{"title":"作为复杂性类别的实数存在论:简编","authors":"Marcus Schaefer, Jean Cardinal, Tillmann Miltzow","doi":"arxiv-2407.18006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We survey the complexity class $\\exists \\mathbb{R}$, which captures the\ncomplexity of deciding the existential theory of the reals. The class $\\exists\n\\mathbb{R}$ has roots in two different traditions, one based on the\nBlum-Shub-Smale model of real computation, and the other following work by\nMn\\\"{e}v and Shor on the universality of realization spaces of oriented\nmatroids. Over the years the number of problems for which $\\exists \\mathbb{R}$\nrather than NP has turned out to be the proper way of measuring their\ncomplexity has grown, particularly in the fields of computational geometry,\ngraph drawing, game theory, and some areas in logic and algebra. $\\exists\n\\mathbb{R}$ has also started appearing in the context of machine learning,\nMarkov decision processes, and probabilistic reasoning. We have aimed at collecting a comprehensive compendium of problems complete\nand hard for $\\exists \\mathbb{R}$, as well as a long list of open problems. The\ncompendium is presented in the third part of our survey; a tour through the\ncompendium and the areas it touches on makes up the second part. The first part\nintroduces the reader to the existential theory of the reals as a complexity\nclass, discussing its history, motivation and prospects as well as some\ntechnical aspects.","PeriodicalId":501208,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Existential Theory of the Reals as a Complexity Class: A Compendium\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Schaefer, Jean Cardinal, Tillmann Miltzow\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.18006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We survey the complexity class $\\\\exists \\\\mathbb{R}$, which captures the\\ncomplexity of deciding the existential theory of the reals. The class $\\\\exists\\n\\\\mathbb{R}$ has roots in two different traditions, one based on the\\nBlum-Shub-Smale model of real computation, and the other following work by\\nMn\\\\\\\"{e}v and Shor on the universality of realization spaces of oriented\\nmatroids. Over the years the number of problems for which $\\\\exists \\\\mathbb{R}$\\nrather than NP has turned out to be the proper way of measuring their\\ncomplexity has grown, particularly in the fields of computational geometry,\\ngraph drawing, game theory, and some areas in logic and algebra. $\\\\exists\\n\\\\mathbb{R}$ has also started appearing in the context of machine learning,\\nMarkov decision processes, and probabilistic reasoning. We have aimed at collecting a comprehensive compendium of problems complete\\nand hard for $\\\\exists \\\\mathbb{R}$, as well as a long list of open problems. The\\ncompendium is presented in the third part of our survey; a tour through the\\ncompendium and the areas it touches on makes up the second part. The first part\\nintroduces the reader to the existential theory of the reals as a complexity\\nclass, discussing its history, motivation and prospects as well as some\\ntechnical aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.18006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.18006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Existential Theory of the Reals as a Complexity Class: A Compendium
We survey the complexity class $\exists \mathbb{R}$, which captures the
complexity of deciding the existential theory of the reals. The class $\exists
\mathbb{R}$ has roots in two different traditions, one based on the
Blum-Shub-Smale model of real computation, and the other following work by
Mn\"{e}v and Shor on the universality of realization spaces of oriented
matroids. Over the years the number of problems for which $\exists \mathbb{R}$
rather than NP has turned out to be the proper way of measuring their
complexity has grown, particularly in the fields of computational geometry,
graph drawing, game theory, and some areas in logic and algebra. $\exists
\mathbb{R}$ has also started appearing in the context of machine learning,
Markov decision processes, and probabilistic reasoning. We have aimed at collecting a comprehensive compendium of problems complete
and hard for $\exists \mathbb{R}$, as well as a long list of open problems. The
compendium is presented in the third part of our survey; a tour through the
compendium and the areas it touches on makes up the second part. The first part
introduces the reader to the existential theory of the reals as a complexity
class, discussing its history, motivation and prospects as well as some
technical aspects.