妇女与光明诗篇五月的肯德尔

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 POETRY VICTORIAN POETRY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1353/vp.2024.a933703
Lee Behlman
{"title":"妇女与光明诗篇五月的肯德尔","authors":"Lee Behlman","doi":"10.1353/vp.2024.a933703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Women and Light Verse: <span>On May Kendall</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lee Behlman (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>S</strong>everal years ago, I wrote in <em>Victorian Poetry</em> about the long history and shifting critical conceptions of light verse, or what for much of the nineteenth century was called <em>vers de société</em>.<sup>1</sup> This was verse typically set in a refined social milieu, with a male speaker, and having the qualities of what one nineteenth-century critic, Frederic Locker-Lampson, called “brevity and buoyancy.”<sup>2</sup> Exploring the work of practitioners and critics of the form, I noted that a specifically comic register, while never excluded, was not viewed as its essential characteristic until the early twentieth century. Before then, <em>vers de société</em> “dwelled in a conceptual middle ground defined by balance and detachment—emotional, formal, even philosophical,” including “an Enlightenment-era aesthetic of poised, ‘polished’ form; an emotional tenor set between raucous humor and tragedy; and a philosophic position of detachment from and acceptance of life’s suffering.”<sup>3</sup> That essay became a point of departure for a broader exploration of the critical potential for the study of verse as an alternative to its ostensibly more elevated counterpart, poetry, that I undertook with Olivia Loksing Moy. In the introduction to our edited collection, <em>Victorian Verse: The Poetics of Everyday Life</em> (2023), we offer what we term “verse studies” as a framework for engaging with the vast poetic output of the nineteenth century, in order “to counter critical tendencies that have long narrowed our curricula and our scholarly practices.”<sup>4</sup> Our contributors explore such subjects as the crucial periodical contexts for most Victorian verse production as well as verse forms such as ballades and rondels, hymns, children’s poetry, comic verse published in <em>Punch</em> and <em>Fun</em>, working-class and colonial ballads, and sonnets written for parlor games.</p> <p>A pathway that I’d like to offer here for verse studies is to return to the subject of specifically <em>light</em> verse—a vast corpus that, with the notable exception of recent work on nonsense verse, remains underexplored<sup>5</sup>—in a different context: How did women poets, who increasingly adopted new <strong>[End Page 531]</strong> authorial personas as the influence of the poetess tradition began to wane in the later nineteenth century, take up the mantle of lightness? I’ve selected a signal example to explore, the poet May Kendall (1861–1943), a figure invoked by Marion Thain in a notable essay from the first <em>Whither Victorian Poetry?</em> special issue. In 2003, after a recent wave of scholarship recovering the work of non-canonical Victorian women poets, Thain used May Kendall to frame the question “What Kind of a Critical Category Is ‘Women’s Poetry?’”<sup>6</sup> Thain’s answer was pragmatic. In short, it should be maximally expansive, to cover the full range of topics addressed, personas adopted, and formal modes applied and innovated in the nineteenth century. As she noted then, the crucial period of expansion was the 1880s and 1890s, when women poets increasingly operated outside of the constraints of common poetess <em>topoi</em> such as domesticity, Christian consolation, and wrecked romance. She suggested that whenever we hear it, we translate the term “women’s poetry” into “women’s poetries,” explicitly acknowledging the multiple gendered positions that these figures assumed, especially in the last two decades of the century (p. 582). I’m seeking here to take up Thain’s invitation by exploring an aspect of Kendall’s verse not addressed in Thain’s essay: Kendall’s variant adaptations of modes of “lightness” in her early poetry, including the volumes <em>Dreams to Sell</em> (1887) and <em>Songs from Dreamland</em> (1894).