评估仅使用制造商数据预测发电量的光伏电池板热建模

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.039
{"title":"评估仅使用制造商数据预测发电量的光伏电池板热建模","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents an assessment of thermal modeling for photovoltaic modules, focusing on power output prediction using manufacturer-provided data along with irradiance and weather-related variables. Several steady-state thermal models based on empirical correlations were evaluated for computing the temperature of the photovoltaic module. Additionally, a dynamic model was developed based on the energy conservation equation, incorporating the effects of wind speed and direction, using only manufacturer data and other parameters available in the literature. The performance of these models was evaluated against measured temperatures on the backsides of photovoltaic modules. The models were further integrated with the simple estimate with temperature correction and single diode and five-parameter electrical models to assess combined power output prediction performance. Results show that the Mattei steady-state model is the most accurate for temperature estimation, with a mean bias error of −0.4°C and a root mean squared error of 2.7°C. For power output estimation, the Kurtz (Sandia1) model combined with the simple estimate with temperature correction outperforms others, showing a mean bias error of 4.6 W and a root mean squared error of 54.5 W. This study systematically evaluates and compares the performance of thermal models for different photovoltaic systems, offering a framework for selecting appropriate models based on their accuracy in temperature estimation and power output prediction. These models can support operational photovoltaic forecasts without the need for production data and facilitate decision-making in the deployment and management of photovoltaic technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484724004645/pdfft?md5=d0b86d156eee4e42dc3c621416e41e4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352484724004645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of thermal modeling of photovoltaic panels for predicting power generation using only manufacturer data\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents an assessment of thermal modeling for photovoltaic modules, focusing on power output prediction using manufacturer-provided data along with irradiance and weather-related variables. Several steady-state thermal models based on empirical correlations were evaluated for computing the temperature of the photovoltaic module. Additionally, a dynamic model was developed based on the energy conservation equation, incorporating the effects of wind speed and direction, using only manufacturer data and other parameters available in the literature. The performance of these models was evaluated against measured temperatures on the backsides of photovoltaic modules. The models were further integrated with the simple estimate with temperature correction and single diode and five-parameter electrical models to assess combined power output prediction performance. Results show that the Mattei steady-state model is the most accurate for temperature estimation, with a mean bias error of −0.4°C and a root mean squared error of 2.7°C. For power output estimation, the Kurtz (Sandia1) model combined with the simple estimate with temperature correction outperforms others, showing a mean bias error of 4.6 W and a root mean squared error of 54.5 W. This study systematically evaluates and compares the performance of thermal models for different photovoltaic systems, offering a framework for selecting appropriate models based on their accuracy in temperature estimation and power output prediction. These models can support operational photovoltaic forecasts without the need for production data and facilitate decision-making in the deployment and management of photovoltaic technology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484724004645/pdfft?md5=d0b86d156eee4e42dc3c621416e41e4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352484724004645-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484724004645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484724004645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对光伏组件的热建模进行了评估,重点是利用制造商提供的数据以及辐照度和天气相关变量进行功率输出预测。评估了几个基于经验相关性的稳态热模型,用于计算光伏组件的温度。此外,还根据能量守恒方程开发了一个动态模型,其中包含风速和风向的影响,仅使用制造商提供的数据和文献中的其他参数。根据光伏组件背面的测量温度对这些模型的性能进行了评估。这些模型还进一步与带温度校正的简单估算、单二极管和五参数电气模型相结合,以评估综合功率输出预测性能。结果表明,Mattei 稳态模型的温度估计最准确,平均偏差误差为 -0.4°C,均方根误差为 2.7°C。在功率输出估算方面,库尔兹(桑迪亚1)模型结合温度校正的简单估算结果优于其他模型,平均偏差误差为 4.6 瓦,均方根误差为 54.5 瓦。这项研究系统地评估和比较了不同光伏系统热模型的性能,为根据温度估计和功率输出预测的准确性选择合适的模型提供了一个框架。这些模型无需生产数据即可支持光伏运行预测,并有助于光伏技术部署和管理方面的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of thermal modeling of photovoltaic panels for predicting power generation using only manufacturer data

This study presents an assessment of thermal modeling for photovoltaic modules, focusing on power output prediction using manufacturer-provided data along with irradiance and weather-related variables. Several steady-state thermal models based on empirical correlations were evaluated for computing the temperature of the photovoltaic module. Additionally, a dynamic model was developed based on the energy conservation equation, incorporating the effects of wind speed and direction, using only manufacturer data and other parameters available in the literature. The performance of these models was evaluated against measured temperatures on the backsides of photovoltaic modules. The models were further integrated with the simple estimate with temperature correction and single diode and five-parameter electrical models to assess combined power output prediction performance. Results show that the Mattei steady-state model is the most accurate for temperature estimation, with a mean bias error of −0.4°C and a root mean squared error of 2.7°C. For power output estimation, the Kurtz (Sandia1) model combined with the simple estimate with temperature correction outperforms others, showing a mean bias error of 4.6 W and a root mean squared error of 54.5 W. This study systematically evaluates and compares the performance of thermal models for different photovoltaic systems, offering a framework for selecting appropriate models based on their accuracy in temperature estimation and power output prediction. These models can support operational photovoltaic forecasts without the need for production data and facilitate decision-making in the deployment and management of photovoltaic technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing technological configurations in residential energy systems with vehicle-to-home integration and community-level power sharing Corrigendum to “Load forecasting method based on CNN and extended LSTM”, [Energy Rep., vol. 12, December 2024, Pages 2452–2461] Application of wavelet and seasonal-based emotional ANN (EANN) models to predict solar irradiance Corrigendum to “Design and implementation of an autonomous device with an app to monitor the performance of photovoltaic panels” [Energy Rep. 12 (2024) 2498–2510] Biogas generation from food waste through anaerobic digestion technology with emphasis on enhancing circular economy in Sub-Saharan Africa – A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1