普拉提运动对姿势平衡和降低老年人跌倒风险的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101888
Jorge Furtado de Campos Júnior, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Alex Lopes dos Reis, Laura Isabel Martins de Almeida, Larissa Victória Branco, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira
{"title":"普拉提运动对姿势平衡和降低老年人跌倒风险的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jorge Furtado de Campos Júnior,&nbsp;Laís Campos de Oliveira,&nbsp;Alex Lopes dos Reis,&nbsp;Laura Isabel Martins de Almeida,&nbsp;Larissa Victória Branco,&nbsp;Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>and Purpose: Pilates exercises have been recommended to improve postural balance and reduce the risk of falls in older adults. However, the certainty of these recommendations remains unclear. In this sense, our objective was to update the literature and verify the effects of Pilates on postural balance and the risk of falls in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, and PEDro, on April 17, 2023. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis calculations were performed by standardized mean difference (SMD).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 39 studies, involving 1770 participants, were included in the systematic review. Only 14 studies exhibited satisfactory methodological quality. Evidence with very low to moderate certainty showed that Pilates was significantly superior to control groups on indicators of dynamic postural balance (SMD = 1.60 to 0.72), static postural balance (SMD = 0.37 to 0.25), and general state of balance (SMD = 0.76), but not to reduce the number and fear of falls. Furthermore, Pilates was comparable to other forms of exercise for these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pilates can be recommended to enhance static and dynamic postural balance in older adults, but not to reduce the number of falls or the fear of falling. Given that no outcomes showed high certainty of evidence, future studies may alter these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Pilates exercises on postural balance and reduced risk of falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Furtado de Campos Júnior,&nbsp;Laís Campos de Oliveira,&nbsp;Alex Lopes dos Reis,&nbsp;Laura Isabel Martins de Almeida,&nbsp;Larissa Victória Branco,&nbsp;Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>and Purpose: Pilates exercises have been recommended to improve postural balance and reduce the risk of falls in older adults. However, the certainty of these recommendations remains unclear. In this sense, our objective was to update the literature and verify the effects of Pilates on postural balance and the risk of falls in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, and PEDro, on April 17, 2023. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis calculations were performed by standardized mean difference (SMD).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 39 studies, involving 1770 participants, were included in the systematic review. Only 14 studies exhibited satisfactory methodological quality. Evidence with very low to moderate certainty showed that Pilates was significantly superior to control groups on indicators of dynamic postural balance (SMD = 1.60 to 0.72), static postural balance (SMD = 0.37 to 0.25), and general state of balance (SMD = 0.76), but not to reduce the number and fear of falls. Furthermore, Pilates was comparable to other forms of exercise for these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pilates can be recommended to enhance static and dynamic postural balance in older adults, but not to reduce the number of falls or the fear of falling. Given that no outcomes showed high certainty of evidence, future studies may alter these findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000616\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:普拉提运动被推荐用于改善姿势平衡和降低老年人跌倒的风险。然而,这些建议的确定性仍不明确。因此,我们的目标是更新文献并验证普拉提对姿势平衡的影响以及在这一人群中的跌倒风险:于 2023 年 4 月 17 日在多个数据库中进行了系统检索,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、LILACS 和 PEDro。研究的方法学质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估,证据的确定性采用 GRADE 系统进行评估。通过标准化平均差(SMD)进行 Meta 分析计算:系统综述共纳入 39 项研究,涉及 1770 名参与者。只有 14 项研究的方法学质量令人满意。极低至中等确定性的证据显示,普拉提在动态姿势平衡指标(SMD = 1.60 至 0.72)、静态姿势平衡指标(SMD = 0.37 至 0.25)和一般平衡状态(SMD = 0.76)方面明显优于对照组,但在减少跌倒次数和跌倒恐惧方面并不明显。此外,普拉提在这些方面的效果与其他运动形式不相上下:结论:普拉提可用于增强老年人的静态和动态姿势平衡,但不能减少跌倒次数或对跌倒的恐惧。鉴于没有任何结果显示出高度的证据确定性,未来的研究可能会改变这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Pilates exercises on postural balance and reduced risk of falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

and Purpose: Pilates exercises have been recommended to improve postural balance and reduce the risk of falls in older adults. However, the certainty of these recommendations remains unclear. In this sense, our objective was to update the literature and verify the effects of Pilates on postural balance and the risk of falls in this population.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, and PEDro, on April 17, 2023. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis calculations were performed by standardized mean difference (SMD).

Results

A total of 39 studies, involving 1770 participants, were included in the systematic review. Only 14 studies exhibited satisfactory methodological quality. Evidence with very low to moderate certainty showed that Pilates was significantly superior to control groups on indicators of dynamic postural balance (SMD = 1.60 to 0.72), static postural balance (SMD = 0.37 to 0.25), and general state of balance (SMD = 0.76), but not to reduce the number and fear of falls. Furthermore, Pilates was comparable to other forms of exercise for these outcomes.

Conclusions

Pilates can be recommended to enhance static and dynamic postural balance in older adults, but not to reduce the number of falls or the fear of falling. Given that no outcomes showed high certainty of evidence, future studies may alter these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Associations of physical activity, screen time, sleep duration with optimal eating habits among adolescents Practitioner characteristics of osteopaths who treat pregnant women and children: An Australasian perspective from two practice-based research networks Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on venous thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis “There is a way to work together”: A qualitative study on complementary medicine therapists' perceptions of their role in the Swiss healthcare system Effects of mind-body exercise in children with cerebral palsy—A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1