图像引导下经皮肝穿刺活检的安全观察期有多长?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2
Kunal Sehgal, Fergus Taylor, Matthew Van Wees, Kenny Li, Diederick Willem De Boo, Lee Anne Slater
{"title":"图像引导下经皮肝穿刺活检的安全观察期有多长?","authors":"Kunal Sehgal, Fergus Taylor, Matthew Van Wees, Kenny Li, Diederick Willem De Boo, Lee Anne Slater","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current observation period post-liver biopsy is typically 4 h. This study investigates the safety of reducing the observation period after percutaneous liver biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in the Radiology Department of a tertiary centre were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patient demographics, procedure details and complication data were collected from the electronic medical records. Complications were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification. Conditional survival probabilities were calculated for the 4-h observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1125 patients, 275 complications were seen; 255 grade 1, 15 grade 2 and five grade 3. Post-procedural pain represented 93% (256) of complications, whereas post-procedural haemorrhage occurred in 17 (6%) patients: 13 were of grade 2 severity requiring prolonged observation, and 4 were of grade 3 severity. Of these grade 3 complications, two required blood transfusion whereas two required embolization. A total of 215 (78%) complications occurred within 1 h, 244 (89%) within 2 h of observation. 16 (94%) of 17 post-procedural haemorrhages occurred within 2 h post-biopsy. If complication-free after 2 h, the probability of experiencing a complication within the next 2 h was 4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of complications were identified within 2 h of observation. Complications recognised after this period were largely pain-related, with only one grade 3 complication seen (post-procedural haemorrhage).Our findings suggest 2 h of post-procedural observation may be safe.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2B, Retrospective Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Safe Observation Period for Image-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsies?\",\"authors\":\"Kunal Sehgal, Fergus Taylor, Matthew Van Wees, Kenny Li, Diederick Willem De Boo, Lee Anne Slater\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current observation period post-liver biopsy is typically 4 h. This study investigates the safety of reducing the observation period after percutaneous liver biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in the Radiology Department of a tertiary centre were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patient demographics, procedure details and complication data were collected from the electronic medical records. Complications were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification. Conditional survival probabilities were calculated for the 4-h observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1125 patients, 275 complications were seen; 255 grade 1, 15 grade 2 and five grade 3. Post-procedural pain represented 93% (256) of complications, whereas post-procedural haemorrhage occurred in 17 (6%) patients: 13 were of grade 2 severity requiring prolonged observation, and 4 were of grade 3 severity. Of these grade 3 complications, two required blood transfusion whereas two required embolization. A total of 215 (78%) complications occurred within 1 h, 244 (89%) within 2 h of observation. 16 (94%) of 17 post-procedural haemorrhages occurred within 2 h post-biopsy. If complication-free after 2 h, the probability of experiencing a complication within the next 2 h was 4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of complications were identified within 2 h of observation. Complications recognised after this period were largely pain-related, with only one grade 3 complication seen (post-procedural haemorrhage).Our findings suggest 2 h of post-procedural observation may be safe.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2B, Retrospective Cohort Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03800-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前肝脏活检后的观察期通常为 4 小时。本研究探讨了缩短经皮肝脏活检后观察期的安全性:这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年至 2022 年期间在一家三级中心放射科接受经皮肝活检的患者。研究人员从电子病历中收集了患者的人口统计学特征、手术细节和并发症数据。并发症根据欧洲心血管和介入放射学会(CIRSE)的分类进行分级。计算了4小时观察期内的条件生存概率:结果:在1125名患者中,共出现了275例并发症,其中255例为1级,15例为2级,5例为3级。术后疼痛占并发症的 93%(256 例),17 例(6%)患者出现术后出血:其中 13 例为 2 级严重并发症,需要长期观察,4 例为 3 级严重并发症。在这些 3 级并发症中,2 人需要输血,2 人需要栓塞治疗。共有 215 例(78%)并发症发生在观察 1 小时内,244 例(89%)发生在观察 2 小时内。17 例术后出血中有 16 例(94%)发生在活组织检查后 2 小时内。如果2小时后未出现并发症,那么在接下来的2小时内出现并发症的概率为4%:结论:大多数并发症都是在观察后 2 小时内发现的。我们的研究结果表明,术后观察 2 小时可能是安全的:证据级别:2B级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the Safe Observation Period for Image-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsies?

Purpose: Current observation period post-liver biopsy is typically 4 h. This study investigates the safety of reducing the observation period after percutaneous liver biopsy.

Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in the Radiology Department of a tertiary centre were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patient demographics, procedure details and complication data were collected from the electronic medical records. Complications were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification. Conditional survival probabilities were calculated for the 4-h observation period.

Results: Among 1125 patients, 275 complications were seen; 255 grade 1, 15 grade 2 and five grade 3. Post-procedural pain represented 93% (256) of complications, whereas post-procedural haemorrhage occurred in 17 (6%) patients: 13 were of grade 2 severity requiring prolonged observation, and 4 were of grade 3 severity. Of these grade 3 complications, two required blood transfusion whereas two required embolization. A total of 215 (78%) complications occurred within 1 h, 244 (89%) within 2 h of observation. 16 (94%) of 17 post-procedural haemorrhages occurred within 2 h post-biopsy. If complication-free after 2 h, the probability of experiencing a complication within the next 2 h was 4%.

Conclusion: The majority of complications were identified within 2 h of observation. Complications recognised after this period were largely pain-related, with only one grade 3 complication seen (post-procedural haemorrhage).Our findings suggest 2 h of post-procedural observation may be safe.

Level of evidence: Level 2B, Retrospective Cohort Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
期刊最新文献
Technical Considerations for Safety and Efficacy: Microballoon-Occluded Transcatheter Embolization Using n-butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate for Treatment of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation Transpleural Inferior Phrenic Artery to Pulmonary Artery Fistula: An Increasingly Common and Important Vascular Anomaly Percutaneous Management of an Unstable Pathological Fracture of L5 Using Vertical Presacral Screw Fixation and Cementoplasty Non-perforating Temporary Diameter Reduction Ties for Physician-Modified Endografts Invited Commentary on using ChatGPT to Improve Readability of Interventional Radiology Procedure Descriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1