我的本体论者评估基于 BFO 的定义支持人工智能

Carter Benson, Alec Sculley, Austin Liebers, John Beverley
{"title":"我的本体论者评估基于 BFO 的定义支持人工智能","authors":"Carter Benson, Alec Sculley, Austin Liebers, John Beverley","doi":"arxiv-2407.17657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of\nGPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large\nlanguage models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and\nknowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for\norganizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with\nactual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated\nreasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of\nontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic\nFormal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.\nThis study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support\nontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT\nmodel named \"My Ontologist,\" we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.\nInitial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and\nleveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by\nadhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of\nGPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings\nunderscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level\nstandards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI\ncapabilities in ontology engineering.","PeriodicalId":501123,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Databases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support\",\"authors\":\"Carter Benson, Alec Sculley, Austin Liebers, John Beverley\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.17657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of\\nGPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large\\nlanguage models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and\\nknowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for\\norganizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with\\nactual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated\\nreasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of\\nontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic\\nFormal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.\\nThis study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support\\nontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT\\nmodel named \\\"My Ontologist,\\\" we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.\\nInitial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and\\nleveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by\\nadhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of\\nGPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings\\nunderscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level\\nstandards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI\\ncapabilities in ontology engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Databases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Databases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Databases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.17657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以 2022 年发布的 GPT-3.5 为代表的生成人工智能(AI)极大地推动了大型语言模型(LLM)的潜在应用,包括本体开发和知识图谱创建领域。本体是组织信息的结构化框架,知识图谱则将本体与实际数据相结合,对于实现互操作性和自动推理至关重要。然而,目前的研究在很大程度上忽视了从已有的上层框架(如基本规范本体(BFO))延伸出的本体的生成,这有可能造成不可整合的本体孤岛。通过迭代开发名为 "我的本体论者 "的专用GPT模型,我们旨在生成符合BFO的本体。My Ontologist 3.0通过坚持结构化规则和模块化本体套件显示出了前景,然而GPT-4o的发布通过改变模型的行为破坏了这一进展。我们的发现强调了使 LLM 生成的本体与顶级标准保持一致的重要性,并突出了在本体工程中整合不断发展的人工智能能力的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for organizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with actual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated reasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of ontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos. This study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support ontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT model named "My Ontologist," we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies. Initial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and leveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by adhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of GPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings underscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level standards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI capabilities in ontology engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Data Evaluation Benchmark for Data Wrangling Recommendation System Messy Code Makes Managing ML Pipelines Difficult? Just Let LLMs Rewrite the Code! Fast and Adaptive Bulk Loading of Multidimensional Points Matrix Profile for Anomaly Detection on Multidimensional Time Series Extending predictive process monitoring for collaborative processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1