断眼部和眼眶肿块病变有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI
Background: Diagnoses of eye and orbit pathologies by radiological imaging is challenging due to their low prevalence and the relative high number of possible pathologies and variability in presentation, thus requiring substantial domain-specific experience. Purpose: This study investigates whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool paired with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists across different experience levels. Material and Methods: We tested these two hypotheses in a multi-reader, multi-case study, with 36 readers and 48 retrospective eye and orbit MRI cases. We asked each reader to diagnose eight orbital MRI cases, four while having only status quo reference tools available (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx, etc.), and four while having a CBIR reference tool additionally available. Then, we analyzed and compared the results with linear mixed effects models, controlling for the cases and participants. Results: Overall, we found a strong positive effect on diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool only as compared to using status quo tools only (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR only 70.59%, 26.32% relative improvement, p=.03, odds ratio=2.07), and an even stronger effect when using the CBIR tool in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR + status quo 83.33%, 49% relative improvement, p=.02, odds ratio=3.65). Reading time in seconds (s) decreased when using only the CBIR tool (status quo only 334s, CBIR only 236s, 29% decrease, p<.001), but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 334s, CBIR + status quo 396s, 19% increase, p<.001). Conclusion: We found significant positive effects on diagnostic accuracy and mixed effects on reading times when using the CBIR reference tool, indicating the potential benefits when using CBIR reference tools in diagnosing eye and orbit mass lesions by radiological imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1