结核病患者家庭接触者的非传染性疾病患病率:系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1111/tmi.14038
Yohhei Hamada, Matteo Quartagno, Farihah Malik, Keolebogile Ntshamane, Anna Tisler, Sanjay Gaikwad, Carlos Acuna‐Villaorduna, Perumal Kannabiran Bhavani, Bachti Alisjahbana, Katharina Ronacher, Lika Apriani, Mercedes Becerra, Alexander L. Chu, Jacob Creswell, Gustavo Diaz, Beatriz E. Ferro, Jerome T. Galea, Louis Grandjean, Harleen M. S. Grewal, Amita Gupta, Edward C. Jones‐López, Léanie Kleynhans, Leonid Lecca, Peter MacPherson, Megan Murray, Diana Marín, Blanca I. Restrepo, Shri Vijay Bala Yogendra Shivakumar, Eileen Shu, Dhanasekaran Sivakumaran, Luan Nguyen Quang Vo, Emily L. Webb, Andrew Copas, Ibrahim Abubakar, Molebogeng X. Rangaka
{"title":"结核病患者家庭接触者的非传染性疾病患病率:系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析","authors":"Yohhei Hamada, Matteo Quartagno, Farihah Malik, Keolebogile Ntshamane, Anna Tisler, Sanjay Gaikwad, Carlos Acuna‐Villaorduna, Perumal Kannabiran Bhavani, Bachti Alisjahbana, Katharina Ronacher, Lika Apriani, Mercedes Becerra, Alexander L. Chu, Jacob Creswell, Gustavo Diaz, Beatriz E. Ferro, Jerome T. Galea, Louis Grandjean, Harleen M. S. Grewal, Amita Gupta, Edward C. Jones‐López, Léanie Kleynhans, Leonid Lecca, Peter MacPherson, Megan Murray, Diana Marín, Blanca I. Restrepo, Shri Vijay Bala Yogendra Shivakumar, Eileen Shu, Dhanasekaran Sivakumaran, Luan Nguyen Quang Vo, Emily L. Webb, Andrew Copas, Ibrahim Abubakar, Molebogeng X. Rangaka","doi":"10.1111/tmi.14038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of non‐communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis. We searched Medline, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from inception to 16 May 2023. We included studies that assessed for at least one non‐communicable disease among household contacts of people with clinical tuberculosis. We estimated the non‐communicable disease prevalence through mixed effects logistic regression for studies providing individual participant data, and compared it with estimates from aggregated data meta‐analyses. Furthermore, we compared age and sex‐standardised non‐communicable disease prevalence with national‐level estimates standardised for age and sex.ResultsWe identified 39 eligible studies, of which 14 provided individual participant data (29,194 contacts). Of the remaining 25 studies, 18 studies reported aggregated data suitable for aggregated data meta‐analysis. In individual participant data analysis, the pooled prevalence of diabetes in studies that undertook biochemical testing was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%–14.9%, four studies). Age‐and sex‐standardised prevalence was higher in two studies (10.4% vs. 6.9% and 11.5% vs. 8.4%) than the corresponding national estimates and similar in two studies. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus based on self‐report or medical records was 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%–4.6%, 14 studies). Prevalence did not significantly differ compared to estimates from aggregated data meta‐analysis. There were limited data for other non‐communicable diseases.ConclusionThe prevalence of diabetes mellitus among household contacts was high while that of known diabetes was substantially lower, suggesting the underdiagnosis. tuberculosis household contact investigation offers opportunities to deliver multifaceted interventions to identify tuberculosis infection and disease, screen for non‐communicable diseases and address shared risk factors.","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of non‐communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yohhei Hamada, Matteo Quartagno, Farihah Malik, Keolebogile Ntshamane, Anna Tisler, Sanjay Gaikwad, Carlos Acuna‐Villaorduna, Perumal Kannabiran Bhavani, Bachti Alisjahbana, Katharina Ronacher, Lika Apriani, Mercedes Becerra, Alexander L. Chu, Jacob Creswell, Gustavo Diaz, Beatriz E. Ferro, Jerome T. Galea, Louis Grandjean, Harleen M. S. Grewal, Amita Gupta, Edward C. Jones‐López, Léanie Kleynhans, Leonid Lecca, Peter MacPherson, Megan Murray, Diana Marín, Blanca I. Restrepo, Shri Vijay Bala Yogendra Shivakumar, Eileen Shu, Dhanasekaran Sivakumaran, Luan Nguyen Quang Vo, Emily L. Webb, Andrew Copas, Ibrahim Abubakar, Molebogeng X. Rangaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tmi.14038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of non‐communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis. We searched Medline, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from inception to 16 May 2023. We included studies that assessed for at least one non‐communicable disease among household contacts of people with clinical tuberculosis. We estimated the non‐communicable disease prevalence through mixed effects logistic regression for studies providing individual participant data, and compared it with estimates from aggregated data meta‐analyses. Furthermore, we compared age and sex‐standardised non‐communicable disease prevalence with national‐level estimates standardised for age and sex.ResultsWe identified 39 eligible studies, of which 14 provided individual participant data (29,194 contacts). Of the remaining 25 studies, 18 studies reported aggregated data suitable for aggregated data meta‐analysis. In individual participant data analysis, the pooled prevalence of diabetes in studies that undertook biochemical testing was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%–14.9%, four studies). Age‐and sex‐standardised prevalence was higher in two studies (10.4% vs. 6.9% and 11.5% vs. 8.4%) than the corresponding national estimates and similar in two studies. