评估自闭症成人多疗程在线情绪识别训练的效果

Zoe E Reed, Oliver Bastiani, Andy Eastwood, Ian S Penton-Voak, Christopher Jarrold, Marcus R Munafo, Angela S Attwood
{"title":"评估自闭症成人多疗程在线情绪识别训练的效果","authors":"Zoe E Reed, Oliver Bastiani, Andy Eastwood, Ian S Penton-Voak, Christopher Jarrold, Marcus R Munafo, Angela S Attwood","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Difficulties with emotion recognition can occur in neurodevelopmental conditions, including in autistic individuals. Providing interventions to support this would therefore be beneficial, particularly in terms of downstream effects on wellbeing, social relationships and education. Methods: In this online experimental study, we examined the effect of a recently developed facial emotion recognition training task versus a sham/control task in an adult population identifying as autistic over four sessions in a 2-week period, with a fifth follow-up session (N=184). Results: Our main analyses showed that facial emotion recognition accuracy was greater in Session 4 in the active group, with an estimated improvement of 14% (equivalent to approximately 7 additional correct responses), compared to 2% (equivalent to approximately 1 additional correct responses) in the sham group. Additional analyses suggested training effects were generalisable to facial stimuli that participants had not been trained on and were still present, although attenuated, two weeks later. We also observed some self-reported improvements in social interactions post-training. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated improved emotion recognition in an adult autistic sample with this training task. Future work is needed to investigate the effect of this emotion recognition training on emotion recognition accuracy in autistic children, where support could be most beneficial.","PeriodicalId":501388,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of multi-session online emotion recognition training in autistic adults\",\"authors\":\"Zoe E Reed, Oliver Bastiani, Andy Eastwood, Ian S Penton-Voak, Christopher Jarrold, Marcus R Munafo, Angela S Attwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Difficulties with emotion recognition can occur in neurodevelopmental conditions, including in autistic individuals. Providing interventions to support this would therefore be beneficial, particularly in terms of downstream effects on wellbeing, social relationships and education. Methods: In this online experimental study, we examined the effect of a recently developed facial emotion recognition training task versus a sham/control task in an adult population identifying as autistic over four sessions in a 2-week period, with a fifth follow-up session (N=184). Results: Our main analyses showed that facial emotion recognition accuracy was greater in Session 4 in the active group, with an estimated improvement of 14% (equivalent to approximately 7 additional correct responses), compared to 2% (equivalent to approximately 1 additional correct responses) in the sham group. Additional analyses suggested training effects were generalisable to facial stimuli that participants had not been trained on and were still present, although attenuated, two weeks later. We also observed some self-reported improvements in social interactions post-training. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated improved emotion recognition in an adult autistic sample with this training task. Future work is needed to investigate the effect of this emotion recognition training on emotion recognition accuracy in autistic children, where support could be most beneficial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:包括自闭症患者在内的神经发育障碍患者可能会出现情绪识别困难。因此,提供干预措施以支持这种情况将是有益的,尤其是在对福祉、社会关系和教育的下游影响方面。研究方法在这项在线实验研究中,我们对最近开发的面部情绪识别训练任务与假/对照任务的效果进行了对比研究,研究对象是自闭症成人,在为期两周的时间内进行了四次训练,并进行了第五次随访(N=184)。结果显示我们的主要分析表明,在第 4 次训练中,积极训练组的面部情绪识别准确率更高,估计提高了 14%(相当于增加了约 7 个正确反应),而虚假训练组仅提高了 2%(相当于增加了约 1 个正确反应)。其他分析表明,训练效果可以推广到参与者未接受过训练的面部刺激上,并且在两周后仍然存在,尽管有所减弱。我们还观察到一些自我报告的训练后社交互动的改善情况。结论总的来说,这项研究表明,通过这项训练任务,成年自闭症样本的情绪识别能力有所提高。今后的工作需要研究这种情绪识别训练对自闭症儿童情绪识别准确性的影响,因为对自闭症儿童的支持可能最有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the effectiveness of multi-session online emotion recognition training in autistic adults
Purpose: Difficulties with emotion recognition can occur in neurodevelopmental conditions, including in autistic individuals. Providing interventions to support this would therefore be beneficial, particularly in terms of downstream effects on wellbeing, social relationships and education. Methods: In this online experimental study, we examined the effect of a recently developed facial emotion recognition training task versus a sham/control task in an adult population identifying as autistic over four sessions in a 2-week period, with a fifth follow-up session (N=184). Results: Our main analyses showed that facial emotion recognition accuracy was greater in Session 4 in the active group, with an estimated improvement of 14% (equivalent to approximately 7 additional correct responses), compared to 2% (equivalent to approximately 1 additional correct responses) in the sham group. Additional analyses suggested training effects were generalisable to facial stimuli that participants had not been trained on and were still present, although attenuated, two weeks later. We also observed some self-reported improvements in social interactions post-training. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated improved emotion recognition in an adult autistic sample with this training task. Future work is needed to investigate the effect of this emotion recognition training on emotion recognition accuracy in autistic children, where support could be most beneficial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Socio-medical Factors Associated with Neurodevelopmental Disorders on the Kenyan Coast Relationship between blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier integrity, cardiometabolic and inflammatory factors in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders Whole-exome sequencing study of opioid dependence offers novel insights into the contributions of exome variants Mayo Normative Studies: regression-based normative data for remote self-administration of the Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite and validation in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and dementia EEG frontal alpha asymmetry mediates the association between maternal and child internalizing symptoms in childhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1