减少磷肥施用量,降低土壤检测磷含量

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Use and Management Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1111/sum.13088
Kristin Steinfurth, Gunnar Börjesson, Pascal Denoroy, Bettina Eichler‐Löbermann, Wolfgang Gans, Johannes Heyn, Juliane Hirte, Florian Jansen, Dierk Koch, Ines Merbach, Alain Mollier, Christian Morel, Kerstin Panten, Edgar Peiter, Paul R. Poulton, Thomas Reitz, Gitte Holton Rubæk, Heide Spiegel, Michael van Laak, Sabine von Tucher, Uwe Buczko
{"title":"减少磷肥施用量,降低土壤检测磷含量","authors":"Kristin Steinfurth, Gunnar Börjesson, Pascal Denoroy, Bettina Eichler‐Löbermann, Wolfgang Gans, Johannes Heyn, Juliane Hirte, Florian Jansen, Dierk Koch, Ines Merbach, Alain Mollier, Christian Morel, Kerstin Panten, Edgar Peiter, Paul R. Poulton, Thomas Reitz, Gitte Holton Rubæk, Heide Spiegel, Michael van Laak, Sabine von Tucher, Uwe Buczko","doi":"10.1111/sum.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many European cropped soils have high soil test P (STP) values in the top soil because of P accumulation over many years of fertilizer application. This should allow to save P fertilizer applications for some years without STP values decreasing to a level that might negatively impact crop yield. However, the way STP develops under omitted P fertilizer application is not well understood. We examined STP development under omitted P fertilizer application for timeframes between 7 and 46 years on 96 unfertilized treatments (P0 treatments) of 43 European long‐term P field experiments, using five different STP methods. For comparability, values obtained by different STP methods were converted to Olsen‐P concentrations. We fitted exponential decay curves to Olsen‐P data of each P0 treatment defined by initial Olsen‐P values (<jats:italic>Olsen‐P</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>i</jats:italic></jats:sub>), rates of decrease (<jats:italic>k</jats:italic>) and asymptotes (<jats:italic>A</jats:italic>), reflecting minimum obtainable STP. Subsequently, we analysed whether the variables most commonly recorded in experiments, are sufficient to explain the variation in model parameters, these variables being P export, clay content, C<jats:sub>org</jats:sub> and pH as well as average annual temperature and precipitation. We found that out of our predictor variables, soil clay content, precipitation and temperature were showing the most prominent effects on the parameters <jats:italic>Olsen‐P</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>i</jats:italic></jats:sub>, <jats:italic>A</jats:italic> or <jats:italic>k</jats:italic>. However, the amount of variation explained by the considered variables was too low to potentially facilitate a prediction of STP decrease, and various P0 treatments showed no clear Olsen‐P decrease or unexpectedly high asymptotes. This hints at a strong influence of the P sorption capacity of the soil with often high potential for replenishment from less available P pools. In connection with P introduction from the subsoil or possibly from surrounding plots, the extension of timeframes of omitted P fertilizer application without reaching critical STP values for crop production, might be explainable. Corresponding effects could not be analysed because of lack of data for most P0 treatments, calling for the additional determination of, for example, the maximum P sorption capacity, total P and subsoil P in future experiments.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrease in soil test phosphorus levels under omitted phosphorus fertilizer application\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Steinfurth, Gunnar Börjesson, Pascal Denoroy, Bettina Eichler‐Löbermann, Wolfgang Gans, Johannes Heyn, Juliane Hirte, Florian Jansen, Dierk Koch, Ines Merbach, Alain Mollier, Christian Morel, Kerstin Panten, Edgar Peiter, Paul R. Poulton, Thomas Reitz, Gitte Holton Rubæk, Heide Spiegel, Michael van Laak, Sabine von Tucher, Uwe Buczko\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sum.13088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many European cropped soils have high soil test P (STP) values in the top soil because of P accumulation over many years of fertilizer application. This should allow to save P fertilizer applications for some years without STP values decreasing to a level that might negatively impact crop yield. However, the way STP develops under omitted P fertilizer application is not well understood. We examined STP development under omitted P fertilizer application for timeframes between 7 and 46 years on 96 unfertilized treatments (P0 treatments) of 43 European long‐term P field experiments, using five different STP methods. For comparability, values obtained by different STP methods were converted to Olsen‐P concentrations. We fitted exponential decay curves to Olsen‐P data of each P0 treatment defined by initial Olsen‐P values (<jats:italic>Olsen‐P</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>i</jats:italic></jats:sub>), rates of decrease (<jats:italic>k</jats:italic>) and asymptotes (<jats:italic>A</jats:italic>), reflecting