抛光和漂白对 CAD/CAM 整体材料的颜色、白度和透光度的影响。

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13288

Ranulfo Castillo Peña, Alejandro Cardenas Ramos, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis, Lívia Nordi Dovigo, Jean-Pierre Guy Olivier Salomon, María Del Mar Pérez, Renata Garcia Fonseca

{"title":"抛光和漂白对 CAD/CAM 整体材料的颜色、白度和透光度的影响。","authors":"Ranulfo Castillo Peña, Alejandro Cardenas Ramos, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis, Lívia Nordi Dovigo, Jean-Pierre Guy Olivier Salomon, María Del Mar Pérez, Renata Garcia Fonseca","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of polishing and bleaching on the recovery of lightness, color, whiteness, and relative translucency parameter (RTP) in CAD/CAM materials and changes in these properties when another staining in coffee was conducted after the treatments.Materials and methods: Disks of Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), IPS Empress CAD (EMP), IPS e.max CAD (EMAX), and Vita Suprinity (VS) were (1) not treated (control), (2) polished with Proxyt or (3) Ceramisté, (4) bleached with Opalescence PF or (5) Whiteness HP Blue, and (6) air polished with Clinpro Prophy Powder. CIE L*a*b* color coordinates were registered at baseline (R0), after staining with coffee for 30 min daily for 36.5 days and treatment (R1), and after another staining (R2). Differences (R1-R0 and R2-R0) in lightness (ΔL00), color (ΔE00), RTP (ΔRTP00), and whiteness (ΔWID) were evaluated by mixed repeated measures ANOVA and 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05) and interpreted in function of their respective 50:50% PT and AT thresholds. Topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: In LU, Opalescence PF and Proxyt decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {\\mathrm{R}}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{WI}}_{\\mathrm{D}\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and showed lower <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{WI}}_{\\mathrm{D}\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> . In VE, all treatments decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{WI}}_{\\mathrm{D}\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , whereas <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{WI}}_{\\mathrm{D}\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> were lower in Opalescence PF than in the control group. In both moments, ΔE00 and ΔWID in EMP (also ΔL00) and EMAX were higher in Opalescence PF than in the control group, from which the other treatments did not differ in R1-R0. In EMP, <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> in Whiteness HP Blue (also <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) and Proxyt were also higher in comparison to the control group and in VS, Ceramisté decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta L}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <msub><mi>P</mi> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mi>-</mi> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\varDelta RT{P}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , whereas Opalescence PF increased <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mtext>ΔRTP</mtext> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{RTP}}_{00\\left({R}_1\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> . <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta E}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of Ceramisté and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\Delta \\mathrm{WI}}_{\\mathrm{D}\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <msub><mi>P</mi> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>-</mi> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\varDelta RT{P}_{00\\left({R}_2\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of Proxyt were lower than those of the control group.Conclusions: The most suitable treatment to recover the lightness, color, whiteness, and RTP without changing these properties after another coffee exposure is material-dependent.Clinical significance: Although the effectiveness of the treatment was material-dependent, Proxyt was the only treatment that promoted clinically acceptable changes for both LU and VE, while for purely ceramic materials, this condition was observed with Ceramisté and Clinpro Prophy Powder.","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of polishing and bleaching on color, whiteness, and translucency of CAD/CAM monolithic materials.\",\"authors\":\"Ranulfo Castillo Peña, Alejandro Cardenas Ramos, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis, Lívia Nordi Dovigo, Jean-Pierre Guy Olivier Salomon, María Del Mar Pérez, Renata Garcia Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the effect of polishing and bleaching on the recovery of lightness, color, whiteness, and relative translucency parameter (RTP) in CAD/CAM materials and changes in these properties when another staining in coffee was conducted after the treatments.Materials and methods: Disks of Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), IPS Empress CAD (EMP), IPS e.max CAD (EMAX), and Vita Suprinity (VS) were (1) not treated (control), (2) polished with Proxyt or (3) Ceramisté, (4) bleached with Opalescence PF or (5) Whiteness HP Blue, and (6) air polished with Clinpro Prophy Powder. CIE L*a*b* color coordinates were registered at baseline (R0), after staining with coffee for 30 min daily for 36.5 days and treatment (R1), and after another staining (R2). Differences (R1-R0 and R2-R0) in lightness (ΔL00), color (ΔE00), RTP (ΔRTP00), and whiteness (ΔWID) were evaluated by mixed repeated measures ANOVA and 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05) and interpreted in function of their respective 50:50% PT and AT thresholds. Topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: In LU, Opalescence PF and Proxyt decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {\\\\mathrm{R}}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{WI}}_{\\\\mathrm{D}\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and showed lower <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{WI}}_{\\\\mathrm{D}\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> . In VE, all treatments decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{WI}}_{\\\\mathrm{D}\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , whereas <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{WI}}_{\\\\mathrm{D}\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> were lower in Opalescence PF than in the control group. In both moments, ΔE00 and ΔWID in EMP (also ΔL00) and EMAX were higher in Opalescence PF than in the control group, from which the other treatments did not differ in R1-R0. In EMP, <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> in Whiteness HP Blue (also <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) and Proxyt were also higher in comparison to the control group and in VS, Ceramisté decreased <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>L</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta L}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , and <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <msub><mi>P</mi> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mi>-</mi> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\varDelta RT{P}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , whereas Opalescence PF increased <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mtext>ΔRTP</mtext> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{RTP}}_{00\\\\left({R}_1\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> . <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta E}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of Ceramisté and <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>ΔWI</mi> <mrow><mi>D</mi> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta \\\\mathrm{WI}}_{\\\\mathrm{D}\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> <msub><mi>P</mi> <mrow><mn>00</mn> <mfenced> <mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>-</mi> <msub><mi>R</mi> <mn>0</mn></msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\varDelta RT{P}_{00\\\\left({R}_2\\\\hbox{--} {R}_0\\\\right)} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of Proxyt were lower than those of the control group.Conclusions: The most suitable treatment to recover the lightness, color, whiteness, and RTP without changing these properties after another coffee exposure is material-dependent.Clinical significance: Although the effectiveness of the treatment was material-dependent, Proxyt was the only treatment that promoted clinically acceptable changes for both LU and VE, while for purely ceramic materials, this condition was observed with Ceramisté and Clinpro Prophy Powder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13288\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估抛光和漂白对 CAD/CAM 材料的亮度、颜色、白度和相对半透明参数（RTP）恢复的影响，以及在处理后再次进行咖啡染色时这些性能的变化：对 Lava Ultimate (LU)、Vita Enamic (VE)、IPS Empress CAD (EMP)、IPS e.max CAD (EMAX) 和 Vita Suprinity (VS) 的牙盘进行以下处理：(1) 未处理（对照组）；(2) 用 Proxyt 或 (3) Ceramisté 抛光；(4) 用 Opalescence PF 或 (5) Whiteness HP Blue 漂白；(6) 用 Clinpro Prophy Powder 空气抛光。分别在基线（R0）、每天用咖啡染色 30 分钟（36.5 天）和治疗后（R1）以及再次染色后（R2）登记 CIE L*a*b* 色坐标。通过混合重复测量方差分析和 95% 置信区间（α = 0.05）对亮度（ΔL00）、颜色（ΔE00）、RTP（ΔRTP00）和白度（ΔWID）的差异（R1-R0 和 R2-R0）进行评估，并根据其各自 50:50% PT 和 AT 阈值进行解释。通过扫描电子显微镜（SEM）对地形进行了评估：在LU中，Opalescence PF和Proxyt降低了Δ L 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta L}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ ，Δ E 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {\mathrm{R}}_0\right)} $$ 、和 ΔWI D R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{WI}}_{\mathrm{D}\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 并显示了较低的Δ L 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta L}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、 Δ E 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ ，以及 ΔWI D R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{WI}}_{\mathrm{D}\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 。在 VE 中，所有治疗都减少了 Δ L 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta L}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、 Δ E 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ , 和 ΔWI D R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{WI}}_{\mathrm{D}\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、而 Δ L 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta L}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ , Δ E 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、和 ΔWI D R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{WI}}_{m\athrm{D} （{R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)}left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)}$$在Opalescence PF中低于对照组。在两个时刻中，EMP 中的ΔE00 和 ΔWID（也是 ΔL00）以及 EMAX 在 Opalescence PF 中都高于对照组，而在 R1-R0 中与其他处理没有差异。在 EMP 中，Whiteness HP Blue 中的Δ E 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {Delta E}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ （也是 Δ L 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {Delta L}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ ）和 Proxyt 也比对照组和 VS 中的高、Ceramisté 减少了 Δ L 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {Delta L}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、 Δ E 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 和 Δ R T P 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ \varDelta RT{P}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 、而 Opalescence PF 增加了 ΔRTP 00 R 1 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{RTP}}_{00\left({R}_1\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 。 Ceramisté 的 Δ E 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta E}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{--} {R}_0\right)} $$ 和 ΔWI D R 2 - R 0 $$ {\Delta \mathrm{WI}}_{mathrm{D}\left({R}_2\hbox{-} {R}_0\right)} $$ .-$$ 和 Δ R T P 00 R 2 - R 0 $$ Proxyt 的 \varDelta RT{P}_{00\left({R}_2\hbox{-} {R}_0\right)}$ 低于对照组。结论要想在再次接触咖啡后恢复亮度、颜色、白度和 RTP 而不改变这些特性，最合适的处理方法取决于材料：虽然治疗效果与材料有关，但 Proxyt 是唯一一种能促进 LU 和 VE 发生临床上可接受的变化的治疗方法，而对于纯陶瓷材料，Ceramisté 和 Clinpro Prophy Powder 都能观察到这种情况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Effect of polishing and bleaching on color, whiteness, and translucency of CAD/CAM monolithic materials.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of polishing and bleaching on the recovery of lightness, color, whiteness, and relative translucency parameter (RTP) in CAD/CAM materials and changes in these properties when another staining in coffee was conducted after the treatments.

