与学习使用辅助和替代性交流(AAC)的学生打交道的辅助教育工作者的专业网络和自我效能感

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1177/15407969241265971
Elizabeth E. Biggs, J. Bumble, Rebecca E. Hacker, Kendra E. Scotti, Caitlin E. Cushing
{"title":"与学习使用辅助和替代性交流(AAC)的学生打交道的辅助教育工作者的专业网络和自我效能感","authors":"Elizabeth E. Biggs, J. Bumble, Rebecca E. Hacker, Kendra E. Scotti, Caitlin E. Cushing","doi":"10.1177/15407969241265971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paraeducators often work with special education teachers and school teams to support students with disabilities who have complex communication needs (CCN), including students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) such as speech-generating devices. This study involved surveying 258 paraeducators working with students with disabilities who had CCN (grades PreK–12, along with community-based transition classrooms). Social network analysis was used to examine paraeducators’ professional networks and collaboration patterns, along with how paraeducator professional network size related to their self-efficacy beliefs about working with students with CCN. Findings revealed wide variability in the size and function of paraeducators’ professional networks and their self-efficacy beliefs. Paraeducators generally reported few mutual collaborative relationships with other professionals, receiving support more than they gave support. Many had small networks with few trusted collaborators. Paraeducators’ network size was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy beliefs, beyond their personal characteristics and whether they received AAC-related training. This study informs future research and practice by underscoring the need for paraeducators to work within well-connected teams, and by revealing ways social network analysis can be used to examine issues related to self-efficacy and collaboration.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Networks and Self-Efficacy of Paraeducators Working with Students with Learning to Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth E. Biggs, J. Bumble, Rebecca E. Hacker, Kendra E. Scotti, Caitlin E. Cushing\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15407969241265971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paraeducators often work with special education teachers and school teams to support students with disabilities who have complex communication needs (CCN), including students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) such as speech-generating devices. This study involved surveying 258 paraeducators working with students with disabilities who had CCN (grades PreK–12, along with community-based transition classrooms). Social network analysis was used to examine paraeducators’ professional networks and collaboration patterns, along with how paraeducator professional network size related to their self-efficacy beliefs about working with students with CCN. Findings revealed wide variability in the size and function of paraeducators’ professional networks and their self-efficacy beliefs. Paraeducators generally reported few mutual collaborative relationships with other professionals, receiving support more than they gave support. Many had small networks with few trusted collaborators. Paraeducators’ network size was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy beliefs, beyond their personal characteristics and whether they received AAC-related training. This study informs future research and practice by underscoring the need for paraeducators to work within well-connected teams, and by revealing ways social network analysis can be used to examine issues related to self-efficacy and collaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241265971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241265971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助教育工作者经常与特殊教育教师和学校团队合作,为有复杂交流需求(CCN)的残疾学生提供支持,包括使用语言生成设备等辅助和替代性交流(AAC)的学生。本研究调查了 258 名为有 CCN 的残疾学生(学前班至 12 年级,以及社区过渡教室)提供服务的辅助教育工作者。研究采用社会网络分析的方法,考察了辅助教育工作者的专业网络和合作模式,以及辅助教育工作者的专业网络规模与他们在与有 CCN 的学生合作时的自我效能信念之间的关系。研究结果显示,辅助教育工作者专业网络的规模和功能以及他们的自我效能信念存在很大差异。辅助教育工作者普遍报告说,他们与其他专业人员之间的相互合作关系很少,接受的支持多于给予的支持。许多人的网络规模较小,可信赖的合作者很少。除了个人特征和是否接受过与 AAC 相关的培训之外,辅助教育工作者的网络规模是自我效能感信念的最强预测因素。这项研究强调了辅助教育工作者需要在联系紧密的团队中工作,并揭示了社会网络分析可用于研究自我效能感和协作相关问题的方法,从而为未来的研究和实践提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Professional Networks and Self-Efficacy of Paraeducators Working with Students with Learning to Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
Paraeducators often work with special education teachers and school teams to support students with disabilities who have complex communication needs (CCN), including students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) such as speech-generating devices. This study involved surveying 258 paraeducators working with students with disabilities who had CCN (grades PreK–12, along with community-based transition classrooms). Social network analysis was used to examine paraeducators’ professional networks and collaboration patterns, along with how paraeducator professional network size related to their self-efficacy beliefs about working with students with CCN. Findings revealed wide variability in the size and function of paraeducators’ professional networks and their self-efficacy beliefs. Paraeducators generally reported few mutual collaborative relationships with other professionals, receiving support more than they gave support. Many had small networks with few trusted collaborators. Paraeducators’ network size was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy beliefs, beyond their personal characteristics and whether they received AAC-related training. This study informs future research and practice by underscoring the need for paraeducators to work within well-connected teams, and by revealing ways social network analysis can be used to examine issues related to self-efficacy and collaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Teacher-Implemented Modified Schema-Based Instruction with Middle-Grade Students with Autism and Intellectual Disability.” A Call to Action: Extending the Research on Trauma Assessment and Treatment for Children With Intellectual Disabilities and Extensive Support Needs Experiences of Elementary Students with Complex Support Needs in Segregated Special Education Classrooms: A Mixed Methods Study Students Educated With Alternate Curriculum in Elementary School: Timing, Switching, and Educational Placements Educators’ Perceptions on the Involvement of Students With Complex Support Needs in PBIS: The Role of Educational Placement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1