通过模拟进行可用性测试:采用人为因素方法优化 NEAR4PEM 插管前检查表

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003223
Robyn Wing, Michael P Goldman, Monica M Prieto, Kelsey A Miller, Mariju Baluyot, Khoon-Yen Tay, Anita Bharath, Deepa Patel, Emily Greenwald, Ethan P Larsen, Lee A Polikoff, Benjamin T Kerrey, Akira Nishisaki, Joshua Nagler
{"title":"通过模拟进行可用性测试:采用人为因素方法优化 NEAR4PEM 插管前检查表","authors":"Robyn Wing, Michael P Goldman, Monica M Prieto, Kelsey A Miller, Mariju Baluyot, Khoon-Yen Tay, Anita Bharath, Deepa Patel, Emily Greenwald, Ethan P Larsen, Lee A Polikoff, Benjamin T Kerrey, Akira Nishisaki, Joshua Nagler","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To inform development of a preintubation checklist for pediatric emergency departments via multicenter usability testing of a prototype checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, mixed methods study across 7 sites in the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) collaborative. Pediatric emergency medicine attending physicians and senior fellows at each site were first oriented to a checklist prototype, including content previously identified using a modified Delphi approach. Each site used the checklist in 2 simulated cases: an \"easy airway\" and a \"difficult airway\" scenario. Facilitators recorded verbalization, completion, and timing of checklist items. After each simulation, participants completed an anonymous usability survey. Structured debriefings were used to gather additional feedback on checklist usability. Comments from the surveys and debriefing were qualitatively analyzed using a framework approach. Responses informed human factors-based optimization of the checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five pediatric emergency medicine physicians/fellows (4-13 per site) participated. Participants found the prototype checklist to be helpful, easy to use, clear, and of appropriate length. During the simulations, 93% of checklist items were verbalized and more than 80% were completed. Median time to checklist completion was 6.2 minutes (interquartile range, 4.8-7.1) for the first scenario and 4.2 minutes (interquartile range, 2.7-5.8) for the second. Survey and debriefing data identified the following strengths: facilitating a shared mental model, cognitively offloading the team leader, and prompting contingency planning. Suggestions for checklist improvement included clarifying specific items, providing more detailed prompts, and allowing institution-specific customization. Integration of these data with human factors heuristic inspection resulted in a final checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based, human factors usability testing of the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Preintubation Checklist allowed optimization prior to clinical implementation. Next steps involve integration into real-world settings utilizing rigorous implementation science strategies, with concurrent evaluation of the impact on patient outcomes and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Testing Via Simulation: Optimizing the NEAR4PEM Preintubation Checklist With a Human Factors Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn Wing, Michael P Goldman, Monica M Prieto, Kelsey A Miller, Mariju Baluyot, Khoon-Yen Tay, Anita Bharath, Deepa Patel, Emily Greenwald, Ethan P Larsen, Lee A Polikoff, Benjamin T Kerrey, Akira Nishisaki, Joshua Nagler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To inform development of a preintubation checklist for pediatric emergency departments via multicenter usability testing of a prototype checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, mixed methods study across 7 sites in the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) collaborative. Pediatric emergency medicine attending physicians and senior fellows at each site were first oriented to a checklist prototype, including content previously identified using a modified Delphi approach. Each site used the checklist in 2 simulated cases: an \\\"easy airway\\\" and a \\\"difficult airway\\\" scenario. Facilitators recorded verbalization, completion, and timing of checklist items. After each simulation, participants completed an anonymous usability survey. Structured debriefings were used to gather additional feedback on checklist usability. Comments from the surveys and debriefing were qualitatively analyzed using a framework approach. Responses informed human factors-based optimization of the checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five pediatric emergency medicine physicians/fellows (4-13 per site) participated. Participants found the prototype checklist to be helpful, easy to use, clear, and of appropriate length. During the simulations, 93% of checklist items were verbalized and more than 80% were completed. Median time to checklist completion was 6.2 minutes (interquartile range, 4.8-7.1) for the first scenario and 4.2 minutes (interquartile range, 2.7-5.8) for the second. Survey and debriefing data identified the following strengths: facilitating a shared mental model, cognitively offloading the team leader, and prompting contingency planning. Suggestions for checklist improvement included clarifying specific items, providing more detailed prompts, and allowing institution-specific customization. Integration of these data with human factors heuristic inspection resulted in a final checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based, human factors usability testing of the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Preintubation Checklist allowed optimization prior to clinical implementation. Next steps involve integration into real-world settings utilizing rigorous implementation science strategies, with concurrent evaluation of the impact on patient outcomes and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过对原型核对表进行多中心可用性测试,为儿科急诊科插管前核对表的开发提供信息:这是一项前瞻性的混合方法研究,涉及全国儿科急诊气道注册(NEAR4PEM)合作的 7 个站点。各研究机构的儿科急诊医学主治医师和高级研究员首先了解了核对表原型,包括之前通过改良德尔菲法确定的内容。每个培训基地在 2 个模拟病例中使用核对表:"简易气道 "和 "困难气道 "情景。主持人记录核对表项目的口头表达、完成情况和时间。每次模拟后,参与者都要填写一份匿名可用性调查。结构化汇报用于收集有关核对表可用性的更多反馈。采用框架方法对调查和汇报中的意见进行了定性分析。结果:55名儿科急诊科医生/研究员(每个地点4-13名)参加了此次活动。参与者认为原型核对表很有帮助、易于使用、清晰明了、长度适当。在模拟过程中,93% 的核对表项目得到了口头表达,80% 以上的项目得以完成。完成核对表的中位时间为:第一种情景 6.2 分钟(四分位数间距为 4.8-7.1),第二种情景 4.2 分钟(四分位数间距为 2.7-5.8)。调查和汇报数据发现了以下优点:促进形成共同的心智模式、在认知上减轻团队领导者的负担以及促使制定应急计划。对核对表的改进建议包括:明确具体项目、提供更详细的提示以及允许针对特定机构进行定制。将这些数据与人为因素启发式检查相结合,最终形成了检查表:结论:在临床实施之前,对全国儿科急诊气道注册中心插管前核对表进行了基于模拟的人为因素可用性测试,从而对核对表进行了优化。接下来的步骤包括利用严格的实施科学策略将其整合到实际环境中,同时评估其对患者预后和安全性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability Testing Via Simulation: Optimizing the NEAR4PEM Preintubation Checklist With a Human Factors Approach.

