{"title":"营销领导力的架构:高层管理团队中营销存在的不同结构如何推动新产品的绩效","authors":"Hamed Mehrabi, Yongjian (Ken) Chen, Chatura Ranaweera","doi":"10.1108/mip-10-2023-0582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Prior research seldom explores the different structures of marketing presence in the top management team (MPTMT) and their impact on new product performance. In this paper, we distinguish among three structures of MPTMT: (1) a dedicated MPTMT; (2) a joint marketing and sales MPTMT; and (3) a joint marketing and other operations MPTMT. We then examine how these three structures of MPTMT are related to cross-functional integration in NPD and, subsequently, new product performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Path analysis is used to test the model using data collected from 139 U.S. manufacturing firms. We conducted two rounds of survey data collection (with a one-year gap) to assess the potential effect of common method variance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that, compared with no MPTMT, all MPTMT structures positively affect cross-functional integration in NPD, which, in turn, enhances new product performance. However, joint MPTMT structures have a greater impact than a dedicated MPTMT. Our moderation analysis also reveals that as TMT heterogeneity increases, the effect of dedicated MPTMT diminishes, but the effects of the other two joint structures remain positive and stable.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The model could include alternative mediating organizational processes and performance outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings provide managers with insight on how to configure and leverage marketing influence in the upper echelons in both SMEs and large firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study highlight the importance of delineating MPTMT structures, understanding how they create value, and specifying their boundary conditions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48048,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"260 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The architecture of marketing leadership: how different structures of marketing presence in the top management team drive new product performance\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Mehrabi, Yongjian (Ken) Chen, Chatura Ranaweera\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mip-10-2023-0582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Prior research seldom explores the different structures of marketing presence in the top management team (MPTMT) and their impact on new product performance. In this paper, we distinguish among three structures of MPTMT: (1) a dedicated MPTMT; (2) a joint marketing and sales MPTMT; and (3) a joint marketing and other operations MPTMT. We then examine how these three structures of MPTMT are related to cross-functional integration in NPD and, subsequently, new product performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Path analysis is used to test the model using data collected from 139 U.S. manufacturing firms. We conducted two rounds of survey data collection (with a one-year gap) to assess the potential effect of common method variance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results show that, compared with no MPTMT, all MPTMT structures positively affect cross-functional integration in NPD, which, in turn, enhances new product performance. However, joint MPTMT structures have a greater impact than a dedicated MPTMT. Our moderation analysis also reveals that as TMT heterogeneity increases, the effect of dedicated MPTMT diminishes, but the effects of the other two joint structures remain positive and stable.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The model could include alternative mediating organizational processes and performance outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings provide managers with insight on how to configure and leverage marketing influence in the upper echelons in both SMEs and large firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The findings of this study highlight the importance of delineating MPTMT structures, understanding how they create value, and specifying their boundary conditions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marketing Intelligence & Planning\",\"volume\":\"260 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marketing Intelligence & Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-10-2023-0582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-10-2023-0582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The architecture of marketing leadership: how different structures of marketing presence in the top management team drive new product performance
Purpose
Prior research seldom explores the different structures of marketing presence in the top management team (MPTMT) and their impact on new product performance. In this paper, we distinguish among three structures of MPTMT: (1) a dedicated MPTMT; (2) a joint marketing and sales MPTMT; and (3) a joint marketing and other operations MPTMT. We then examine how these three structures of MPTMT are related to cross-functional integration in NPD and, subsequently, new product performance.
Design/methodology/approach
Path analysis is used to test the model using data collected from 139 U.S. manufacturing firms. We conducted two rounds of survey data collection (with a one-year gap) to assess the potential effect of common method variance.
Findings
The results show that, compared with no MPTMT, all MPTMT structures positively affect cross-functional integration in NPD, which, in turn, enhances new product performance. However, joint MPTMT structures have a greater impact than a dedicated MPTMT. Our moderation analysis also reveals that as TMT heterogeneity increases, the effect of dedicated MPTMT diminishes, but the effects of the other two joint structures remain positive and stable.
Research limitations/implications
The model could include alternative mediating organizational processes and performance outcomes.
Practical implications
The findings provide managers with insight on how to configure and leverage marketing influence in the upper echelons in both SMEs and large firms.
Originality/value
The findings of this study highlight the importance of delineating MPTMT structures, understanding how they create value, and specifying their boundary conditions.
期刊介绍:
Marketing Intelligence & Planning (MIP) facilitates communication between researchers and practitioners, providing the users of research with a wealth of robust and relevant information. At a time when some journals are losing their relevance to industry and practical requirements, MIP successfully offers a bridge between academic and practitioner thinking, while retaining a high level of scientific rigour.