minimum obtainable STP. Subsequently, we analysed whether the variables most commonly recorded in experiments, are sufficient to explain the variation in model parameters, these variables being P export, clay content, C<jats:sub>org</jats:sub> and pH as well as average annual temperature and precipitation. We found that out of our predictor variables, soil clay content, precipitation and temperature were showing the most prominent effects on the parameters <jats:italic>Olsen‐P</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>i</jats:italic></jats:sub>, <jats:italic>A</jats:italic> or <jats:italic>k</jats:italic>. However, the amount of variation explained by the considered variables was too low to potentially facilitate a prediction of STP decrease, and various P0 treatments showed no clear Olsen‐P decrease or unexpectedly high asymptotes. This hints at a strong influence of the P sorption capacity of the soil with often high potential for replenishment from less available P pools. In connection with P introduction from the subsoil or possibly from surrounding plots, the extension of timeframes of omitted P fertilizer application without reaching critical STP values for crop production, might be explainable. Corresponding effects could not be analysed because of lack of data for most P0 treatments, calling for the additional determination of, for example, the maximum P sorption capacity, total P and subsoil P in future experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于多年施用化肥,许多欧洲作物土壤表层的土壤测试磷(STP)值很高。这样就可以在某些年份节省施用磷肥,而不会使土壤中的 STP 值下降到可能对作物产量产生负面影响的水平。然而,人们对省略施用磷肥情况下 STP 的发展还不甚了解。我们采用五种不同的 STP 方法,对 43 个欧洲长期磷田试验中 96 个未施肥处理(P0 处理)的 7 至 46 年期间省略施用磷肥情况下的 STP 发展进行了研究。为便于比较,我们将不同 STP 方法得出的值转换为奥尔森磷浓度。我们对每种 P0 处理的 Olsen-P 数据拟合了指数衰减曲线,该曲线由初始 Olsen-P 值(Olsen-Pi)、下降率(k)和渐近线(A)定义,反映了可获得的最小 STP。随后,我们分析了实验中最常见的变量是否足以解释模型参数的变化,这些变量包括 P 出口、粘土含量、Corg 和 pH 值以及年平均气温和降水量。我们发现,在我们的预测变量中,土壤粘土含量、降水和温度对参数 Olsen-Pi、A 或 k 的影响最为显著。然而,所考虑的变量所解释的变化量太低,不足以预测 STP 的下降,而且各种 P0 处理没有显示出明显的 Olsen-P 下降或意外的高渐近线。这表明土壤对 P 的吸附能力有很大影响,而从可用的 P 池中补充 P 的潜力往往很大。如果从底土或周围地块引入钾元素,就可以解释为什么在未达到作物生产临界 STP 值的情况下,延长了省略施用钾肥的时间。由于缺乏大多数 P0 处理的数据,因此无法对相应的影响进行分析,这就需要在今后的实验中对最大 P 吸收能力、总 P 和底土 P 等进行额外测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decrease in soil test phosphorus levels under omitted phosphorus fertilizer application
Many European cropped soils have high soil test P (STP) values in the top soil because of P accumulation over many years of fertilizer application. This should allow to save P fertilizer applications for some years without STP values decreasing to a level that might negatively impact crop yield. However, the way STP develops under omitted P fertilizer application is not well understood. We examined STP development under omitted P fertilizer application for timeframes between 7 and 46 years on 96 unfertilized treatments (P0 treatments) of 43 European long‐term P field experiments, using five different STP methods. For comparability, values obtained by different STP methods were converted to Olsen‐P concentrations. We fitted exponential decay curves to Olsen‐P data of each P0 treatment defined by initial Olsen‐P values (Olsen‐Pi), rates of decrease (k) and asymptotes (A), reflecting minimum obtainable STP. Subsequently, we analysed whether the variables most commonly recorded in experiments, are sufficient to explain the variation in model parameters, these variables being P export, clay content, Corg and pH as well as average annual temperature and precipitation. We found that out of our predictor variables, soil clay content, precipitation and temperature were showing the most prominent effects on the parameters Olsen‐Pi, A or k. However, the amount of variation explained by the considered variables was too low to potentially facilitate a prediction of STP decrease, and various P0 treatments showed no clear Olsen‐P decrease or unexpectedly high asymptotes. This hints at a strong influence of the P sorption capacity of the soil with often high potential for replenishment from less available P pools. In connection with P introduction from the subsoil or possibly from surrounding plots, the extension of timeframes of omitted P fertilizer application without reaching critical STP values for crop production, might be explainable. Corresponding effects could not be analysed because of lack of data for most P0 treatments, calling for the additional determination of, for example, the maximum P sorption capacity, total P and subsoil P in future experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status Approaching soil health from a practitioner perspective – Placing practices before indicators for Australian cotton and other producers Soil carbon in the boreal region under climate and land use change Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil with Mg‐Fe‐Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) synthesized from waste red mud Effects of unbalanced fertilizer use on system productivity and profitability under rice‐based cropping systems: Evidence from Eastern Gangetic Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1