患有阿片类药物使用障碍的被监禁妇女的社会支持网络:与监狱药物使用治疗相关的差异。

{"title":"患有阿片类药物使用障碍的被监禁妇女的社会支持网络:与监狱药物使用治疗相关的差异。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Social support is a critical factor for women's engagement with substance use treatment and recovery, particularly for women with criminal-legal system involvement. However, less is known about the social support networks of incarcerated women, particularly as a function of service engagement. Thus, this paper aims to describe the structure, composition, and function of social support networks of women with opioid use disorder (OUD) incarcerated in jails; and compare network differences between women receiving jail-based substance use treatment and non-treatment participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>As part of a larger clinical trial under the NIDA-funded Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN), staff conducted an egocentric social network inventory with women who were randomly selected from eight jails in Kentucky, screened for OUD, and consented (<em>N</em> = 445). Women were asked to name people (alters) who provided them with support in the past 90 days and respond to questions about alters who were named. Bivariate comparisons examined differences in social networks among women who were currently receiving jail-based treatment (29.9 %, <em>n</em> = 133) and those who were incarcerated, but not receiving treatment (70.1 %, <em>n</em> = 312).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, women's social support networks consisted of 2.4 alters (range 1–9). Compared to women with OUD who were not receiving treatment, those in treatment were significantly more likely to name at least one alter who was in recovery (57.9 % vs. 43.9 %, <em>p</em> = .007) and less likely to name a partner (21.8 % vs. 37.8 %, <em>p</em> = .001) or someone who had recently used opioids (9.8 % vs. 24.7 %, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). On average, women in treatment also felt significantly closer to their alters (4.70 vs. 4.55 out of 5, <em>p</em> = .021) and rated alters as fulfilling more types of social support functions (5.54 vs. 5.18 out of 6, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and recovery support functions (2.83 vs. 2.70 out of 3, <em>p</em> = .016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results suggest that women participating in jail-based substance use treatment reported more positive social support network attributes, including network function and composition. Future research should assess longitudinal changes in networks and associated differences in recovery outcomes as women are released to the community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social support networks of incarcerated women with opioid use disorder: Differences associated with jail-based substance use treatment\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Social support is a critical factor for women's engagement with substance use treatment and recovery, particularly for women with criminal-legal system involvement. However, less is known about the social support networks of incarcerated women, particularly as a function of service engagement. Thus, this paper aims to describe the structure, composition, and function of social support networks of women with opioid use disorder (OUD) incarcerated in jails; and compare network differences between women receiving jail-based substance use treatment and non-treatment participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>As part of a larger clinical trial under the NIDA-funded Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN), staff conducted an egocentric social network inventory with women who were randomly selected from eight jails in Kentucky, screened for OUD, and consented (<em>N</em> = 445). Women were asked to name people (alters) who provided them with support in the past 90 days and respond to questions about alters who were named. Bivariate comparisons examined differences in social networks among women who were currently receiving jail-based treatment (29.9 %, <em>n</em> = 133) and those who were incarcerated, but not receiving treatment (70.1 %, <em>n</em> = 312).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, women's social support networks consisted of 2.4 alters (range 1–9). Compared to women with OUD who were not receiving treatment, those in treatment were significantly more likely to name at least one alter who was in recovery (57.9 % vs. 43.9 %, <em>p</em> = .007) and less likely to name a partner (21.8 % vs. 37.8 %, <em>p</em> = .001) or someone who had recently used opioids (9.8 % vs. 24.7 %, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). On average, women in treatment also felt significantly closer to their alters (4.70 vs. 4.55 out of 5, <em>p</em> = .021) and rated alters as fulfilling more types of social support functions (5.54 vs. 5.18 out of 6, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and recovery support functions (2.83 vs. 2.70 out of 3, <em>p</em> = .016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results suggest that women participating in jail-based substance use treatment reported more positive social support network attributes, including network function and composition. Future research should assess longitudinal changes in networks and associated differences in recovery outcomes as women are released to the community.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:社会支持是女性参与药物使用治疗和康复的关键因素,尤其是对于涉及刑事法律系统的女性而言。然而,人们对被监禁妇女的社会支持网络知之甚少,特别是作为参与服务的功能。因此,本文旨在描述被监禁在监狱中的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)女性的社会支持网络的结构、组成和功能;并比较接受监狱药物使用治疗的女性与未接受治疗的女性之间的网络差异:作为由美国国家药品管理局(NIDA)资助的司法社区阿片类药物创新网络(JCOIN)大型临床试验的一部分,工作人员对从肯塔基州八所监狱中随机抽取、筛查出患有 OUD 并同意接受治疗的女性(N = 445)进行了以自我为中心的社交网络调查。妇女们被要求说出在过去 90 天内为她们提供支持的人(分身)的名字,并回答有关被点名的分身的问题。双变量比较研究了目前正在接受监狱治疗的女性(29.9%,n = 133)与那些被监禁但未接受治疗的女性(70.1%,n = 312)在社交网络方面的差异:妇女的社会支持网络平均由 2.4 个替代者组成(1-9 个不等)。与未接受治疗的 OUD 妇女相比,接受治疗的妇女更有可能说出至少一名正在康复中的替代者(57.9% vs. 43.9%,p = .007),而说出伴侣(21.8% vs. 37.8%,p = .001)或最近使用过阿片类药物的人的可能性较小(9.8% vs. 24.7%,p 结论:结果表明,接受治疗的妇女更有可能说出至少一名正在康复中的替代者(57.9% vs. 43.9%,p = .007):结果表明,参与监狱药物使用治疗的女性报告了更多积极的社会支持网络属性,包括网络功能和组成。未来的研究应评估网络的纵向变化以及女性被释放到社区后康复结果的相关差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social support networks of incarcerated women with opioid use disorder: Differences associated with jail-based substance use treatment

