语言质量、内容、结构:分析评分对德国和瑞士高中 EFL 写作技能的启示

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101129
Stefan D. Keller , Julian Lohmann , Ruth Trüb , Johanna Fleckenstein , Jennifer Meyer , Thorben Jansen , Jens Möller
{"title":"语言质量、内容、结构:分析评分对德国和瑞士高中 EFL 写作技能的启示","authors":"Stefan D. Keller ,&nbsp;Julian Lohmann ,&nbsp;Ruth Trüb ,&nbsp;Johanna Fleckenstein ,&nbsp;Jennifer Meyer ,&nbsp;Thorben Jansen ,&nbsp;Jens Möller","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Argumentative writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) is an important skill in upper secondary education in Germany and Switzerland. This article provides insights into students’ EFL writing skills in the aspects of <em>language quality</em>, <em>content</em>, and <em>structure</em> (N = 2314 TOEFL argumentative essays from two time-points, beginning and end of Year 11). These essays were analyzed by trained human raters using analytic assessment rubrics for each aspect and evaluated in a cross-sectional as well as a longitudinal perspective. Results show that there were significant variations between these aspects in learners’ texts, suggesting that they represent separate dimensions of the argumentative writing ability. Scores were lowest for language quality, suggesting that this was the most challenging aspect for EFL learners. Learning gains over one year were largest for structure, smaller for content and smallest for language quality. Overall, learners in Switzerland showed higher skills in all three aspects, but German learners showed larger gains in structure over the school year. Implications for classroom learning and further research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000365/pdfft?md5=6657adf63a2bb29bd0c8433d901a276a&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374324000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language quality, content, structure: What analytic ratings tell us about EFL writing skills at upper secondary school level in Germany and Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Stefan D. Keller ,&nbsp;Julian Lohmann ,&nbsp;Ruth Trüb ,&nbsp;Johanna Fleckenstein ,&nbsp;Jennifer Meyer ,&nbsp;Thorben Jansen ,&nbsp;Jens Möller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Argumentative writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) is an important skill in upper secondary education in Germany and Switzerland. This article provides insights into students’ EFL writing skills in the aspects of <em>language quality</em>, <em>content</em>, and <em>structure</em> (N = 2314 TOEFL argumentative essays from two time-points, beginning and end of Year 11). These essays were analyzed by trained human raters using analytic assessment rubrics for each aspect and evaluated in a cross-sectional as well as a longitudinal perspective. Results show that there were significant variations between these aspects in learners’ texts, suggesting that they represent separate dimensions of the argumentative writing ability. Scores were lowest for language quality, suggesting that this was the most challenging aspect for EFL learners. Learning gains over one year were largest for structure, smaller for content and smallest for language quality. Overall, learners in Switzerland showed higher skills in all three aspects, but German learners showed larger gains in structure over the school year. Implications for classroom learning and further research are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000365/pdfft?md5=6657adf63a2bb29bd0c8433d901a276a&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374324000365-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000365\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在德国和瑞士,英语作为外语(EFL)的议论文写作是高中教育中的一项重要技能。本文从 、 、 和 等方面深入分析了学生的 EFL 写作技能(N = 2314 篇托福议论文,分别来自 11 年级开始和结束两个时间点)。这些文章由训练有素的人工评分员使用各方面的分析评估标准进行分析,并从横向和纵向角度进行评估。结果表明,学习者的文章在这些方面存在明显差异,这表明它们代表了论证写作能力的不同维度。语言质量方面的得分最低,表明这是对英语学习者最具挑战性的方面。在一年的学习中,结构方面的学习收获最大,内容方面的学习收获较小,语言质量方面的学习收获最小。总体而言,瑞士的学习者在所有三个方面都表现出更高的技能,但德国学习者在一学年中在结构方面的进步更大。本文讨论了课堂学习和进一步研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language quality, content, structure: What analytic ratings tell us about EFL writing skills at upper secondary school level in Germany and Switzerland

Argumentative writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) is an important skill in upper secondary education in Germany and Switzerland. This article provides insights into students’ EFL writing skills in the aspects of language quality, content, and structure (N = 2314 TOEFL argumentative essays from two time-points, beginning and end of Year 11). These essays were analyzed by trained human raters using analytic assessment rubrics for each aspect and evaluated in a cross-sectional as well as a longitudinal perspective. Results show that there were significant variations between these aspects in learners’ texts, suggesting that they represent separate dimensions of the argumentative writing ability. Scores were lowest for language quality, suggesting that this was the most challenging aspect for EFL learners. Learning gains over one year were largest for structure, smaller for content and smallest for language quality. Overall, learners in Switzerland showed higher skills in all three aspects, but German learners showed larger gains in structure over the school year. Implications for classroom learning and further research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1