Fabian Acker , Alexandra Klein , Anna Rasokat , Anna Eisert , Anna Kron , Petros Christopoulos , Albrecht Stenzinger , Jonas Kulhavy , Horst-Dieter Hummel , Cornelius F. Waller , Anne Hummel , Achim Rittmeyer , Cornelia Kropf-Sanchen , Heiner Zimmermann , Alisa Lörsch , Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero , Maret Schütz , Franziska Herster , Franziska Thielert , Melanie Demes , Sebastian Michels
{"title":"对非小细胞肺癌患者进行 MET 和表皮生长因子受体联合抑制的多中心真实世界分析,以及表皮生长因子受体抑制后获得性 MET 扩增或多倍体的分析","authors":"Fabian Acker , Alexandra Klein , Anna Rasokat , Anna Eisert , Anna Kron , Petros Christopoulos , Albrecht Stenzinger , Jonas Kulhavy , Horst-Dieter Hummel , Cornelius F. Waller , Anne Hummel , Achim Rittmeyer , Cornelia Kropf-Sanchen , Heiner Zimmermann , Alisa Lörsch , Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero , Maret Schütz , Franziska Herster , Franziska Thielert , Melanie Demes , Sebastian Michels","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"25 8","pages":"Pages 672-682.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Combined MET and EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired MET Amplification or Polysomy After EGFR Inhibition\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Acker , Alexandra Klein , Anna Rasokat , Anna Eisert , Anna Kron , Petros Christopoulos , Albrecht Stenzinger , Jonas Kulhavy , Horst-Dieter Hummel , Cornelius F. Waller , Anne Hummel , Achim Rittmeyer , Cornelia Kropf-Sanchen , Heiner Zimmermann , Alisa Lörsch , Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero , Maret Schütz , Franziska Herster , Franziska Thielert , Melanie Demes , Sebastian Michels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 672-682.e5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,MET扩增是表皮生长因子受体抑制剂的常见耐药机制。一些试验显示,表皮生长因子受体和 MET 联合抑制(EGFRi/METi)取得了令人鼓舞的结果。然而,MET 扩增的定义并不一致,经常包括多倍体和真正的扩增。这是一项针对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制和MET拷贝数增殖(CNG)患者的多中心真实世界分析,MET拷贝数增殖定义为真正扩增(MET与7号染色体中心粒的比值[MET-CEP7]≥2)或多体(基因拷贝数≥5,MET-CEP7<2)。共纳入 43 例 MET CNG 患者,其中 42 例是通过 FISH 检测到的。分别有23人、7人和14人接受了EGFRi/METi、METi和SoC治疗。与METi(29%,4-71例)和SoC(50%,23-77例)相比,EGFRi/METi队列患者的实际临床获益率(定义为疾病稳定或更好)更高,达到82%(95%置信区间[CI],60-95)。EGFRi/METi的中位实际无进展生存期更长,METi为9.8个月,SoC为3.7个月(0.41,0.18-0.91),METi为4.3个月(危险比[HR],0.19,95% CI,0.06-0.57)。总生存期在数字上有所改善。与治疗方法和CNG类型(扩增与多倍体)的交互分析表明,只有接受EGFRi/METi治疗的MET扩增患者才会出现差异(OS的HR为0.09,0.01-0.54)。在这项真实世界研究中,EGFRi/METi比METi和SoC显示出临床获益。未来的研究应关注 MET CNG 类型的不同影响,重点关注真正的 MET 扩增作为预测反应的指标。然而,MET扩增一词的使用并不一致,而且经常包括多体。在这项回顾性研究中,与SoC相比,MET和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)联合抑制可使真正的MET扩增而非多核患者获得临床获益。
Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Combined MET and EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired MET Amplification or Polysomy After EGFR Inhibition
Purpose
MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification.
Methods
This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2).
Results
A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54).
Conclusion
In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.