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus based on self‐report or medical records was 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%–4.6%, 14 studies). Prevalence did not significantly differ compared to estimates from aggregated data meta‐analysis. There were limited data for other non‐communicable diseases.ConclusionThe prevalence of diabetes mellitus among household contacts was high while that of known diabetes was substantially lower, suggesting the underdiagnosis. tuberculosis household contact investigation offers opportunities to deliver multifaceted interventions to identify tuberculosis infection and disease, screen for non‐communicable diseases and address shared risk factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法我们进行了一项系统性综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Global Index Medicus 从开始到 2023 年 5 月 16 日的数据。我们纳入了对临床结核病患者的家庭接触者中至少一种非传染性疾病进行评估的研究。对于提供个体参与者数据的研究,我们通过混合效应逻辑回归估计了非传染性疾病的患病率,并将其与汇总数据荟萃分析的估计值进行了比较。此外,我们还将年龄和性别标准化的非传染性疾病患病率与国家级的年龄和性别标准化估计值进行了比较。结果我们确定了 39 项符合条件的研究,其中 14 项提供了个体参与者数据(29 194 名接触者)。在其余 25 项研究中,18 项研究报告了适合进行汇总数据荟萃分析的汇总数据。通过对个体参与者数据的分析,在进行了生化检测的研究中,糖尿病的汇总患病率为 8.8%(95% 置信区间 [CI],5.1%-14.9%,4 项研究)。在两项研究中,年龄和性别标准化患病率(10.4% 对 6.9% 和 11.5% 对 8.4%)高于相应的全国估计值,而在两项研究中,年龄和性别标准化患病率与全国估计值相近。根据自我报告或医疗记录得出的糖尿病患病率为 3.4%(95% CI 2.6%-4.6%,14 项研究)。与汇总数据荟萃分析的估计值相比,患病率没有明显差异。结论 家庭接触者中糖尿病的患病率很高,而已知糖尿病的患病率则低得多,这表明存在诊断不足的情况。结核病家庭接触者调查为提供多方面的干预措施提供了机会,以确定结核病感染和疾病、筛查非传染性疾病并解决共同的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of non‐communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of non‐communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis. We searched Medline, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from inception to 16 May 2023. We included studies that assessed for at least one non‐communicable disease among household contacts of people with clinical tuberculosis. We estimated the non‐communicable disease prevalence through mixed effects logistic regression for studies providing individual participant data, and compared it with estimates from aggregated data meta‐analyses. Furthermore, we compared age and sex‐standardised non‐communicable disease prevalence with national‐level estimates standardised for age and sex.ResultsWe identified 39 eligible studies, of which 14 provided individual participant data (29,194 contacts). Of the remaining 25 studies, 18 studies reported aggregated data suitable for aggregated data meta‐analysis. In individual participant data analysis, the pooled prevalence of diabetes in studies that undertook biochemical testing was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%–14.9%, four studies). Age‐and sex‐standardised prevalence was higher in two studies (10.4% vs. 6.9% and 11.5% vs. 8.4%) than the corresponding national estimates and similar in two studies. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus based on self‐report or medical records was 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%–4.6%, 14 studies). Prevalence did not significantly differ compared to estimates from aggregated data meta‐analysis. There were limited data for other non‐communicable diseases.ConclusionThe prevalence of diabetes mellitus among household contacts was high while that of known diabetes was substantially lower, suggesting the underdiagnosis. tuberculosis household contact investigation offers opportunities to deliver multifaceted interventions to identify tuberculosis infection and disease, screen for non‐communicable diseases and address shared risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for mortality in patients with chikungunya: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The cost of the production and release of male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes sterilised by irradiation. The neonatal mortality risk of vulnerable newborns in rural Bangladesh: A prospective cohort study within the Shonjibon trial. IgA nephropathy is associated with Opisthorchis felineus liver fluke infection: Retrospective 5-year analysis of human kidney samples. Knowledge of local snakes, first-aid and prevention of snakebites among community health workers and community members in rural Malawi: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1