以地理讨论--公众参与塑造公共空间的工具--为例,说明 PPGIS 工具的可用性

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Open Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1515/geo-2022-0668
Marek Młodkowski, Piotr Jankowski
{"title":"以地理讨论--公众参与塑造公共空间的工具--为例,说明 PPGIS 工具的可用性","authors":"Marek Młodkowski, Piotr Jankowski","doi":"10.1515/geo-2022-0668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the usability of the geodiscussion administrative panel, an online tool aiding Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. This tool was specifically designed and developed for distribution in a Software as a service model, offering geodiscussion users the flexibility to leverage the tool without the need for substantial investments in expensive infrastructure or complex deployments. The research primarily centers on the geodiscussion administrative panel, a key component empowering organizers of public consultations in spatial planning to efficiently create and manage consultation processes. In contrast to previous studies that focused on the usability for consultation participants, this research uniquely targets individuals responsible for organizing and overseeing the consultation processes. A diverse array of usability research methods were employed, ranging from the creation of personas and conducting direct interviews based on test scenarios to non-invasive methods for recording user activities. The study involved 682 participants who had prior experience with public consultations across various public administration units and representatives from consulting firms. Given that the usability studies were an integral part of the geodiscussion administrative panel’s development process, the research team has the opportunity to influence the further implementation of the applied functionalities. This implies that insights gained from the research can actively shape and enhance the tool’s features as it progresses in its development cycle.","PeriodicalId":48712,"journal":{"name":"Open Geosciences","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of PPGIS tools exemplified by geodiscussion – a tool for public participation in shaping public space\",\"authors\":\"Marek Młodkowski, Piotr Jankowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/geo-2022-0668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores the usability of the geodiscussion administrative panel, an online tool aiding Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. This tool was specifically designed and developed for distribution in a Software as a service model, offering geodiscussion users the flexibility to leverage the tool without the need for substantial investments in expensive infrastructure or complex deployments. The research primarily centers on the geodiscussion administrative panel, a key component empowering organizers of public consultations in spatial planning to efficiently create and manage consultation processes. In contrast to previous studies that focused on the usability for consultation participants, this research uniquely targets individuals responsible for organizing and overseeing the consultation processes. A diverse array of usability research methods were employed, ranging from the creation of personas and conducting direct interviews based on test scenarios to non-invasive methods for recording user activities. The study involved 682 participants who had prior experience with public consultations across various public administration units and representatives from consulting firms. Given that the usability studies were an integral part of the geodiscussion administrative panel’s development process, the research team has the opportunity to influence the further implementation of the applied functionalities. This implies that insights gained from the research can actively shape and enhance the tool’s features as it progresses in its development cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0668\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了地理讨论管理面板的可用性,这是一个帮助公众参与地理信息系统的在线工具。该工具是专门为软件即服务模式的分发而设计和开发的,为地理讨论用户提供了利用该工具的灵活性,而无需对昂贵的基础设施或复杂的部署进行大量投资。研究主要集中在地理讨论管理面板上,这是一个关键组件,可帮助空间规划中的公众咨询组织者有效创建和管理咨询流程。与以往侧重于咨询参与者可用性的研究不同,本研究将负责组织和监督咨询过程的人员作为独特的研究对象。研究采用了多种可用性研究方法,包括创建角色、根据测试场景进行直接访谈,以及记录用户活动的非侵入式方法。这项研究涉及 682 名参与者,他们都曾在不同的公共行政单位参与过公众咨询,并有来自咨询公司的代表。鉴于可用性研究是地理讨论行政小组开发过程中不可或缺的一部分,研究小组有机会影响应用功能的进一步实施。这意味着,从研究中获得的见解可以随着工具开发周期的推进,积极塑造和增强工具的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability of PPGIS tools exemplified by geodiscussion – a tool for public participation in shaping public space
The article explores the usability of the geodiscussion administrative panel, an online tool aiding Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. This tool was specifically designed and developed for distribution in a Software as a service model, offering geodiscussion users the flexibility to leverage the tool without the need for substantial investments in expensive infrastructure or complex deployments. The research primarily centers on the geodiscussion administrative panel, a key component empowering organizers of public consultations in spatial planning to efficiently create and manage consultation processes. In contrast to previous studies that focused on the usability for consultation participants, this research uniquely targets individuals responsible for organizing and overseeing the consultation processes. A diverse array of usability research methods were employed, ranging from the creation of personas and conducting direct interviews based on test scenarios to non-invasive methods for recording user activities. The study involved 682 participants who had prior experience with public consultations across various public administration units and representatives from consulting firms. Given that the usability studies were an integral part of the geodiscussion administrative panel’s development process, the research team has the opportunity to influence the further implementation of the applied functionalities. This implies that insights gained from the research can actively shape and enhance the tool’s features as it progresses in its development cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Geosciences
Open Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Geosciences (formerly Central European Journal of Geosciences - CEJG) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research results from all fields of Earth Sciences such as: Atmospheric Sciences, Geology, Geophysics, Geography, Oceanography and Hydrology, Glaciology, Speleology, Volcanology, Soil Science, Palaeoecology, Geotourism, Geoinformatics, Geostatistics.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of alteration in the geothermal province west of Cappadocia, Türkiye: Mineralogical, petrographical, geochemical, and remote sensing data Numerical modeling of site response at large strains with simplified nonlinear models: Application to Lotung seismic array Distribution law of Chang 7 Member tight oil in the western Ordos Basin based on geological, logging and numerical simulation techniques GIS-based spatial modeling of landslide susceptibility using BWM-LSI: A case study – city of Smederevo (Serbia) Structural detachment influences the shale gas preservation in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Northern Guizhou Province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1