<sup>7</sup> In both of these collections, Kendall adapts and reworks the typically masculine territory of light verse for her own ends, treating the latest scientific subjects.</p> <p>Kendall’s proficiency as a comic poet was recognized in her own time: as Thain notes in Alfred Henry Miles’s <em>The Poets and Poetry of the Century</em> (his 10-volume anthology series published in the 1890s), Kendall was the only female poet included in the volume devoted to “Humour, Society, Parody and Occasional Verse”; all other women poets were confined to the volumes dedicated to poetry by women or on religious verse. When we compare...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women and Light Verse: On May Kendall\",\"authors\":\"Lee Behlman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vp.2024.a933703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Women and Light Verse: <span>On May Kendall</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lee Behlman (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>S</strong>everal years ago, I wrote in <em>Victorian Poetry</em> about the long history and shifting critical conceptions of light verse, or what for much of the nineteenth century was called <em>vers de société</em>.<sup>1</sup> This was verse typically set in a refined social milieu, with a male speaker, and having the qualities of what one nineteenth-century critic, Frederic Locker-Lampson, called “brevity and buoyancy.”<sup>2</sup> Exploring the work of practitioners and critics of the form, I noted that a specifically comic register, while never excluded, was not viewed as its essential characteristic until the early twentieth century. Before then, <em>vers de société</em> “dwelled in a conceptual middle ground defined by balance and detachment—emotional, formal, even philosophical,” including “an Enlightenment-era aesthetic of poised, ‘polished’ form; an emotional tenor set between raucous humor and tragedy; and a philosophic position of detachment from and acceptance of life’s suffering.”<sup>3</sup> That essay became a point of departure for a broader exploration of the critical potential for the study of verse as an alternative to its ostensibly more elevated counterpart, poetry, that I undertook with Olivia Loksing Moy. In the introduction to our edited collection, <em>Victorian Verse: The Poetics of Everyday Life</em> (2023), we offer what we term “verse studies” as a framework for engaging with the vast poetic output of the nineteenth century, in order “to counter critical tendencies that have long narrowed our curricula and our scholarly practices.”<sup>4</sup> Our contributors explore such subjects as the crucial periodical contexts for most Victorian verse production as well as verse forms such as ballades and rondels, hymns, children’s poetry, comic verse published in <em>Punch</em> and <em>Fun</em>, working-class and colonial ballads, and sonnets written for parlor games.</p> <p>A pathway that I’d like to offer here for verse studies is to return to the subject of specifically <em>light</em> verse—a vast corpus that, with the notable exception of recent work on nonsense verse, remains underexplored<sup>5</sup>—in a different context: How did women poets, who increasingly adopted new <strong>[End Page 531]</strong> authorial personas as the influence of the poetess tradition began to wane in the later nineteenth century, take up the mantle of lightness? I’ve selected a signal example to explore, the poet May Kendall (1861–1943), a figure invoked by Marion Thain in a notable essay from the first <em>Whither Victorian Poetry?</em> special issue. In 2003, after a recent wave of scholarship recovering the work of non-canonical Victorian women poets, Thain used May Kendall to frame the question “What Kind of a Critical Category Is ‘Women’s Poetry?’”