导言:维多利亚诗歌的地位

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 POETRY VICTORIAN POETRY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1353/vp.2024.a933695
John B. Lamb
{"title":"导言:维多利亚诗歌的地位","authors":"John B. Lamb","doi":"10.1353/vp.2024.a933695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Introduction: <span>The Place of Victorian Poetry</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> John B. Lamb </li> </ul> <p>“The future of poetry is immense.” So claimed Matthew Arnold in “The Study of Poetry” originally published in 1880 as the general introduction to <em>The English Poets</em>, edited by T. H. Ward. Arnold went on to encourage his readers to “conceive of [poetry] as capable of higher uses, and called to higher destinies, than those which in general men have assigned to it hitherto. More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete.”<sup>1</sup></p> <p>“The Study of Poetry” is perhaps most notable not for those English poets Arnold excludes from the narrow confines of the “classic”—Chaucer, Pope, Burns, and all the Romantics save Wordsworth—but for those he fails to mention at all, those contemporary Victorian poets whose major work was published by 1880. However, the study of the Victorian poets Arnold consigns to the hinterlands of literary history, as well as their fin-de-siècle compatriots, has since 1963 found its place in <em>Victorian Poetry</em>.</p> <p>Today, Arnold’s proscriptions may seem to us, as they did to some of his contemporaries, more like an act of border control designed “not just to distinguish but to <em>keep apart</em>.” As the philosopher Edward Casey suggests, “Every border is constructed such that it is closed or subject to closure.” But a boundary, Casey maintains, is “intrinsically permeable; it is porous by its very nature.”<sup>2</sup> Boundaries have an “inherent openness and vagueness of spatial extent”;<sup>3</sup> and the ever-expanding boundaries of nineteenth-century poetry and its study are once again charted in this issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry Redux.”</p> <p>Certain forms of critical practice, not only during the nineteenth century but also in our own era of book banning and the unrelenting assault on the humanities, appear committed to shoring up the allegedly porous borders of literary and cultural history--some may cross but others may not. But for the past six decades <em>Victorian Poetry</em>, led by a committed and always insightful band of scholars, has been mining the rich repositories of nineteenth-century <strong>[End Page 433]</strong> poetry while at the same time undermining the borders—those cultural and institutional walls still prevalent today—that would consign poetry and its study to permanent exile.</p> <p>In a discussion of the work of the writer and naturalist Richard Mabey, the geographer Hayden Lorimer notes, “What Mabey’s work seems to exemplify is a certain way of carrying yourself into the craft of study: where the shape of a topic cannot be said to exist, but rather to occur in the act.”<sup>4</sup> But all too often, particularly in the age of STEM, academic inquiry and the pedagogy it underwrites is driven by the logic of transport; it is, in the words of the anthropologist Tim Ingold, “destination oriented,” concerned more with the terminus than the journey.<sup>5</sup> But if we apply Ingold’s concept of wayfaring to the craft of literary study, to the study of poetry, we might see that study as part of a “continual engagement with the field of practice”—here, for our purposes, literary and cultural inquiry.<sup>6</sup> Pushing the metaphor further, we might say that the scholar as wayfarer comes to know what they do by moving around freely (sometimes even wandering) in a certain intellectual and aesthetic environment, and the “map” of that journey is a meshwork of the paths of inquiry they and others have followed. For Ingold, wayfaring is a way of thinking and knowing or “<em>thinking in movement</em>,”<sup>7</sup> and such movement, as the essays gathered in this issue attest, alternates between recollection and anticipation. As Ingold says, “we know <em>as</em> we go, not <em>before</em> we go.”<sup>8</sup> It is in such wayfaring, Rebecca Solnit reminds us, that we can encounter the “unpredictable and incalculable.” New places, be they geographical, aesthetic, or intellectual, “offer up new thoughts, new possibilities.”<sup>9</sup></p> <p>Wishing to contemplate a landscape of new possibilities at the close of 2003, <em>Victorian Poetry</em> published a special issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry?” guest edited by Linda K. Hughes. That issue brought together...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry\",\"authors\":\"John B. Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vp.2024.a933695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Introduction: <span>The Place of Victorian Poetry</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> John B. Lamb </li> </ul> <p>“The future of poetry is immense.” So claimed Matthew Arnold in “The Study of Poetry” originally published in 1880 as the general introduction to <em>The English Poets</em>, edited by T. H. Ward. Arnold went on to encourage his readers to “conceive of [poetry] as capable of higher uses, and called to higher destinies, than those which in general men have assigned to it hitherto. More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete.”