沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生学术作弊的原因:一项横断面研究。

Q3 Medicine Journal of Medicine and Life Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.25122/jml-2023-0517
Jazi Shaydied Alotaibi, Abdullah Alotaibi, Sharifa Alasiry, Bader Alrasheadi, Wdad Alanazy, Sameer Alkubati, Jordan Llego
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生学术作弊的原因:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Jazi Shaydied Alotaibi, Abdullah Alotaibi, Sharifa Alasiry, Bader Alrasheadi, Wdad Alanazy, Sameer Alkubati, Jordan Llego","doi":"10.25122/jml-2023-0517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study investigated the reasons behind academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The study involved 482 nursing students from two government universities in Riyadh. We used a newly developed self-reported questionnaire called the Reasons for Cheating Scale (RCS) to collect data. The highest-scoring reasons for academic cheating in the study population included the desire to obtain high grades, encouragement from friends to cheat, and the perception that exams were too difficult. Male students scored significantly higher than female students for reasons such as not understanding the course material, unclear test questions and instructions, pressure from families to excel, difficulty of the course material, and ignorance of effective study methods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Age also had a role, as students aged 15-20 years had significantly higher scores for the item \"Exams are too hard\", whereas those aged ≥25 years had higher scores for \"Difficulty of the course material\" (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, students in the preparatory year had significantly higher scores than those in other years for reasons such as difficult exams, unclear test questions and instructions, fear of failing, difficulty of the course material, and the desire to please their families (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Overall, the desire to obtain high grades emerged as the main reason for academic cheating in our cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest that sociodemographic characteristics, including sex, age, and academic year, should be considered when addressing the issue of cheating among nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 4","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasons for academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Jazi Shaydied Alotaibi, Abdullah Alotaibi, Sharifa Alasiry, Bader Alrasheadi, Wdad Alanazy, Sameer Alkubati, Jordan Llego\",\"doi\":\"10.25122/jml-2023-0517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study investigated the reasons behind academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The study involved 482 nursing students from two government universities in Riyadh. We used a newly developed self-reported questionnaire called the Reasons for Cheating Scale (RCS) to collect data. The highest-scoring reasons for academic cheating in the study population included the desire to obtain high grades, encouragement from friends to cheat, and the perception that exams were too difficult. Male students scored significantly higher than female students for reasons such as not understanding the course material, unclear test questions and instructions, pressure from families to excel, difficulty of the course material, and ignorance of effective study methods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Age also had a role, as students aged 15-20 years had significantly higher scores for the item \\\"Exams are too hard\\\", whereas those aged ≥25 years had higher scores for \\\"Difficulty of the course material\\\" (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, students in the preparatory year had significantly higher scores than those in other years for reasons such as difficult exams, unclear test questions and instructions, fear of failing, difficulty of the course material, and the desire to please their families (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Overall, the desire to obtain high grades emerged as the main reason for academic cheating in our cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest that sociodemographic characteristics, including sex, age, and academic year, should be considered when addressing the issue of cheating among nursing students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"418-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面研究调查了沙特阿拉伯一批护理专业学生学术作弊的原因。研究涉及利雅得两所公立大学的 482 名护理专业学生。我们使用了一份新开发的自我报告问卷,即 "作弊原因量表"(RCS)来收集数据。研究对象中得分最高的学术作弊原因包括渴望获得高分、朋友鼓励作弊以及认为考试太难。男生在不理解课程材料、试题和说明不明确、家庭要求学生取得优异成绩的压力、课程材料的难度以及不了解有效的学习方法等原因上的得分明显高于女生(P < 0.05)。年龄也有影响,15-20 岁的学生在 "考试太难 "一项上的得分明显更高,而年龄≥25 岁的学生在 "教材难度 "一项上的得分更高(P < 0.05)。此外,预科年级学生在 "考试难"、"试题和说明不清楚"、"害怕不及格"、"教材难 "和 "想取悦家人 "等方面的得分明显高于其他年级学生(P < 0.05)。总体而言,希望获得高分是沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生学术作弊的主要原因。研究结果表明,在解决护理专业学生的作弊问题时,应考虑社会人口学特征,包括性别、年龄和学年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reasons for academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.

This cross-sectional study investigated the reasons behind academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The study involved 482 nursing students from two government universities in Riyadh. We used a newly developed self-reported questionnaire called the Reasons for Cheating Scale (RCS) to collect data. The highest-scoring reasons for academic cheating in the study population included the desire to obtain high grades, encouragement from friends to cheat, and the perception that exams were too difficult. Male students scored significantly higher than female students for reasons such as not understanding the course material, unclear test questions and instructions, pressure from families to excel, difficulty of the course material, and ignorance of effective study methods (P < 0.05). Age also had a role, as students aged 15-20 years had significantly higher scores for the item "Exams are too hard", whereas those aged ≥25 years had higher scores for "Difficulty of the course material" (P < 0.05). Additionally, students in the preparatory year had significantly higher scores than those in other years for reasons such as difficult exams, unclear test questions and instructions, fear of failing, difficulty of the course material, and the desire to please their families (P < 0.05). Overall, the desire to obtain high grades emerged as the main reason for academic cheating in our cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest that sociodemographic characteristics, including sex, age, and academic year, should be considered when addressing the issue of cheating among nursing students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
期刊最新文献
Akkermansia muciniphila in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A homozygous nonsense mutation identified in COL7A1 in a family with autosomal recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Associations between ocular biometry and anthropometric measurements among Sudanese adults. Complications and benefits of enteral feeding in children with progressive neurological disease in a palliative care service: a retrospective study. Investigating the association between resilience and impostor syndrome in undergraduate nursing and medical students: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1