<sup>6</sup> Thain’s answer was pragmatic. In short, it should be maximally expansive, to cover the full range of topics addressed, personas adopted, and formal modes applied and innovated in the nineteenth century. As she noted then, the crucial period of expansion was the 1880s and 1890s, when women poets increasingly operated outside of the constraints of common poetess <em>topoi</em> such as domesticity, Christian consolation, and wrecked romance. She suggested that whenever we hear it, we translate the term “women’s poetry” into “women’s poetries,” explicitly acknowledging the multiple gendered positions that these figures assumed, especially in the last two decades of the century (p. 582). I’m seeking here to take up Thain’s invitation by exploring an aspect of Kendall’s verse not addressed in Thain’s essay: Kendall’s variant adaptations of modes of “lightness” in her early poetry, including the volumes <em>Dreams to Sell</em> (1887) and <em>Songs from Dreamland</em> (1894).<sup>7</sup> In both of these collections, Kendall adapts and reworks the typically masculine territory of light verse for her own ends, treating the latest scientific subjects.</p> <p>Kendall’s proficiency as a comic poet was recognized in her own time: as Thain notes in Alfred Henry Miles’s <em>The Poets and Poetry of the Century</em> (his 10-volume anthology series published in the 1890s), Kendall was the only female poet included in the volume devoted to “Humour, Society, Parody and Occasional Verse”; all other women poets were confined to the volumes dedicated to poetry by women or on religious verse. When we compare...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2024.a933703\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2024.a933703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 女性与轻诗歌:几年前,我曾在《维多利亚诗歌》一书中写道,关于轻诗歌(或在十九世纪的大部分时间里被称为社会诗歌1)的悠久历史和不断变化的批评概念。1 这种诗歌通常以高雅的社会环境为背景,以男性为演讲者,具有十九世纪评论家弗雷德里克-洛克-兰普森(Frederic Locker-Lampson)所说的 "简洁、明快 "的特质。在此之前,"社会诗篇""停留在一个概念上的中间地带,其定义是平衡和疏离--情感上的、形式上的,甚至是哲学上的",包括 "一种启蒙时代的美学,即蓄势待发、'精雕细琢'的形式;一种介于喧闹幽默和悲剧之间的情感基调;以及一种对人生苦难的疏离和接受的哲学立场 "3。"3这篇文章成为我与奥利维亚-洛克辛-莫伊(Olivia Loksing Moy)对诗歌研究的批评潜力进行更广泛探索的出发点。在我们编辑的诗集《维多利亚时代的诗歌》(Victorian Verse:在我们编辑的文集《维多利亚诗歌:日常生活诗学》(2023 年)的序言中,我们提出了所谓的 "诗歌研究",以此作为与 19 世纪大量诗歌作品打交道的框架,以 "对抗长期以来使我们的课程和学术实践变得狭窄的批评倾向"。"4我们的撰稿人探讨的主题包括:维多利亚时期大多数诗歌创作的重要期刊背景以及诗歌形式,如圆舞曲和回旋曲、赞美诗、儿童诗、在《庞克与乐趣》(Punch and Fun)上发表的滑稽诗歌、工人阶级和殖民地民谣以及为客厅游戏而写的十四行诗。在此,我想为诗歌研究提供一条途径,那就是在不同的背景下,重新回到具体的轻诗歌这一主题--除了最近关于无意义诗歌的研究之外,这一庞大的诗歌库仍未得到充分探索5:随着女诗人传统的影响在 19 世纪后期开始减弱,女诗人越来越多地采用新的 [第 531 页] 作者身份,她们是如何继承轻快诗的衣钵的?我选择了一个典型的例子进行探讨,她就是诗人梅-肯德尔(1861-1943 年),玛丽恩-泰恩(Marion Thain)在第一期《维多利亚诗歌何去何从》特刊的一篇著名文章中提到了她。2003 年,在最近一波恢复维多利亚时期非经典女诗人作品的学术浪潮之后,泰恩利用梅-肯德尔来提出"'女性诗歌'是一个什么样的批评类别?"6 这一问题。简而言之,它应具有最大限度的扩展性,以涵盖 19 世纪所涉及的全部主题、所采用的人物形象以及所应用和创新的形式模式。正如她当时所指出的,扩展的关键时期是 19 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代,在这一时期,女诗人越来越多地跳出常见的女诗人题材的束缚,如家庭、基督教慰藉和残缺的浪漫。她建议,无论何时,我们都应将 "女性诗歌 "一词翻译为 "女性诗歌",明确承认这些人物所承担的多重性别立场,尤其是在本世纪的最后二十年(第 582 页)。在此,我试图接受泰恩的邀请,探讨泰恩文章中未涉及的肯德尔诗歌的一个方面:7 在这两部诗集中,肯德尔为自己的目的改编和再创作了轻诗歌这一典型的男性化领域,处理最新的科学主题。肯德尔作为喜剧诗人的能力在她所处的时代就得到了认可:正如泰恩在阿尔弗雷德-亨利-迈尔斯的《世纪诗人与诗歌》(他在 19 世纪 90 年代出版的 10 卷本选集系列)中所指出的,肯德尔是唯一一位被收录在 "幽默、社会、戏仿和偶发诗歌 "专卷中的女诗人;所有其他女诗人都被限制在女性诗歌或宗教诗歌专卷中。当我们比较...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Women and Light Verse: On May Kendall
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Women and Light Verse: On May Kendall
  • Lee Behlman (bio)

