澳大利亚和埃塞俄比亚香根草种植下的土壤碳组分与其他土地利用的比较

IF 3.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s42729-024-01933-4
Bezaye Tessema, Jeff A. Baldock, Heiko Daniel, Paul Kristiansen, Zenebe Adimassu, Brian Wilson
{"title":"澳大利亚和埃塞俄比亚香根草种植下的土壤碳组分与其他土地利用的比较","authors":"Bezaye Tessema, Jeff A. Baldock, Heiko Daniel, Paul Kristiansen, Zenebe Adimassu, Brian Wilson","doi":"10.1007/s42729-024-01933-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The allocation of soil organic carbon (SOC) to its component fractions can indicate the vulnerability of organic carbon stocks to change. The impact of vetiver on the composition and distribution of SOC can provide a complete assessment of its potential to sequester carbon in soil.</p><p><i>Purpose</i>: This study quantified the distribution and impact of SOC under vetiver and the allocation of SOC to particulate (POC), humus (HOC) and resistant (ROC) fractions differentiated based on particle size and chemical composition under vetiver grass compared with other plant types.</p><p><i>Methods</i>: Carbon fractions were measured on soil samples collected from Australia and Ethiopia to a depth of 1.0 m under three plant communities (vetiver, coffee, and Australian native pastures). We used the MIR/PLSR spectra to estimate SOC fractions based on fractionated, and NMR measured values.</p><p><i>Results</i>: The stocks of SOC fractions indicated significant differences in the proportion of labile POC to HOC across sites and vegetation types. The dominant carbon fraction was HOC (71%) for all vegetation types. The average carbon sequestration rate under vetiver for OC was − 2.64 to + 7.69 Mg C ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>, while for the POC, HOC and ROC was 0.04 to + 1.17, -3.36 to + 4.64 and − 0.35 to + 1.51 Mg C ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>, respectively.</p><p><i>Conclusion</i>: Growing vetiver and undisturbed native pastures has on average a high accumulation rate of a more stable carbon (HOC) which is less vulnerable to change, and change was largely driven by the HOC fraction. We, therefore, recommend the use and promotion of perennial tropical grasses like vetiver and similar grasses and undisturbed native pastures as potential options to facilitate soil carbon sequestration.</p>","PeriodicalId":17042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil Carbon Fractions under Vetiver Grass in Australia and Ethiopia Relative to other Land Uses\",\"authors\":\"Bezaye Tessema, Jeff A. Baldock, Heiko Daniel, Paul Kristiansen, Zenebe Adimassu, Brian Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42729-024-01933-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The allocation of soil organic carbon (SOC) to its component fractions can indicate the vulnerability of organic carbon stocks to change. The impact of vetiver on the composition and distribution of SOC can provide a complete assessment of its potential to sequester carbon in soil.</p><p><i>Purpose</i>: This study quantified the distribution and impact of SOC under vetiver and the allocation of SOC to particulate (POC), humus (HOC) and resistant (ROC) fractions differentiated based on particle size and chemical composition under vetiver grass compared with other plant types.</p><p><i>Methods</i>: Carbon fractions were measured on soil samples collected from Australia and Ethiopia to a depth of 1.0 m under three plant communities (vetiver, coffee, and Australian native pastures). We used the MIR/PLSR spectra to estimate SOC fractions based on fractionated, and NMR measured values.</p><p><i>Results</i>: The stocks of SOC fractions indicated significant differences in the proportion of labile POC to HOC across sites and vegetation types. The dominant carbon fraction was HOC (71%) for all vegetation types. The average carbon sequestration rate under vetiver for OC was − 2.64 to + 7.69 Mg C ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>, while for the POC, HOC and ROC was 0.04 to + 1.17, -3.36 to + 4.64 and − 0.35 to + 1.51 Mg C ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>, respectively.</p><p><i>Conclusion</i>: Growing vetiver and undisturbed native pastures has on average a high accumulation rate of a more stable carbon (HOC) which is less vulnerable to change, and change was largely driven by the HOC fraction. We, therefore, recommend the use and promotion of perennial tropical grasses like vetiver and similar grasses and undisturbed native pastures as potential options to facilitate soil carbon sequestration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01933-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01933-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤有机碳(SOC)在各组分中的分配可以表明有机碳储量易受变化影响的程度。目的:与其他植物类型相比,本研究量化了香根草作用下土壤有机碳的分布和影响,以及香根草作用下土壤有机碳在颗粒(POC)、腐殖质(HOC)和抗性(ROC)组分中的分配情况:测量了从澳大利亚和埃塞俄比亚采集的三种植物群落(香根草、咖啡和澳大利亚本地牧场)下 1.0 米深的土壤样本的碳组分。我们使用 MIR/PLSR 光谱根据分馏值和 NMR 测量值估算 SOC 分数:结果:SOC 分馏存量表明,在不同地点和植被类型中,可溶性 POC 与 HOC 的比例存在显著差异。在所有植被类型中,主要的碳组分是 HOC(71%)。在香根草的作用下,OC 的平均固碳率为 - 2.64 至 + 7.69 Mg C ha- 1 yr- 1,而 POC、HOC 和 ROC 的平均固碳率分别为 0.04 至 + 1.17、-3.36 至 + 4.64 和 - 0.35 至 + 1.51 Mg C ha- 1 yr- 1:生长中的香根草和未受干扰的原生牧草平均具有较高的较稳定碳(HOC)积累率,而较稳定碳不易受变化影响,变化主要由 HOC 部分驱动。因此,我们建议使用和推广香根草等多年生热带牧草和类似牧草以及未受干扰的原生牧草,将其作为促进土壤固碳的潜在选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil Carbon Fractions under Vetiver Grass in Australia and Ethiopia Relative to other Land Uses

