头皮过敏性接触性皮炎:对一种诊断不足的病症的回顾。

Q2 Medicine International Journal of Women''s Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/JW9.0000000000000167
Jonathan C Hwang, Colleen J Beatty, Kuzma Khobzei, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya
{"title":"头皮过敏性接触性皮炎:对一种诊断不足的病症的回顾。","authors":"Jonathan C Hwang, Colleen J Beatty, Kuzma Khobzei, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya","doi":"10.1097/JW9.0000000000000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is hypothesized that scalp allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in women is commonly mistaken for other disorders due to overlapping symptoms and unique clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study reviews the potential underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of scalp ACD and explores ways to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted an extensive literature review to identify diagnostic challenges, common misdiagnoses, and diagnostic approaches for scalp ACD, focusing on standard versus targeted patch testing techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scalp ACD, often misdiagnosed as seborrheic dermatitis due to similar symptoms, has atypical presentations such as hair thinning, hair loss, and erythematous lesions affecting neighboring regions. Trichoscopy can help distinguish scalp ACD, identifying its patchy distribution of thin white scales, in contrast to the yellow scaling of seborrheic dermatitis. Standardized patch testing further contributes to diagnostic errors, with a study reporting 83% of patients who tested negative with standardized patch tests were positive when using their personal products. Individualized patch testing is more effective in identifying causative allergens and accurately diagnosing scalp ACD.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>It is a retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several factors contribute to scalp ACD's misdiagnosis for conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis. The significant discrepancy in ACD detection rates between personalized and standardized patch tests in women emphasizes the importance of using patient-specific products in diagnostic testing. Incorporating scalp ACD more readily into one's differential, employing individualized patch testing with trichoscopy, and accounting for neighboring symptomatic areas are all crucial elements in improving diagnostic accuracy for scalp ACD in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":53478,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology","volume":"10 3","pages":"e167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergic contact dermatitis of the scalp: a review of an underdiagnosed entity.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan C Hwang, Colleen J Beatty, Kuzma Khobzei, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JW9.0000000000000167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is hypothesized that scalp allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in women is commonly mistaken for other disorders due to overlapping symptoms and unique clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study reviews the potential underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of scalp ACD and explores ways to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted an extensive literature review to identify diagnostic challenges, common misdiagnoses, and diagnostic approaches for scalp ACD, focusing on standard versus targeted patch testing techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scalp ACD, often misdiagnosed as seborrheic dermatitis due to similar symptoms, has atypical presentations such as hair thinning, hair loss, and erythematous lesions affecting neighboring regions. Trichoscopy can help distinguish scalp ACD, identifying its patchy distribution of thin white scales, in contrast to the yellow scaling of seborrheic dermatitis. Standardized patch testing further contributes to diagnostic errors, with a study reporting 83% of patients who tested negative with standardized patch tests were positive when using their personal products. Individualized patch testing is more effective in identifying causative allergens and accurately diagnosing scalp ACD.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>It is a retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several factors contribute to scalp ACD's misdiagnosis for conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis. The significant discrepancy in ACD detection rates between personalized and standardized patch tests in women emphasizes the importance of using patient-specific products in diagnostic testing. Incorporating scalp ACD more readily into one's differential, employing individualized patch testing with trichoscopy, and accounting for neighboring symptomatic areas are all crucial elements in improving diagnostic accuracy for scalp ACD in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"e167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women''s Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据推测,由于症状重叠和独特的临床表现,女性头皮过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)常被误诊为其他疾病:本研究回顾了头皮过敏性接触性皮炎的潜在漏诊和误诊情况,并探讨了提高诊断准确性的方法:本研究进行了广泛的文献综述,以确定头皮 ACD 的诊断难题、常见误诊和诊断方法,重点关注标准贴片测试技术与针对性贴片测试技术:头皮ACD常因症状相似而被误诊为脂溢性皮炎,其表现不典型,如头发稀疏、脱发和影响邻近区域的红斑皮损。三腔镜检查可帮助鉴别头皮ACD,识别其斑块状分布的薄白色鳞屑,与脂溢性皮炎的黄色鳞屑形成鲜明对比。标准化斑贴测试进一步导致了诊断错误,一项研究报告显示,83% 的患者在接受标准化斑贴测试时检测结果为阴性,但在使用其个人产品时检测结果却为阳性。个体化斑贴测试能更有效地识别致敏原,准确诊断头皮ACD:局限性:这是一项回顾性研究:导致头皮ACD被误诊为脂溢性皮炎等疾病的因素有很多。在女性中,个性化贴片测试与标准化贴片测试在 ACD 检测率上存在明显差异,这强调了在诊断测试中使用患者专用产品的重要性。将头皮 ACD 更容易地纳入鉴别诊断中、使用个体化斑贴试验和三镜检查以及考虑邻近症状区域都是提高女性头皮 ACD 诊断准确性的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allergic contact dermatitis of the scalp: a review of an underdiagnosed entity.

Background: It is hypothesized that scalp allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in women is commonly mistaken for other disorders due to overlapping symptoms and unique clinical presentations.

Objective: This study reviews the potential underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of scalp ACD and explores ways to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: This study conducted an extensive literature review to identify diagnostic challenges, common misdiagnoses, and diagnostic approaches for scalp ACD, focusing on standard versus targeted patch testing techniques.

Results: Scalp ACD, often misdiagnosed as seborrheic dermatitis due to similar symptoms, has atypical presentations such as hair thinning, hair loss, and erythematous lesions affecting neighboring regions. Trichoscopy can help distinguish scalp ACD, identifying its patchy distribution of thin white scales, in contrast to the yellow scaling of seborrheic dermatitis. Standardized patch testing further contributes to diagnostic errors, with a study reporting 83% of patients who tested negative with standardized patch tests were positive when using their personal products. Individualized patch testing is more effective in identifying causative allergens and accurately diagnosing scalp ACD.

Limitations: It is a retrospective review.

Conclusion: Several factors contribute to scalp ACD's misdiagnosis for conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis. The significant discrepancy in ACD detection rates between personalized and standardized patch tests in women emphasizes the importance of using patient-specific products in diagnostic testing. Incorporating scalp ACD more readily into one's differential, employing individualized patch testing with trichoscopy, and accounting for neighboring symptomatic areas are all crucial elements in improving diagnostic accuracy for scalp ACD in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJWD publishes articles pertaining to dermatologic medical, surgical and cosmetic issues faced by female patients and their families. We are interested in original research articles, review articles, unusual case reports, new treatments, clinical trials, education, mentorship and viewpoint articles. Articles dealing with ethical issues in dermatology and medical legal scenarios are also welcome.Very important articles will have accompanying editorials. Topics which our subsections editors look forward to welcoming include: Women’s Health Oncology, Surgery and Aesthetics Pediatric Dermatology Medical Dermatology Society.
期刊最新文献
Need for individualized counseling regarding psoriasis systemic therapy in women of childbearing age: analysis of the PsoFem study at the University Medical Center Hamburg. Case reports on hand prejuvenation: clinical outcomes in middle-aged women with hyaluronic acid filler plus lidocaine. Clinical and demographic characteristics of frontal fibrosing alopecia in a dermatology referral center in Bogota, Colombia: a descriptive cross-sectional study. What do you need to know when preparing to give a talk at an international dermatology conference? Insights and practical recommendations. Botulinum toxin treatment of refractory vaginismus: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1