R. Elizabeth Capps, Steven W. Evans, Julie Sarno Owens, Darcey M. Allan
{"title":"针对有注意力问题的青少年的同伴支持型学校参与干预措施:开发与实施","authors":"R. Elizabeth Capps, Steven W. Evans, Julie Sarno Owens, Darcey M. Allan","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09697-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Youth with attention problems are at increased risk for school disengagement (Booster et al., JAD 16:179–189, 2012; DuPaul & Langberg, in: Barkley (ed), Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, Guilford, New York, 2014), which portends risk for poor outcomes (Bond et al., JAH 40:357.e9–357, 2007; Carter et al., JA 30:51–62, 2007; Fredricks et al., RER 74:59–109, 2004). Interventions that target school engagement may benefit from peer delivery because peers are widely available in schools and potentially more credible than adults. In this study, a peer-supported school-based school engagement intervention for middle school students with attention problems, Together Engaging and Achieving Meaningfully (TEAM) was developed with educators and students. In initial development (Study One), community development team meetings with partners (<i>N</i> = 9 school staff and students) were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes used to refine TEAM. In Study Two, a single-case pilot with one student with attention problems and one peer coach was conducted. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, and satisfaction were collected. Results were used to refine TEAM. Then in pilot implementation (Study Three), a non-randomized pilot was conducted with 10 fifth- through seventh-grade students with attention problems (<i>n</i> = 6 in the intervention group) and six eighth-grade coaches. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, satisfaction, and clinician-required time for implementation were collected. Cohen’s <i>d</i> mean difference effect sizes were calculated between and within groups over implementation. Feedback from partners highlighted barriers and aspects that were acceptable and feasible. Results from implementation suggested high attendance, high coach fidelity with revised implementation support, and low clinician-required time. Lessons learned and avenues for future development and research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Peer-Supported School Engagement Intervention for Youth with Attention Problems: Development and Implementation\",\"authors\":\"R. Elizabeth Capps, Steven W. Evans, Julie Sarno Owens, Darcey M. Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12310-024-09697-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Youth with attention problems are at increased risk for school disengagement (Booster et al., JAD 16:179–189, 2012; DuPaul & Langberg, in: Barkley (ed), Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, Guilford, New York, 2014), which portends risk for poor outcomes (Bond et al., JAH 40:357.e9–357, 2007; Carter et al., JA 30:51–62, 2007; Fredricks et al., RER 74:59–109, 2004). Interventions that target school engagement may benefit from peer delivery because peers are widely available in schools and potentially more credible than adults. In this study, a peer-supported school-based school engagement intervention for middle school students with attention problems, Together Engaging and Achieving Meaningfully (TEAM) was developed with educators and students. In initial development (Study One), community development team meetings with partners (<i>N</i> = 9 school staff and students) were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes used to refine TEAM. In Study Two, a single-case pilot with one student with attention problems and one peer coach was conducted. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, and satisfaction were collected. Results were used to refine TEAM. Then in pilot implementation (Study Three), a non-randomized pilot was conducted with 10 fifth- through seventh-grade students with attention problems (<i>n</i> = 6 in the intervention group) and six eighth-grade coaches. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, satisfaction, and clinician-required time for implementation were collected. Cohen’s <i>d</i> mean difference effect sizes were calculated between and within groups over implementation. Feedback from partners highlighted barriers and aspects that were acceptable and feasible. Results from implementation suggested high attendance, high coach fidelity with revised implementation support, and low clinician-required time. Lessons learned and avenues for future development and research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09697-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09697-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有注意力问题的青少年脱离学校的风险更高(Booster 等人,JAD 16:179-189, 2012;DuPaul & Langberg, in:巴克利(编),《注意力缺陷/多动障碍》:A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, Guilford, New York, 2014),这预示着不良后果的风险(Bond 等人,JAH 40:357.e9-357, 2007;Carter 等人,JA 30:51-62, 2007;Fredricks 等人,RER 74:59-109, 2004)。针对学校参与的干预可能会受益于同伴的传递,因为同伴在学校中广泛存在,而且可能比成年人更可信。在本研究中,我们与教育工作者和学生共同开发了一种针对有注意力问题的中学生的同伴支持型校本学校参与干预措施--"共同参与,实现理想"(TEAM)。在最初的开发阶段(研究一),社区开发团队与合作伙伴(9 名学校教职员工和学生)举行了会议。通过主题分析,确定了用于完善 TEAM 的主题。在 "研究二 "中,对一名有注意力问题的学生和一名同伴辅导员进行了单一案例试点。收集了关于忠实度、出勤率、可接受性和满意度的测量数据。研究结果用于改进 TEAM。然后,在试点实施阶段(研究三),对 10 名有注意力问题的五年级至七年级学生(干预组 6 人)和 6 名八年级教练进行了非随机试点。研究收集了关于忠实度、出勤率、可接受性、满意度和临床医生实施所需时间的测量数据。在实施过程中,计算了组间和组内的 Cohen'd 平均差异效应大小。合作伙伴的反馈意见强调了障碍以及可接受和可行的方面。实施结果表明,参加人数多、教练对修订后的实施支持忠实度高、临床医生所需的时间少。本文讨论了吸取的经验教训以及未来发展和研究的途径。
A Peer-Supported School Engagement Intervention for Youth with Attention Problems: Development and Implementation
Youth with attention problems are at increased risk for school disengagement (Booster et al., JAD 16:179–189, 2012; DuPaul & Langberg, in: Barkley (ed), Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, Guilford, New York, 2014), which portends risk for poor outcomes (Bond et al., JAH 40:357.e9–357, 2007; Carter et al., JA 30:51–62, 2007; Fredricks et al., RER 74:59–109, 2004). Interventions that target school engagement may benefit from peer delivery because peers are widely available in schools and potentially more credible than adults. In this study, a peer-supported school-based school engagement intervention for middle school students with attention problems, Together Engaging and Achieving Meaningfully (TEAM) was developed with educators and students. In initial development (Study One), community development team meetings with partners (N = 9 school staff and students) were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes used to refine TEAM. In Study Two, a single-case pilot with one student with attention problems and one peer coach was conducted. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, and satisfaction were collected. Results were used to refine TEAM. Then in pilot implementation (Study Three), a non-randomized pilot was conducted with 10 fifth- through seventh-grade students with attention problems (n = 6 in the intervention group) and six eighth-grade coaches. Measures of fidelity, attendance, acceptability, satisfaction, and clinician-required time for implementation were collected. Cohen’s d mean difference effect sizes were calculated between and within groups over implementation. Feedback from partners highlighted barriers and aspects that were acceptable and feasible. Results from implementation suggested high attendance, high coach fidelity with revised implementation support, and low clinician-required time. Lessons learned and avenues for future development and research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing. Sample topics include: · Innovative school-based treatment practices· Consultation and professional development procedures· Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools· Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders· Schoolwide prevention programs· Medication effects on school behavior and achievement· Assessment practices· Special education services· Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior· Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues· School policy· Role of families in school mental health· Prediction of impairment and resilience· Moderators and mediators of response to treatment