The allocation of soil organic carbon (SOC) to its component fractions can indicate the vulnerability of organic carbon stocks to change. The impact of vetiver on the composition and distribution of SOC can provide a complete assessment of its potential to sequester carbon in soil.

Purpose: This study quantified the distribution and impact of SOC under vetiver and the allocation of SOC to particulate (POC), humus (HOC) and resistant (ROC) fractions differentiated based on particle size and chemical composition under vetiver grass compared with other plant types.

Methods: Carbon fractions were measured on soil samples collected from Australia and Ethiopia to a depth of 1.0 m under three plant communities (vetiver, coffee, and Australian native pastures). We used the MIR/PLSR spectra to estimate SOC fractions based on fractionated, and NMR measured values.

Results: The stocks of SOC fractions indicated significant differences in the proportion of labile POC to HOC across sites and vegetation types. The dominant carbon fraction was HOC (71%) for all vegetation types. The average carbon sequestration rate under vetiver for OC was − 2.64 to + 7.69 Mg C ha− 1 yr− 1, while for the POC, HOC and ROC was 0.04 to + 1.17, -3.36 to + 4.64 and − 0.35 to + 1.51 Mg C ha− 1 yr− 1, respectively.

Conclusion: Growing vetiver and undisturbed native pastures has on average a high accumulation rate of a more stable carbon (HOC) which is less vulnerable to change, and change was largely driven by the HOC fraction. We, therefore, recommend the use and promotion of perennial tropical grasses like vetiver and similar grasses and undisturbed native pastures as potential options to facilitate soil carbon sequestration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
331
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is an international, peer reviewed journal devoted to publishing original research findings in the areas of soil science, plant nutrition, agriculture and environmental science. Soil sciences submissions may cover physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, mineralogy, ecology, pedology, soil classification and amelioration. Plant nutrition and agriculture submissions may include plant production, physiology and metabolism of plants, plant ecology, diversity and sustainability of agricultural systems, organic and inorganic fertilization in relation to their impact on yields, quality of plants and ecological systems, and agroecosystems studies. Submissions covering soil degradation, environmental pollution, nature conservation, and environmental protection are also welcome. The journal considers for publication original research articles, technical notes, short communication, and reviews (both voluntary and by invitation), and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Soil Nematodes in Agroecosystems: Linking Cropping System’s Rhizosphere Ecology to Nematode Structure and Function Nanobiochar-Coating Regulates N and P Release from DAP Fertilizer in Soil and Improves Maize Crop Productivity Single-Strain Inoculation of Bacillus subtilis and Rhizobium phaseoli Affects Nitrogen Acquisition of an Improved Mungbean Cultivar Apple-Based Farming Systems Improve Production and Rhizosphere Microbiome in The North-West Himalayan Region's Dry Temperate Environment Biochar Amendments to Improve Soil Phosphorus Fertility and Retention in Canadian Prairie Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1