青少年在坚持服用控制药物、治疗障碍和哮喘控制方面的差异。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27192
Rachel Sweenie, Lori E Crosby, Theresa W Guilbert, Jill M Plevinsky, Amy E Noser, Rachelle R Ramsey
{"title":"青少年在坚持服用控制药物、治疗障碍和哮喘控制方面的差异。","authors":"Rachel Sweenie, Lori E Crosby, Theresa W Guilbert, Jill M Plevinsky, Amy E Noser, Rachelle R Ramsey","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in asthma persist despite advances in interventions. Adherence and self-management behaviors are critical yet challenging during adolescence. Treatment barriers include individual factors as well as structural and social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine differences in controller medication adherence, asthma control, and treatment barriers by race, income, and insurance and whether racial disparities persist when controlling for income and insurance. Associations between adherence, barriers, and control were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents completed measures of treatment barriers and asthma control. Controller medication adherence was measured electronically. Descriptive statistics, means comparisons, and analyses of covariance were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-five adolescents participated (M<sub>age</sub> = 14.55, SD = 2.01, 37.6% Black or African American, 55.2% White). Black or African American adolescents had significantly lower adherence than White adolescents, t(105) = 2.79, p = .006, Cohen's d = .55. This difference was not significant when controlling for income and insurance (p > .05). There was a significant difference in asthma control, F(1,86) = 4.07, p = .047, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup> = .045, where Black or African American adolescents had better asthma control scores than White adolescents. Feeling tired of living with asthma was the most common barrier among all adolescents (62.4%). More Black or African American adolescents endorsed difficulty getting to the pharmacy than White adolescents, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 116) = 4.86, p = .027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial disparities in asthma may be partially driven by income, insurance, and pharmacy access. Asthma burnout may be important to address for all adolescents with asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"3288-3297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in adolescent controller medication adherence, treatment barriers, and asthma control.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Sweenie, Lori E Crosby, Theresa W Guilbert, Jill M Plevinsky, Amy E Noser, Rachelle R Ramsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in asthma persist despite advances in interventions. Adherence and self-management behaviors are critical yet challenging during adolescence. Treatment barriers include individual factors as well as structural and social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine differences in controller medication adherence, asthma control, and treatment barriers by race, income, and insurance and whether racial disparities persist when controlling for income and insurance. Associations between adherence, barriers, and control were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents completed measures of treatment barriers and asthma control. Controller medication adherence was measured electronically. Descriptive statistics, means comparisons, and analyses of covariance were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-five adolescents participated (M<sub>age</sub> = 14.55, SD = 2.01, 37.6% Black or African American, 55.2% White). Black or African American adolescents had significantly lower adherence than White adolescents, t(105) = 2.79, p = .006, Cohen's d = .55. This difference was not significant when controlling for income and insurance (p > .05). There was a significant difference in asthma control, F(1,86) = 4.07, p = .047, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup> = .045, where Black or African American adolescents had better asthma control scores than White adolescents. Feeling tired of living with asthma was the most common barrier among all adolescents (62.4%). More Black or African American adolescents endorsed difficulty getting to the pharmacy than White adolescents, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 116) = 4.86, p = .027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial disparities in asthma may be partially driven by income, insurance, and pharmacy access. Asthma burnout may be important to address for all adolescents with asthma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3288-3297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管干预措施取得了进展,但哮喘的不平等现象依然存在。在青少年时期,坚持治疗和自我管理行为至关重要,但也极具挑战性。治疗障碍包括个人因素以及健康的结构和社会决定因素:目的:确定不同种族、收入和保险在坚持服用控制药物、哮喘控制和治疗障碍方面的差异,以及在控制收入和保险后是否仍存在种族差异。此外,还研究了坚持治疗、障碍和控制之间的关联:青少年完成了治疗障碍和哮喘控制的测量。对控制药物的依从性进行了电子测量。研究采用了描述性统计、均值比较和协方差分析等方法:125名青少年参与了研究(年龄=14.55,SD=2.01,37.6%为黑人或非裔美国人,55.2%为白人)。黑人或非裔美国青少年的坚持率明显低于白人青少年,t(105) = 2.79, p = .006, Cohen's d = .55。如果考虑到收入和保险因素,这一差异并不明显(p > .05)。在哮喘控制方面,黑人或非裔美国青少年的哮喘控制得分高于白人青少年,差异明显,F(1,86) = 4.07, p = .047, ηp 2 = .045。对哮喘病感到厌倦是所有青少年中最常见的障碍(62.4%)。与白人青少年相比,更多黑人或非裔美国青少年表示去药店买药有困难,X2 (1, N = 116) = 4.86, p = .027:哮喘的种族差异可能部分是由收入、保险和药房使用权造成的。对于所有患有哮喘的青少年来说,解决哮喘倦怠问题可能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in adolescent controller medication adherence, treatment barriers, and asthma control.

Background: Disparities in asthma persist despite advances in interventions. Adherence and self-management behaviors are critical yet challenging during adolescence. Treatment barriers include individual factors as well as structural and social determinants of health.

Objective: To determine differences in controller medication adherence, asthma control, and treatment barriers by race, income, and insurance and whether racial disparities persist when controlling for income and insurance. Associations between adherence, barriers, and control were also examined.

Methods: Adolescents completed measures of treatment barriers and asthma control. Controller medication adherence was measured electronically. Descriptive statistics, means comparisons, and analyses of covariance were conducted.

Results: One hundred twenty-five adolescents participated (Mage = 14.55, SD = 2.01, 37.6% Black or African American, 55.2% White). Black or African American adolescents had significantly lower adherence than White adolescents, t(105) = 2.79, p = .006, Cohen's d = .55. This difference was not significant when controlling for income and insurance (p > .05). There was a significant difference in asthma control, F(1,86) = 4.07, p = .047, ηp 2 = .045, where Black or African American adolescents had better asthma control scores than White adolescents. Feeling tired of living with asthma was the most common barrier among all adolescents (62.4%). More Black or African American adolescents endorsed difficulty getting to the pharmacy than White adolescents, X2 (1, N = 116) = 4.86, p = .027.

Conclusions: Racial disparities in asthma may be partially driven by income, insurance, and pharmacy access. Asthma burnout may be important to address for all adolescents with asthma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
期刊最新文献
Upcoming events of interest. Is it time to end race and ethnicity adjustment for pediatric pulmonary function tests? Disparities in prevalence and outcomes of respiratory disease in low- and middle-income countries. Disparities and therapeutic advances in cystic fibrosis. The influence of disparities on intensive care outcomes in children with respiratory diseases: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1