药品中的 N-亚硝胺杂质风险评估:利用体内突变相对效力比较法确定NTTP的可接受摄入量。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105681
Mark W. Powley , Zhanna Sobol , George E. Johnson , Robert W. Clark , Stephen M. Dalby , Bridget A. Ykoruk , Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic , Mark D. Mowery , Patricia A. Escobar
{"title":"药品中的 N-亚硝胺杂质风险评估:利用体内突变相对效力比较法确定NTTP的可接受摄入量。","authors":"Mark W. Powley ,&nbsp;Zhanna Sobol ,&nbsp;George E. Johnson ,&nbsp;Robert W. Clark ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Dalby ,&nbsp;Bridget A. Ykoruk ,&nbsp;Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic ,&nbsp;Mark D. Mowery ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Escobar","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The finding of <em>N</em>-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and <em>N</em>-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on <em>N</em>-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines with model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for <em>N</em>-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 105681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N-nitrosamine impurity risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Utilizing In vivo mutation relative potency comparison to establish an acceptable intake for NTTP\",\"authors\":\"Mark W. Powley ,&nbsp;Zhanna Sobol ,&nbsp;George E. Johnson ,&nbsp;Robert W. Clark ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Dalby ,&nbsp;Bridget A. Ykoruk ,&nbsp;Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic ,&nbsp;Mark D. Mowery ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Escobar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The finding of <em>N</em>-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and <em>N</em>-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on <em>N</em>-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines with model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for <em>N</em>-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在市场上销售的药物中发现 N-亚硝基二乙胺 (NDEA) 和 N-亚硝基二甲胺 (NDMA) 后,实施了风险评估程序,旨在限制对整个亚硝胺类物质的接触。风险评估过程的一个重要组成部分是确定保护人类健康的暴露限值。确定新型 N-亚硝胺接触限值的一种方法是进行体内转基因啮齿动物 (TGR) 变异研究。现有的亚硝胺监管指南提供的决策标准是将体内转基因啮齿动物突变研究解释为总体阳性或阴性。不过,基准剂量 (BMD) 等出发点指标可用于定义效价,并为确定相关暴露限值提供机会。这可以通过将新型 N-亚硝胺与拥有可靠体内诱变性和致癌性数据的模型 N-亚硝胺进行相对效力比较来实现。目前的研究工作提供了 N-亚硝基哌啶 (NPIP) 的体内 TGR 突变数据,从而增加了模型 N-亚硝胺的数据集。此外,还为在含有西他列汀的产品中发现的一种新型 N-亚硝胺杂质 7-亚硝基-3-(三氟甲基)-5,6,7,8-四氢-[1,2,4]三唑并[4,3-a]吡嗪(NTTP)生成了体内 TGR 突变数据。利用相对效力比较法,我们证明了每天接触 1500 纳克或以上水平的 NTTP 是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
N-nitrosamine impurity risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Utilizing In vivo mutation relative potency comparison to establish an acceptable intake for NTTP

The finding of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of N-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel N-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on N-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel N-nitrosamines with model N-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model N-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel N-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Considerations and derivations of permitted daily exposure limits for impurities from intravitreal pharmaceutical products. Carcinogenicity Assessment of Inotersen in Tg.rasH2 Mice and Sprague-Dawley Rats: Implications for 2'-MOE Antisense Oligonucleotides. Enhancing reliability of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies: A proposed design of replicate studies. Target organ toxicity in Sprague Dawley rats following oral exposure to complex groundwater mixture: Assessment of dose-response relationships using histopathological and biochemical alterations Minimizing the Risk of Ethylene Glycol and Diethylene Glycol Poisoning in Medications: A Regulatory and Pharmacopoeial Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1