Erin M. Gawel , Katelin R. Keenehan , Deepthi S. Akella , Michele M. Carr
{"title":"腺扁桃体切除术中与抽吸电烧装置相关的不良事件:MAUDE 数据库分析。","authors":"Erin M. Gawel , Katelin R. Keenehan , Deepthi S. Akella , Michele M. Carr","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms “suction cautery,” “suction electrocautery,” “suction Bovie,” and “suction coagulator” from January 2014 to December 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (<em>N</em> = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (<em>N</em> = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (<em>N</em> = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (<em>N</em> = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (<em>N</em> = 7, 19.4 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 5","pages":"Article 104404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events related to suction electrocautery devices in adenotonsillectomy: Analysis of the MAUDE database\",\"authors\":\"Erin M. Gawel , Katelin R. Keenehan , Deepthi S. Akella , Michele M. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms “suction cautery,” “suction electrocautery,” “suction Bovie,” and “suction coagulator” from January 2014 to December 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (<em>N</em> = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (<em>N</em> = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (<em>N</em> = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (<em>N</em> = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (<em>N</em> = 7, 19.4 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400190X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400190X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adverse events related to suction electrocautery devices in adenotonsillectomy: Analysis of the MAUDE database
Objective
To identify adverse events (AEs) related to suction electrocautery use during adenotonsillectomy.
Methods
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched using the terms “suction cautery,” “suction electrocautery,” “suction Bovie,” and “suction coagulator” from January 2014 to December 2023.
Results
165 AE reports were gathered from the MAUDE database medical device reports (MDRs). 36 met inclusion criteria. Patient injuries were found in 22 (61.1 %) reports and device malfunction events were found in 14 (38.9 %) reports. All patient injuries were thermal burns (N = 22, 100 %). Location of burn injuries included the lip (N = 6, 27.3 %), oral commissure (N = 5, 22.7 %), and tongue (N = 4, 18.2 %). The most common cause of an AE was inadequate device insulation (N = 7, 19.4 %).
Conclusion
The suction electrocautery apparatus may malfunction and cause patient burn injuries. Device failures mainly result from inadequate device insulation, coagulation problems, and detachment of device components. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications and counsel parents and patients regarding AEs.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.