Siobhan Manners MD, William Morgan FRANZCO, Nigel Morlet FRANZCO, Lynn Meuleners PhD, Wei Liu PhD, Hector Morlet, Jonathon Q. Ng FRANZCO
{"title":"视力障碍流行病学 (eFOVID) 研究,西澳大利亚州,1988-2022 年。报告 1:数据收集和汇总协议。","authors":"Siobhan Manners MD, William Morgan FRANZCO, Nigel Morlet FRANZCO, Lynn Meuleners PhD, Wei Liu PhD, Hector Morlet, Jonathon Q. Ng FRANZCO","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Computerised static visual field testing using dedicated machines such as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) can assess and track changes in visual field sensitivity. The use of retrospective visual field databases is a novel undertaking, with no studies published utilising large scale population-level data. This study phase developed a method to extract HFA data into a large standardised population-based database including point sensitivity data with additional derived variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective, longitudinal, population study of visual field data from people who attended an ophthalmology service and had a HFA field test, in Western Australia, between 1988 and 2022. Raw test data included patient demographic fields, sensitivity readings and test parameters. Calculated fields included reliability scores, and a novel combined reliability score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 606 230 tests for 92 215 study individuals, from 22 ophthalmology practices in metropolitan Perth and three public hospital eye clinics, representing around 85% of the field tests performed by ophthalmologists each year. Raw sensitivity values were available for all tests, and additional descriptors were available for most tests (97.5%–100% of tests) with the exception of data variables retired by the manufacturer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Visual field data from 606 230 tests were collated into a single dataset, which is highly representative over a long period of time, for a defined population. This dataset has been linked to other administrative datasets to allow for epidemiological investigation of field of vision disorders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"52 8","pages":"819-832"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14422","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of Field of Vision Disorders (eFOVID) study, Western Australia, 1988–2022. Report 1: Data collection and aggregation protocol\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan Manners MD, William Morgan FRANZCO, Nigel Morlet FRANZCO, Lynn Meuleners PhD, Wei Liu PhD, Hector Morlet, Jonathon Q. Ng FRANZCO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Computerised static visual field testing using dedicated machines such as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) can assess and track changes in visual field sensitivity. The use of retrospective visual field databases is a novel undertaking, with no studies published utilising large scale population-level data. This study phase developed a method to extract HFA data into a large standardised population-based database including point sensitivity data with additional derived variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective, longitudinal, population study of visual field data from people who attended an ophthalmology service and had a HFA field test, in Western Australia, between 1988 and 2022. Raw test data included patient demographic fields, sensitivity readings and test parameters. Calculated fields included reliability scores, and a novel combined reliability score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 606 230 tests for 92 215 study individuals, from 22 ophthalmology practices in metropolitan Perth and three public hospital eye clinics, representing around 85% of the field tests performed by ophthalmologists each year. Raw sensitivity values were available for all tests, and additional descriptors were available for most tests (97.5%–100% of tests) with the exception of data variables retired by the manufacturer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Visual field data from 606 230 tests were collated into a single dataset, which is highly representative over a long period of time, for a defined population. This dataset has been linked to other administrative datasets to allow for epidemiological investigation of field of vision disorders.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"819-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14422\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14422\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epidemiology of Field of Vision Disorders (eFOVID) study, Western Australia, 1988–2022. Report 1: Data collection and aggregation protocol
Background
Computerised static visual field testing using dedicated machines such as the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) can assess and track changes in visual field sensitivity. The use of retrospective visual field databases is a novel undertaking, with no studies published utilising large scale population-level data. This study phase developed a method to extract HFA data into a large standardised population-based database including point sensitivity data with additional derived variables.
Methods
Retrospective, longitudinal, population study of visual field data from people who attended an ophthalmology service and had a HFA field test, in Western Australia, between 1988 and 2022. Raw test data included patient demographic fields, sensitivity readings and test parameters. Calculated fields included reliability scores, and a novel combined reliability score.
Results
There were 606 230 tests for 92 215 study individuals, from 22 ophthalmology practices in metropolitan Perth and three public hospital eye clinics, representing around 85% of the field tests performed by ophthalmologists each year. Raw sensitivity values were available for all tests, and additional descriptors were available for most tests (97.5%–100% of tests) with the exception of data variables retired by the manufacturer.
Conclusions
Visual field data from 606 230 tests were collated into a single dataset, which is highly representative over a long period of time, for a defined population. This dataset has been linked to other administrative datasets to allow for epidemiological investigation of field of vision disorders.
期刊介绍:
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.