我们能否通过开发人员测试发现能量倒退?

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Empirical Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s10664-023-10429-1
Benjamin Danglot, Jean-Rémy Falleri, Romain Rouvoy
{"title":"我们能否通过开发人员测试发现能量倒退?","authors":"Benjamin Danglot, Jean-Rémy Falleri, Romain Rouvoy","doi":"10.1007/s10664-023-10429-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Context</b>\n</h3><p><i>Software Energy Consumption</i> is gaining more and more attention. In this paper, we tackle the problem of warning developers about the increase of SEC of their programs during <i>Continuous Integration</i> (CI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Objective</b>\n</h3><p>In this study, we investigate if the CI can leverage developers’ tests to perform <i>energy regression testing</i>. Energy regression is similar to performance regression but focuses on the energy consumption of the program instead of standard performance indicators, like execution time or memory consumption.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Method</b>\n</h3><p>We perform an exploratory study of the usage of developers’ tests for energy regression testing. We first investigate if developers’ tests can be used to obtain stable SEC indicators. Then, we evaluate if comparing the SEC of developers’ tests between two versions can pinpoint energy regressions introduced by automated program mutations. Finally, we manually evaluate several real commits pinpointed by our approach.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Results</b>\n</h3><p>Our study will pave the way for automated SEC regression tools that can be readily deployed inside an existing CI infrastructure to raise awareness of SEC issues among practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we spot energy regressions using developers tests?\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Danglot, Jean-Rémy Falleri, Romain Rouvoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10664-023-10429-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">\\n<b>Context</b>\\n</h3><p><i>Software Energy Consumption</i> is gaining more and more attention. In this paper, we tackle the problem of warning developers about the increase of SEC of their programs during <i>Continuous Integration</i> (CI).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">\\n<b>Objective</b>\\n</h3><p>In this study, we investigate if the CI can leverage developers’ tests to perform <i>energy regression testing</i>. Energy regression is similar to performance regression but focuses on the energy consumption of the program instead of standard performance indicators, like execution time or memory consumption.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">\\n<b>Method</b>\\n</h3><p>We perform an exploratory study of the usage of developers’ tests for energy regression testing. We first investigate if developers’ tests can be used to obtain stable SEC indicators. Then, we evaluate if comparing the SEC of developers’ tests between two versions can pinpoint energy regressions introduced by automated program mutations. Finally, we manually evaluate several real commits pinpointed by our approach.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">\\n<b>Results</b>\\n</h3><p>Our study will pave the way for automated SEC regression tools that can be readily deployed inside an existing CI infrastructure to raise awareness of SEC issues among practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10429-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10429-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景软件能源消耗越来越受到关注。在本文中,我们要解决的问题是在持续集成(CI)过程中向开发人员发出关于其程序能耗增加的警告。能源回归与性能回归类似,但重点是程序的能源消耗,而不是标准的性能指标,如执行时间或内存消耗。我们首先研究开发人员测试是否能用于获得稳定的 SEC 指标。然后,我们评估了在两个版本之间比较开发人员测试的 SEC 是否能准确定位自动程序突变带来的能耗回归。结果我们的研究将为自动 SEC 回归工具铺平道路,这些工具可随时部署在现有的 CI 基础架构中,以提高从业人员对 SEC 问题的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can we spot energy regressions using developers tests?

Context

Software Energy Consumption is gaining more and more attention. In this paper, we tackle the problem of warning developers about the increase of SEC of their programs during Continuous Integration (CI).

Objective

In this study, we investigate if the CI can leverage developers’ tests to perform energy regression testing. Energy regression is similar to performance regression but focuses on the energy consumption of the program instead of standard performance indicators, like execution time or memory consumption.

Method

We perform an exploratory study of the usage of developers’ tests for energy regression testing. We first investigate if developers’ tests can be used to obtain stable SEC indicators. Then, we evaluate if comparing the SEC of developers’ tests between two versions can pinpoint energy regressions introduced by automated program mutations. Finally, we manually evaluate several real commits pinpointed by our approach.

Results

Our study will pave the way for automated SEC regression tools that can be readily deployed inside an existing CI infrastructure to raise awareness of SEC issues among practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues Quality issues in machine learning software systems An empirical study of token-based micro commits Software product line testing: a systematic literature review Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1