<sup>1</sup></p> <p>“The Study of Poetry” is perhaps most notable not for those English poets Arnold excludes from the narrow confines of the “classic”—Chaucer, Pope, Burns, and all the Romantics save Wordsworth—but for those he fails to mention at all, those contemporary Victorian poets whose major work was published by 1880. However, the study of the Victorian poets Arnold consigns to the hinterlands of literary history, as well as their fin-de-siècle compatriots, has since 1963 found its place in <em>Victorian Poetry</em>.</p> <p>Today, Arnold’s proscriptions may seem to us, as they did to some of his contemporaries, more like an act of border control designed “not just to distinguish but to <em>keep apart</em>.” As the philosopher Edward Casey suggests, “Every border is constructed such that it is closed or subject to closure.” But a boundary, Casey maintains, is “intrinsically permeable; it is porous by its very nature.”<sup>2</sup> Boundaries have an “inherent openness and vagueness of spatial extent”;<sup>3</sup> and the ever-expanding boundaries of nineteenth-century poetry and its study are once again charted in this issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry Redux.”</p> <p>Certain forms of critical practice, not only during the nineteenth century but also in our own era of book banning and the unrelenting assault on the humanities, appear committed to shoring up the allegedly porous borders of literary and cultural history--some may cross but others may not. But for the past six decades <em>Victorian Poetry</em>, led by a committed and always insightful band of scholars, has been mining the rich repositories of nineteenth-century <strong>[End Page 433]</strong> poetry while at the same time undermining the borders—those cultural and institutional walls still prevalent today—that would consign poetry and its study to permanent exile.</p> <p>In a discussion of the work of the writer and naturalist Richard Mabey, the geographer Hayden Lorimer notes, “What Mabey’s work seems to exemplify is a certain way of carrying yourself into the craft of study: where the shape of a topic cannot be said to exist, but rather to occur in the act.”<sup>4</sup> But all too often, particularly in the age of STEM, academic inquiry and the pedagogy it underwrites is driven by the logic of transport; it is, in the words of the anthropologist Tim Ingold, “destination oriented,” concerned more with the terminus than the journey.<sup>5</sup> But if we apply Ingold’s concept of wayfaring to the craft of literary study, to the study of poetry, we might see that study as part of a “continual engagement with the field of practice”—here, for our purposes, literary and cultural inquiry.<sup>6</sup> Pushing the metaphor further, we might say that the scholar as wayfarer comes to know what they do by moving around freely (sometimes even wandering) in a certain intellectual and aesthetic environment, and the “map” of that journey is a meshwork of the paths of inquiry they and others have followed. For Ingold, wayfaring is a way of thinking and knowing or “<em>thinking in movement</em>,”<sup>7</sup> and such movement, as the essays gathered in this issue attest, alternates between recollection and anticipation. As Ingold says, “we know <em>as</em> we go, not <em>before</em> we go.”<sup>8</sup> It is in such wayfaring, Rebecca Solnit reminds us, that we can encounter the “unpredictable and incalculable.” New places, be they geographical, aesthetic, or intellectual, “offer up new thoughts, new possibilities.”<sup>9</sup></p> <p>Wishing to contemplate a landscape of new possibilities at the close of 2003, <em>Victorian Poetry</em> published a special issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry?” guest edited by Linda K. Hughes. That issue brought together...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2024.a933695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2024.a933695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 导言:维多利亚诗歌的地位 约翰-B-兰姆 "诗歌的未来是无限的"。马修-阿诺德(Matthew Arnold)在 "诗歌研究 "一文中如是说,该文最初于 1880 年作为 T. H. Ward 编辑的《英国诗人》的总序出版。阿诺德继续鼓励他的读者 "设想[诗歌]具有比一般人迄今赋予它的更高的用途和更高的命运。越来越多的人类将发现,我们必须求助于诗歌来为我们诠释生活,安慰我们,支撑我们。没有诗歌,我们的科学将显得不完整。"1 "诗歌研究 "最引人注目的也许不是那些被阿诺德排除在狭隘的 "经典 "范围之外的英国诗人--乔叟、波普、伯恩斯以及除华兹华斯之外的所有浪漫派诗人,而是他根本没有提及的那些当代维多利亚诗人,他们的主要作品都是在 1880 年之前发表的。然而,自 1963 年以来,阿诺德将维多利亚时期的诗人以及他们的末世同胞置于文学史腹地的研究已在《维多利亚诗歌》中找到了自己的位置。今天,在我们看来,阿诺德的禁令就像他同时代的一些人一样,更像是一种边境管制行为,旨在 "不仅区分,而且隔离"。正如哲学家爱德华-凯西(Edward Casey)所言,"每一条边界都是封闭的或可能封闭的"。2 边界具有 "固有的开放性和空间范围的模糊性";3 本期 "维多利亚诗歌再论 "再次描绘了 19 世纪诗歌及其研究不断扩展的边界。某些形式的批评实践,不仅在十九世纪,而且在我们这个禁书和对人文学科无情打击的时代,似乎都致力于巩固文学史和文化史的所谓漏洞百出的边界--有些可能跨越,有些可能不跨越。但在过去的六十年里,《维多利亚诗歌》在一群坚定且始终富有洞察力的学者的领导下,一直在挖掘十九世纪诗歌的丰富宝库,同时也在破坏那些会将诗歌及其研究永久放逐的边界--那些至今仍普遍存在的文化和制度之墙。地理学家海登-洛里默(Hayden Lorimer)在讨论作家兼博物学家理查德-马贝(Richard Mabey)的作品时指出:"马贝的作品似乎体现了某种将自己带入研究技艺的方式:在这里,一个主题的形态不能说是存在的,而是在行为中发生的。"4 但很多时候,尤其是在 STEM 时代,学术探究及其所依托的教学法是由运输逻辑所驱动的;用人类学家蒂姆-英戈尔德(Tim Ingold)的话说,它是 "以目的地为导向的",更多关注的是终点而不是旅程5。但是,如果我们将英戈尔德的 "旅行 "概念应用于文学研究,应用于诗歌研究,我们就可以将这种研究视为 "与实践领域的持续接触 "的一部分--在这里,就我们的目的而言,是文学和文化探究。6 如果将这一比喻进一步推而广之,我们可以说,作为旅行者的学者是通过在特定的知识和审美环境中自由移动(有时甚至是游荡)来了解他们所做的事情的,而这一旅程的 "地图 "则是他们和其他人所走过的探究之路的网状结构。在英格尔德看来,"旅行 "是一种思考和认识的方式,或者说是 "在运动中思考 "7 ,而这种运动,正如本期所收集的文章所证明的那样,是在回忆与期待之间交替进行的。8 丽贝卡-索尔尼特提醒我们,正是在这样的旅行中,我们才能遇到 "不可预知和不可估量的 "事物。新的地方,无论是地理的、审美的还是思想的,都 "提供了新的思想、新的可能性 "9。2003 年年末,《维多利亚诗歌》出版了一期特刊《维多利亚诗歌何去何从?该特刊汇集了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry
  • John B. Lamb

