Eva Santos , Gaetano Lucisano , Frank J.M.F. Dor , Michelle Willicombe
{"title":"DSA 阳性、交叉配型阴性活体肾移植与继续等待 HLA 相容的已故捐献者的结果比较。","authors":"Eva Santos , Gaetano Lucisano , Frank J.M.F. Dor , Michelle Willicombe","doi":"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The clinical relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies in the setting of a negative crossmatch (DSA + XM-) remains controversial. In this study we investigate the outcomes of patients with a DSA + XM- living donor (LDi) who proceeded with an HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplant compared with those who waited for an HLA-compatible deceased donor (DDc).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We investigated 359 patients on the transplant waiting list who had at least one potential HLAi living donor, from which 203 DSA + XM- pairs were identified and outcomes analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 203 patients, 96 (47.3%) received a LD transplant: 52/96 (54.2%) a LDi, and 44/96 (45.8%) an alternative compatible LD. In addition, 107 patients out of 203(52.7%) waited for a DDc, of which 47(43.9%) were subsequently transplanted. Our adjusted analysis showed that the LDi transplantation did not offer a superior patient survival over waiting for a DDc transplant. For those transplanted, there was no difference in patient (<em>p</em> = 0.065) or death censored allograft survival (<em>p</em> = 0.37) between DDc and LDi recipients. However, there was a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.043) and antibody-mediated rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.005) in the LDi group. Having a high pre-transplant calculated reaction frequency and preformed DSA to both class I and class II antigens were associated with inferior outcomes in the LDi transplants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the lack of difference in allograft survival between LDi and DDc transplants, in the absence of an alternative compatible living donor, proceeding with a LDi should be supported despite a higher rejection risk, providing individual risk assessment and shared decision making is undertaken.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23304,"journal":{"name":"Transplant immunology","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative outcomes of DSA positive, crossmatch negative living donor kidney transplants versus remaining on the waitlist for an HLA compatible deceased donor\",\"authors\":\"Eva Santos , Gaetano Lucisano , Frank J.M.F. Dor , Michelle Willicombe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The clinical relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies in the setting of a negative crossmatch (DSA + XM-) remains controversial. In this study we investigate the outcomes of patients with a DSA + XM- living donor (LDi) who proceeded with an HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplant compared with those who waited for an HLA-compatible deceased donor (DDc).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We investigated 359 patients on the transplant waiting list who had at least one potential HLAi living donor, from which 203 DSA + XM- pairs were identified and outcomes analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 203 patients, 96 (47.3%) received a LD transplant: 52/96 (54.2%) a LDi, and 44/96 (45.8%) an alternative compatible LD. In addition, 107 patients out of 203(52.7%) waited for a DDc, of which 47(43.9%) were subsequently transplanted. Our adjusted analysis showed that the LDi transplantation did not offer a superior patient survival over waiting for a DDc transplant. For those transplanted, there was no difference in patient (<em>p</em> = 0.065) or death censored allograft survival (<em>p</em> = 0.37) between DDc and LDi recipients. However, there was a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.043) and antibody-mediated rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.005) in the LDi group. Having a high pre-transplant calculated reaction frequency and preformed DSA to both class I and class II antigens were associated with inferior outcomes in the LDi transplants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the lack of difference in allograft survival between LDi and DDc transplants, in the absence of an alternative compatible living donor, proceeding with a LDi should be supported despite a higher rejection risk, providing individual risk assessment and shared decision making is undertaken.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096632742400114X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096632742400114X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative outcomes of DSA positive, crossmatch negative living donor kidney transplants versus remaining on the waitlist for an HLA compatible deceased donor
Introduction
The clinical relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies in the setting of a negative crossmatch (DSA + XM-) remains controversial. In this study we investigate the outcomes of patients with a DSA + XM- living donor (LDi) who proceeded with an HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplant compared with those who waited for an HLA-compatible deceased donor (DDc).
Materials and methods
We investigated 359 patients on the transplant waiting list who had at least one potential HLAi living donor, from which 203 DSA + XM- pairs were identified and outcomes analysed.
Results
Out of 203 patients, 96 (47.3%) received a LD transplant: 52/96 (54.2%) a LDi, and 44/96 (45.8%) an alternative compatible LD. In addition, 107 patients out of 203(52.7%) waited for a DDc, of which 47(43.9%) were subsequently transplanted. Our adjusted analysis showed that the LDi transplantation did not offer a superior patient survival over waiting for a DDc transplant. For those transplanted, there was no difference in patient (p = 0.065) or death censored allograft survival (p = 0.37) between DDc and LDi recipients. However, there was a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection (p = 0.043) and antibody-mediated rejection (p = 0.005) in the LDi group. Having a high pre-transplant calculated reaction frequency and preformed DSA to both class I and class II antigens were associated with inferior outcomes in the LDi transplants.
Conclusions
Given the lack of difference in allograft survival between LDi and DDc transplants, in the absence of an alternative compatible living donor, proceeding with a LDi should be supported despite a higher rejection risk, providing individual risk assessment and shared decision making is undertaken.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Immunology will publish up-to-date information on all aspects of the broad field it encompasses. The journal will be directed at (basic) scientists, tissue typers, transplant physicians and surgeons, and research and data on all immunological aspects of organ-, tissue- and (haematopoietic) stem cell transplantation are of potential interest to the readers of Transplant Immunology. Original papers, Review articles and Hypotheses will be considered for publication and submitted manuscripts will be rapidly peer-reviewed and published. They will be judged on the basis of scientific merit, originality, timeliness and quality.