合同代孕会破坏性别平等吗？

IF 1.7 2区哲学 Q2 ETHICS Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1111/bioe.13337

Jesse Hill

引用次数: 0

摘要

一些女权主义者认为，代孕合同应该是不可执行或非法的，因为它们助长并延续了不公正的性别不平等。我认为，在发达国家，代孕合同要么不会产生这些负面影响，要么可以通过监管来减轻这些影响。此外，从结果论的角度来看，存在一个规范的代孕市场是可取的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Does contract surrogacy undermine gender equality?

Some feminists hold that surrogacy contracts should be unenforceable or illegal because they contribute to and perpetuate unjust gender inequalities. I argue that in developed countries, surrogacy contracts either wouldn't have these negative effects or that these effects could be mitigated via regulation. Furthermore, the existence of a regulated surrogacy market is preferable on consequentialist grounds.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bioethics 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

9.10%

发文量

127

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.

期刊最新文献

Embryo selection, gene editing, and the person-affecting principle. Missing references and citations at Google Scholar. Ectogenesis and gender inequality: Two pathways converge. Confucian reflections on the new reproductive model of ROPA. Issue Information