艾伦单抗治疗偏头痛的升级--双剂量无额外疗效--回顾性经验

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta neurologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z
Simon Heintz, Peter Storch, Philipp Burow, Patricia Maier, Mark Obermann, Grit Stoessel, Torsten Kraya, Steffen Naegel
{"title":"艾伦单抗治疗偏头痛的升级--双剂量无额外疗效--回顾性经验","authors":"Simon Heintz, Peter Storch, Philipp Burow, Patricia Maier, Mark Obermann, Grit Stoessel, Torsten Kraya, Steffen Naegel","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the CGRP-receptor. Several studies showed efficacy and safety in patients with migraine. Less is known regarding dosage increase, especially in a difficult to treat patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the increased dosage under real world conditions with particular focus on 70 mg non-responders.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In a retrospective analysis, patients treated in tertiary headache centers (Halle or Jena, Germany) receiving 70 mg erenumab for at least 3 months with a dosage increase to 140 mg were analyzed. Data were evaluated regarding headache days, intake of acute medication, previous prophylaxis, and medication overuse. Baseline and all treatment intervals were determined as three-month periods.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Datasets of 52 migraine patients (90.4% women) aged between 22 and 78 years (mean 50.4 years, SD 12.1 years) were analyzed. At baseline (mean headache-days 15.67 ± 6.37) 51.9% met criteria for chronic migraine and 56% were currently overusing acute medication. While therapy with 70 mg showed significant improvement in headache days and 50% response, further improvement was not achieved for therapy escalation to 140 mg. The same applies to the secondary endpoints and covers the entire study population as well as the subgroups of chronic and episodic migraine. The 50% response of the 70 mg non-responders for escalation was only 5.14%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In this difficult-to-treat patient cohort we reconfirmed the effectiveness of erenumab, but could not detect any additional benefit for a dosage escalation from 70 mg to 140 mg erenumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":"249 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erenumab escalation in migraine - double dose without additional benefit - a retrospective experience\",\"authors\":\"Simon Heintz, Peter Storch, Philipp Burow, Patricia Maier, Mark Obermann, Grit Stoessel, Torsten Kraya, Steffen Naegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the CGRP-receptor. Several studies showed efficacy and safety in patients with migraine. Less is known regarding dosage increase, especially in a difficult to treat patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the increased dosage under real world conditions with particular focus on 70 mg non-responders.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In a retrospective analysis, patients treated in tertiary headache centers (Halle or Jena, Germany) receiving 70 mg erenumab for at least 3 months with a dosage increase to 140 mg were analyzed. Data were evaluated regarding headache days, intake of acute medication, previous prophylaxis, and medication overuse. Baseline and all treatment intervals were determined as three-month periods.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Datasets of 52 migraine patients (90.4% women) aged between 22 and 78 years (mean 50.4 years, SD 12.1 years) were analyzed. At baseline (mean headache-days 15.67 ± 6.37) 51.9% met criteria for chronic migraine and 56% were currently overusing acute medication. While therapy with 70 mg showed significant improvement in headache days and 50% response, further improvement was not achieved for therapy escalation to 140 mg. The same applies to the secondary endpoints and covers the entire study population as well as the subgroups of chronic and episodic migraine. The 50% response of the 70 mg non-responders for escalation was only 5.14%.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>In this difficult-to-treat patient cohort we reconfirmed the effectiveness of erenumab, but could not detect any additional benefit for a dosage escalation from 70 mg to 140 mg erenumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 艾伦单抗是一种专门针对 CGRP 受体的单克隆抗体。多项研究显示,该药对偏头痛患者具有疗效和安全性。关于剂量的增加,尤其是对难以治疗的患者的剂量增加,目前所知较少。该研究的目的是评估在现实条件下增加剂量的情况,尤其关注 70 毫克无应答者。方法在一项回顾性分析中,分析了在三级头痛中心(德国哈勒或耶纳)接受 70 毫克艾伦单抗治疗至少 3 个月并将剂量增加至 140 毫克的患者。对头痛天数、急性药物摄入量、既往预防措施和药物过度使用等数据进行了评估。结果分析了 52 名偏头痛患者(90.4% 为女性)的数据集,这些患者的年龄在 22 岁至 78 岁之间(平均 50.4 岁,标准差 12.1 岁)。基线时(平均头痛天数为 15.67 ± 6.37),51.9% 的患者符合慢性偏头痛的标准,56% 的患者目前正在过度使用急性药物。虽然 70 毫克的治疗可显著改善头痛天数和 50%的反应,但治疗升级到 140 毫克后却没有进一步改善。这同样适用于次要终点,并涵盖整个研究人群以及慢性和发作性偏头痛亚组。结论在这个难以治疗的患者群中,我们再次证实了艾伦单抗的有效性,但未能发现将艾伦单抗的剂量从70毫克升级到140毫克会带来任何额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erenumab escalation in migraine - double dose without additional benefit - a retrospective experience

Background

Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the CGRP-receptor. Several studies showed efficacy and safety in patients with migraine. Less is known regarding dosage increase, especially in a difficult to treat patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the increased dosage under real world conditions with particular focus on 70 mg non-responders.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis, patients treated in tertiary headache centers (Halle or Jena, Germany) receiving 70 mg erenumab for at least 3 months with a dosage increase to 140 mg were analyzed. Data were evaluated regarding headache days, intake of acute medication, previous prophylaxis, and medication overuse. Baseline and all treatment intervals were determined as three-month periods.

Results

Datasets of 52 migraine patients (90.4% women) aged between 22 and 78 years (mean 50.4 years, SD 12.1 years) were analyzed. At baseline (mean headache-days 15.67 ± 6.37) 51.9% met criteria for chronic migraine and 56% were currently overusing acute medication. While therapy with 70 mg showed significant improvement in headache days and 50% response, further improvement was not achieved for therapy escalation to 140 mg. The same applies to the secondary endpoints and covers the entire study population as well as the subgroups of chronic and episodic migraine. The 50% response of the 70 mg non-responders for escalation was only 5.14%.

Conclusions

In this difficult-to-treat patient cohort we reconfirmed the effectiveness of erenumab, but could not detect any additional benefit for a dosage escalation from 70 mg to 140 mg erenumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
期刊最新文献
Expanding the phenotyping spectrum of Witteveen Kolk syndrome: first report of generalized dystonia and cerebellar ataxia. Risk of stroke after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease consortium. Two remarkable cases of haploinsufficiency found in the DYRK1A gene. Letter to the editor regarding "Postoperative elevated bed header position versus supine in the management of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Ibrahim Serag et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1