Mark W. Powley , Zhanna Sobol , George E. Johnson , Robert W. Clark , Stephen M. Dalby , Bridget A. Ykoruk , Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic , Mark D. Mowery , Patricia A. Escobar
{"title":"药品中的 N-亚硝胺杂质风险评估:利用体内突变相对效力比较法确定NTTP的可接受摄入量。","authors":"Mark W. Powley , Zhanna Sobol , George E. Johnson , Robert W. Clark , Stephen M. Dalby , Bridget A. Ykoruk , Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic , Mark D. Mowery , Patricia A. Escobar","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The finding of <em>N</em>-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and <em>N</em>-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on <em>N</em>-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines with model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for <em>N</em>-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 105681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N-nitrosamine impurity risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Utilizing In vivo mutation relative potency comparison to establish an acceptable intake for NTTP\",\"authors\":\"Mark W. Powley , Zhanna Sobol , George E. Johnson , Robert W. Clark , Stephen M. Dalby , Bridget A. Ykoruk , Alema Galijatovic-Idrizbegovic , Mark D. Mowery , Patricia A. Escobar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The finding of <em>N</em>-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and <em>N</em>-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on <em>N</em>-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamines with model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model <em>N</em>-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for <em>N</em>-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel <em>N</em>-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
N-nitrosamine impurity risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Utilizing In vivo mutation relative potency comparison to establish an acceptable intake for NTTP
The finding of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of N-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel N-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on N-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel N-nitrosamines with model N-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model N-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel N-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)