Several years ago, I wrote in Victorian Poetry about the long history and shifting critical conceptions of light verse, or what for much of the nineteenth century was called vers de société.1 This was verse typically set in a refined social milieu, with a male speaker, and having the qualities of what one nineteenth-century critic, Frederic Locker-Lampson, called “brevity and buoyancy.”2 Exploring the work of practitioners and critics of the form, I noted that a specifically comic register, while never excluded, was not viewed as its essential characteristic until the early twentieth century. Before then, vers de société “dwelled in a conceptual middle ground defined by balance and detachment—emotional, formal, even philosophical,” including “an Enlightenment-era aesthetic of poised, ‘polished’ form; an emotional tenor set between raucous humor and tragedy; and a philosophic position of detachment from and acceptance of life’s suffering.”3 That essay became a point of departure for a broader exploration of the critical potential for the study of verse as an alternative to its ostensibly more elevated counterpart, poetry, that I undertook with Olivia Loksing Moy. In the introduction to our edited collection, Victorian Verse: The Poetics of Everyday Life (2023), we offer what we term “verse studies” as a framework for engaging with the vast poetic output of the nineteenth century, in order “to counter critical tendencies that have long narrowed our curricula and our scholarly practices.”4 Our contributors explore such subjects as the crucial periodical contexts for most Victorian verse production as well as verse forms such as ballades and rondels, hymns, children’s poetry, comic verse published in Punch and Fun, working-class and colonial ballads, and sonnets written for parlor games.

A pathway that I’d like to offer here for verse studies is to return to the subject of specifically light verse—a vast corpus that, with the notable exception of recent work on nonsense verse, remains underexplored5—in a different context: How did women poets, who increasingly adopted new [End Page 531] authorial personas as the influence of the poetess tradition began to wane in the later nineteenth century, take up the mantle of lightness? I’ve selected a signal example to explore, the poet May Kendall (1861–1943), a figure invoked by Marion Thain in a notable essay from the first Whither Victorian Poetry? special issue. In 2003, after a recent wave of scholarship recovering the work of non-canonical Victorian women poets, Thain used May Kendall to frame the question “What Kind of a Critical Category Is ‘Women’s Poetry?’”6 Thain’s answer was pragmatic. In short, it should be maximally expansive, to cover the full range of topics addressed, personas adopted, and formal modes applied and innovated in the nineteenth century. As she noted then, the crucial period of expansion was the 1880s and 1890s, when women poets increasingly operated outside of the constraints of common poetess topoi such as domesticity, Christian consolation, and wrecked romance. She suggested that whenever we hear it, we translate the term “women’s poetry” into “women’s poetries,” explicitly acknowledging the multiple gendered positions that these figures assumed, especially in the last two decades of the century (p. 582). I’m seeking here to take up Thain’s invitation by exploring an aspect of Kendall’s verse not addressed in Thain’s essay: Kendall’s variant adaptations of modes of “lightness” in her early poetry, including the volumes Dreams to Sell (1887) and Songs from Dreamland (1894).7 In both of these collections, Kendall adapts and reworks the typically masculine territory of light verse for her own ends, treating the latest scientific subjects.

Kendall’s proficiency as a comic poet was recognized in her own time: as Thain notes in Alfred Henry Miles’s The Poets and Poetry of the Century (his 10-volume anthology series published in the 1890s), Kendall was the only female poet included in the volume devoted to “Humour, Society, Parody and Occasional Verse”; all other women poets were confined to the volumes dedicated to poetry by women or on religious verse. When we compare...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry Keeping Faith in Victorian Poetry Reflections on Twenty Years in Victorian Poetry Victorian Women's Poetry and the Near-Death Experience of a Category Undisciplining Art Sisterhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1