“The future of poetry is immense.” So claimed Matthew Arnold in “The Study of Poetry” originally published in 1880 as the general introduction to The English Poets, edited by T. H. Ward. Arnold went on to encourage his readers to “conceive of [poetry] as capable of higher uses, and called to higher destinies, than those which in general men have assigned to it hitherto. More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete.”1

“The Study of Poetry” is perhaps most notable not for those English poets Arnold excludes from the narrow confines of the “classic”—Chaucer, Pope, Burns, and all the Romantics save Wordsworth—but for those he fails to mention at all, those contemporary Victorian poets whose major work was published by 1880. However, the study of the Victorian poets Arnold consigns to the hinterlands of literary history, as well as their fin-de-siècle compatriots, has since 1963 found its place in Victorian Poetry.

Today, Arnold’s proscriptions may seem to us, as they did to some of his contemporaries, more like an act of border control designed “not just to distinguish but to keep apart.” As the philosopher Edward Casey suggests, “Every border is constructed such that it is closed or subject to closure.” But a boundary, Casey maintains, is “intrinsically permeable; it is porous by its very nature.”2 Boundaries have an “inherent openness and vagueness of spatial extent”;3 and the ever-expanding boundaries of nineteenth-century poetry and its study are once again charted in this issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry Redux.”

Certain forms of critical practice, not only during the nineteenth century but also in our own era of book banning and the unrelenting assault on the humanities, appear committed to shoring up the allegedly porous borders of literary and cultural history--some may cross but others may not. But for the past six decades Victorian Poetry, led by a committed and always insightful band of scholars, has been mining the rich repositories of nineteenth-century [End Page 433] poetry while at the same time undermining the borders—those cultural and institutional walls still prevalent today—that would consign poetry and its study to permanent exile.

In a discussion of the work of the writer and naturalist Richard Mabey, the geographer Hayden Lorimer notes, “What Mabey’s work seems to exemplify is a certain way of carrying yourself into the craft of study: where the shape of a topic cannot be said to exist, but rather to occur in the act.”4 But all too often, particularly in the age of STEM, academic inquiry and the pedagogy it underwrites is driven by the logic of transport; it is, in the words of the anthropologist Tim Ingold, “destination oriented,” concerned more with the terminus than the journey.5 But if we apply Ingold’s concept of wayfaring to the craft of literary study, to the study of poetry, we might see that study as part of a “continual engagement with the field of practice”—here, for our purposes, literary and cultural inquiry.6 Pushing the metaphor further, we might say that the scholar as wayfarer comes to know what they do by moving around freely (sometimes even wandering) in a certain intellectual and aesthetic environment, and the “map” of that journey is a meshwork of the paths of inquiry they and others have followed. For Ingold, wayfaring is a way of thinking and knowing or “thinking in movement,”7 and such movement, as the essays gathered in this issue attest, alternates between recollection and anticipation. As Ingold says, “we know as we go, not before we go.”8 It is in such wayfaring, Rebecca Solnit reminds us, that we can encounter the “unpredictable and incalculable.” New places, be they geographical, aesthetic, or intellectual, “offer up new thoughts, new possibilities.”9

Wishing to contemplate a landscape of new possibilities at the close of 2003, Victorian Poetry published a special issue, “Whither Victorian Poetry?” guest edited by Linda K. Hughes. That issue brought together...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry Keeping Faith in Victorian Poetry Reflections on Twenty Years in Victorian Poetry Victorian Women's Poetry and the Near-Death Experience of a Category Undisciplining Art Sisterhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1