布洛芬/对乙酰氨基酚固定剂量组合作为阿片类药物的替代品,用于治疗常见疼痛类型。

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2382671
Pam Kushner, Bill H McCarberg, Wendy L Wright, Walid Aldoori, Peter Gao, Ahsia Iqbal, Richard Petruschke
{"title":"布洛芬/对乙酰氨基酚固定剂量组合作为阿片类药物的替代品,用于治疗常见疼痛类型。","authors":"Pam Kushner, Bill H McCarberg, Wendy L Wright, Walid Aldoori, Peter Gao, Ahsia Iqbal, Richard Petruschke","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2382671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioids are frequently used first line to manage acute pain in a variety of settings; however, the use of nonprescription analgesics for acute pain is recognized by experts as a practical and effective opioid-sparing strategy. Variations in dosages and formulations and a lack of standardization in reporting clinical data hinder the awareness of nonprescription treatments and recommendation of their use before opioids and other prescription options. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of two common nonprescription analgesics, ibuprofen (IBU) and acetaminophen (APAP), is an appealing alternative to opioids in acute pain settings with a range of potential benefits. This narrative review evaluates the evidence in support of IBU/APAP FDCs containing IBU (≤1200 mg/day) and APAP (≤4000 mg/day), the nonprescription maximum daily doses in Canada and the United States, as alternatives to opioids and as a means to reduce the need for rescue opioid medication in acute pain management. A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies that directly compared IBU/APAP FDCs with opioids or nonopioids and measured the need for opioid rescue therapy in acute pain. Across studies, IBU/APAP FDCs consistently demonstrated pain relief similar to or better than opioid and nonopioid comparators and reliably reduced the use of rescue opioids with fewer adverse events. Based on these data, healthcare clinicians should consider FDC nonprescription analgesics as a potential first-line option for the management of acute pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"594-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ibuprofen/acetaminophen fixed-dose combination as an alternative to opioids in management of common pain types.\",\"authors\":\"Pam Kushner, Bill H McCarberg, Wendy L Wright, Walid Aldoori, Peter Gao, Ahsia Iqbal, Richard Petruschke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00325481.2024.2382671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Opioids are frequently used first line to manage acute pain in a variety of settings; however, the use of nonprescription analgesics for acute pain is recognized by experts as a practical and effective opioid-sparing strategy. Variations in dosages and formulations and a lack of standardization in reporting clinical data hinder the awareness of nonprescription treatments and recommendation of their use before opioids and other prescription options. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of two common nonprescription analgesics, ibuprofen (IBU) and acetaminophen (APAP), is an appealing alternative to opioids in acute pain settings with a range of potential benefits. This narrative review evaluates the evidence in support of IBU/APAP FDCs containing IBU (≤1200 mg/day) and APAP (≤4000 mg/day), the nonprescription maximum daily doses in Canada and the United States, as alternatives to opioids and as a means to reduce the need for rescue opioid medication in acute pain management. A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies that directly compared IBU/APAP FDCs with opioids or nonopioids and measured the need for opioid rescue therapy in acute pain. Across studies, IBU/APAP FDCs consistently demonstrated pain relief similar to or better than opioid and nonopioid comparators and reliably reduced the use of rescue opioids with fewer adverse events. Based on these data, healthcare clinicians should consider FDC nonprescription analgesics as a potential first-line option for the management of acute pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"594-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2382671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2382671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种情况下,阿片类药物是治疗急性疼痛的常用一线药物;然而,专家们认为使用非处方药镇痛剂治疗急性疼痛是一种实用、有效的阿片类药物节约策略。剂量和配方的差异以及临床数据报告缺乏标准化,阻碍了人们对非处方药治疗的认识,也阻碍了在使用阿片类药物和其他处方药之前推荐使用非处方药治疗。布洛芬(IBU)和对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)这两种常见的非处方镇痛药的固定剂量复合制剂(FDC)是急性疼痛治疗中阿片类药物的一种有吸引力的替代品,具有一系列潜在的益处。本综述评估了支持含有 IBU(≤1200 毫克/天)和 APAP(≤4000 毫克/天)(加拿大和美国的非处方最大日剂量)的 IBU/APAP FDC 作为阿片类药物替代品的证据,以及作为减少急性疼痛治疗中阿片类药物抢救需求的一种手段的证据。我们进行了文献检索,以确定直接比较 IBU/APAP FDC 与阿片类药物或非阿片类药物的临床研究,并对急性疼痛时阿片类药物抢救治疗的需求进行测量。在所有研究中,IBU/APAP FDC 的疼痛缓解效果始终与阿片类药物和非阿片类药物的比较药相似或更好,并且可靠地减少了阿片类药物救援治疗的使用,同时不良反应较少。基于这些数据,医疗临床医生应考虑将 FDC 非处方镇痛药作为治疗急性疼痛的潜在一线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ibuprofen/acetaminophen fixed-dose combination as an alternative to opioids in management of common pain types.

Opioids are frequently used first line to manage acute pain in a variety of settings; however, the use of nonprescription analgesics for acute pain is recognized by experts as a practical and effective opioid-sparing strategy. Variations in dosages and formulations and a lack of standardization in reporting clinical data hinder the awareness of nonprescription treatments and recommendation of their use before opioids and other prescription options. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of two common nonprescription analgesics, ibuprofen (IBU) and acetaminophen (APAP), is an appealing alternative to opioids in acute pain settings with a range of potential benefits. This narrative review evaluates the evidence in support of IBU/APAP FDCs containing IBU (≤1200 mg/day) and APAP (≤4000 mg/day), the nonprescription maximum daily doses in Canada and the United States, as alternatives to opioids and as a means to reduce the need for rescue opioid medication in acute pain management. A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies that directly compared IBU/APAP FDCs with opioids or nonopioids and measured the need for opioid rescue therapy in acute pain. Across studies, IBU/APAP FDCs consistently demonstrated pain relief similar to or better than opioid and nonopioid comparators and reliably reduced the use of rescue opioids with fewer adverse events. Based on these data, healthcare clinicians should consider FDC nonprescription analgesics as a potential first-line option for the management of acute pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statement of Retraction: The interaction between insulin resistance and Alzheimer's disease: a review article. Analysis of influencing factors of exercise systolic blood pressure response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease aged 40-60 years. Impact of companion support during labor on postnatal depression and birth satisfaction: a prospective cohort study. Must we remain blind to the need for clinical ethics support services in Africa? Eyes on Nigeria. Skin ecchymosis in migraine patients: a retrospective and exploratory study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1