Introduction

Social support is a critical factor for women's engagement with substance use treatment and recovery, particularly for women with criminal-legal system involvement. However, less is known about the social support networks of incarcerated women, particularly as a function of service engagement. Thus, this paper aims to describe the structure, composition, and function of social support networks of women with opioid use disorder (OUD) incarcerated in jails; and compare network differences between women receiving jail-based substance use treatment and non-treatment participants.

Methods

As part of a larger clinical trial under the NIDA-funded Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN), staff conducted an egocentric social network inventory with women who were randomly selected from eight jails in Kentucky, screened for OUD, and consented (N = 445). Women were asked to name people (alters) who provided them with support in the past 90 days and respond to questions about alters who were named. Bivariate comparisons examined differences in social networks among women who were currently receiving jail-based treatment (29.9 %, n = 133) and those who were incarcerated, but not receiving treatment (70.1 %, n = 312).

Results

On average, women's social support networks consisted of 2.4 alters (range 1–9). Compared to women with OUD who were not receiving treatment, those in treatment were significantly more likely to name at least one alter who was in recovery (57.9 % vs. 43.9 %, p = .007) and less likely to name a partner (21.8 % vs. 37.8 %, p = .001) or someone who had recently used opioids (9.8 % vs. 24.7 %, p < .001). On average, women in treatment also felt significantly closer to their alters (4.70 vs. 4.55 out of 5, p = .021) and rated alters as fulfilling more types of social support functions (5.54 vs. 5.18 out of 6, p < .001) and recovery support functions (2.83 vs. 2.70 out of 3, p = .016).

Conclusion

Results suggest that women participating in jail-based substance use treatment reported more positive social support network attributes, including network function and composition. Future research should assess longitudinal changes in networks and associated differences in recovery outcomes as women are released to the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization. “Yeah, this is not going to work for me”–The impact of federal policy restrictions on methadone continuation upon release from jail or prison A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder Is naloxone where it needs to be? Using spatial analytics to examine equitable distribution of community-based naloxone sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1