Objectives: To inform development of a preintubation checklist for pediatric emergency departments via multicenter usability testing of a prototype checklist.

Methods: This was a prospective, mixed methods study across 7 sites in the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) collaborative. Pediatric emergency medicine attending physicians and senior fellows at each site were first oriented to a checklist prototype, including content previously identified using a modified Delphi approach. Each site used the checklist in 2 simulated cases: an "easy airway" and a "difficult airway" scenario. Facilitators recorded verbalization, completion, and timing of checklist items. After each simulation, participants completed an anonymous usability survey. Structured debriefings were used to gather additional feedback on checklist usability. Comments from the surveys and debriefing were qualitatively analyzed using a framework approach. Responses informed human factors-based optimization of the checklist.

Results: Fifty-five pediatric emergency medicine physicians/fellows (4-13 per site) participated. Participants found the prototype checklist to be helpful, easy to use, clear, and of appropriate length. During the simulations, 93% of checklist items were verbalized and more than 80% were completed. Median time to checklist completion was 6.2 minutes (interquartile range, 4.8-7.1) for the first scenario and 4.2 minutes (interquartile range, 2.7-5.8) for the second. Survey and debriefing data identified the following strengths: facilitating a shared mental model, cognitively offloading the team leader, and prompting contingency planning. Suggestions for checklist improvement included clarifying specific items, providing more detailed prompts, and allowing institution-specific customization. Integration of these data with human factors heuristic inspection resulted in a final checklist.

Conclusions: Simulation-based, human factors usability testing of the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Preintubation Checklist allowed optimization prior to clinical implementation. Next steps involve integration into real-world settings utilizing rigorous implementation science strategies, with concurrent evaluation of the impact on patient outcomes and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Race on Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in the Emergency Department. Ultrasound Imaging of Various Ingested Foreign Bodies in an Ex Vivo Intestinal Model. Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and Bacteremia in Infants Infected With COVID-19. The Effect of Step Stool Use on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in Young Children: Findings From the Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) Collaborative. Pediatric Off-Road Vehicle Injuries: Side-by-Sides Worse for the Upper Extremity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1