新型全身炎症标志物可预测接受血管内腹主动脉瘤修补术患者的全因死亡率

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2506202
Wen-Xin Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wu, Ning Zhao, Yong-Peng Diao, Yong Lan, Yong-Jun Li
{"title":"新型全身炎症标志物可预测接受血管内腹主动脉瘤修补术患者的全因死亡率","authors":"Wen-Xin Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wu, Ning Zhao, Yong-Peng Diao, Yong Lan, Yong-Jun Li","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2506202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) and reduced HRR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR <math><mo>></mo></math> 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR <math><mo><</mo></math> 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Xin Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wu, Ning Zhao, Yong-Peng Diao, Yong Lan, Yong-Jun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2506202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) and reduced HRR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR <math><mo>></mo></math> 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR <math><mo><</mo></math> 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床上有用的长期生存风险分层预测指标有助于选择接受血管内腹主动脉瘤(EVAR)手术的患者。本研究旨在分析围手术期新型全身炎症指标(SIMs)对 EVAR 长期死亡率的预后意义,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值(HRR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SIII)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI):对在北京医院血管外科接受首次 EVAR 手术的 147 例连续患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为死亡组(37 人)和存活组(110 人)。使用接收器操作特征曲线确定与死亡率关系最密切的阈值。对每种 SIM 与死亡率之间的关系进行了 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。使用限制性立方样条和多变量 Cox 回归分析研究了 SIMs 与生存之间的关系:研究共纳入 147 名患者,平均随访时间为(34.28 ± 22.95)个月。死亡患者的 NLR 明显升高(P 0.001),HRR 明显降低(P 0.001)。高 NLR 组(NLR > 2.77)和低 HRR 组(HRR 10.64)的 Kaplan-Meier 估计死亡率明显更高。在多变量分析中,危险比(HR)为 0.833(95% 置信区间(95% CI):0.71-0.97,P 0.021),在预测死亡方面具有统计学意义:结论:在接受择期EVAR手术的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者中,术前较高的NLR和较低的HRR与较低的长期生存率有关。多变量 Cox 回归显示,术前 HRR 降低是增加 EVAR 术后死亡风险的独立风险因素。NLR 和 HRR 等 SIMs 可用于未来接受 EVAR 的 AAA 患者的临床风险预测方法。不过,还需要更多的前瞻性队列研究来确定这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Background: Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results: The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 ± 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (p < 0.001) and reduced HRR (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR > 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR < 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, p < 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Vectorcardiogram Characteristic and Its Predictive Value for Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction of Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Advantages of using Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Predicting 5-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Relating to Coronary Artery Disease in Women. Bicuspid Aortic Valve, from the Unknown till the Perfection of the Species. Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Clinical Questions with Complex Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1