Materials and methods: Disks of Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), IPS Empress CAD (EMP), IPS e.max CAD (EMAX), and Vita Suprinity (VS) were (1) not treated (control), (2) polished with Proxyt or (3) Ceramisté, (4) bleached with Opalescence PF or (5) Whiteness HP Blue, and (6) air polished with Clinpro Prophy Powder. CIE L*a*b* color coordinates were registered at baseline (R₀), after staining with coffee for 30 min daily for 36.5 days and treatment (R₁), and after another staining (R₂). Differences (R₁-R₀ and R₂-R₀) in lightness (ΔL₀₀), color (ΔE₀₀), RTP (ΔRTP₀₀), and whiteness (ΔWI_D) were evaluated by mixed repeated measures ANOVA and 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05) and interpreted in function of their respective 50:50% PT and AT thresholds. Topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results: In LU, Opalescence PF and Proxyt decreased ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , and ${ΔWI}_{D (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ and showed lower ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ , ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ , and ${ΔWI}_{D (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ . In VE, all treatments decreased ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , and ${ΔWI}_{D (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , whereas ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ , ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ , and ${ΔWI}_{D (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ were lower in Opalescence PF than in the control group. In both moments, ΔE₀₀ and ΔWI_D in EMP (also ΔL₀₀) and EMAX were higher in Opalescence PF than in the control group, from which the other treatments did not differ in R₁-R₀. In EMP, ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ in Whiteness HP Blue (also ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ ) and Proxyt were also higher in comparison to the control group and in VS, Ceramisté decreased ${Δ L}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , and $Δ R T P_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ , whereas Opalescence PF increased ${ΔRTP}_{00 (R_{1} - R_{0})}$ . ${Δ E}_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ of Ceramisté and ${ΔWI}_{D (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ and $Δ R T P_{00 (R_{2} - R_{0})}$ of Proxyt were lower than those of the control group.

Conclusions: The most suitable treatment to recover the lightness, color, whiteness, and RTP without changing these properties after another coffee exposure is material-dependent.

Clinical significance: Although the effectiveness of the treatment was material-dependent, Proxyt was the only treatment that promoted clinically acceptable changes for both LU and VE, while for purely ceramic materials, this condition was observed with Ceramisté and Clinpro Prophy Powder.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

124

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics