燃料市场的竞争和消费者价格:一个欧盟小国的启示

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Applied Economic Analysis Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1108/aea-08-2023-0322
J. Dolšak
{"title":"燃料市场的竞争和消费者价格:一个欧盟小国的启示","authors":"J. Dolšak","doi":"10.1108/aea-08-2023-0322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyse the effect of competition on retail fuel prices in a small European Union (EU) country with high market concentration.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe researchers use a panel data set to estimate a fuel price equation that includes supply and demand factors as well as time-fixed effects.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study finds that more competitors in the local market decrease prices, whereas the high market share of oligopoly brands does not condition this effect. Additionally, independent brands set lower prices than wholesalers, and gas stations located near the borders of almost all neighbouring countries are associated with higher prices.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study suggests that Slovenia’s retail fuel market maintains competitive pricing despite high oligopolistic shares because of historical regulatory influences that shaped firm behaviour and pricing strategies, along with geographical and economic factors such as Slovenia’s role as a transit country. External competitive pressures from neighbouring countries and high levels of traffic, combined with the remnants of regulatory structures, help prevent market abuses and keep fuel prices lower than in other EU countries.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIt also indicates that policy should encourage fiercer competition in the local market by increasing the density of gas stations, especially from independent brands.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese findings may be associated with specific country characteristics. This paper introduces unique findings that shed light on the impact of a small market on competition, with a particular focus on highlighting the effect of oligopolistic brands.\n","PeriodicalId":36191,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition and consumer prices in the fuel market: insights from a small EU country\",\"authors\":\"J. Dolšak\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aea-08-2023-0322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to analyse the effect of competition on retail fuel prices in a small European Union (EU) country with high market concentration.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe researchers use a panel data set to estimate a fuel price equation that includes supply and demand factors as well as time-fixed effects.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study finds that more competitors in the local market decrease prices, whereas the high market share of oligopoly brands does not condition this effect. Additionally, independent brands set lower prices than wholesalers, and gas stations located near the borders of almost all neighbouring countries are associated with higher prices.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study suggests that Slovenia’s retail fuel market maintains competitive pricing despite high oligopolistic shares because of historical regulatory influences that shaped firm behaviour and pricing strategies, along with geographical and economic factors such as Slovenia’s role as a transit country. External competitive pressures from neighbouring countries and high levels of traffic, combined with the remnants of regulatory structures, help prevent market abuses and keep fuel prices lower than in other EU countries.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nIt also indicates that policy should encourage fiercer competition in the local market by increasing the density of gas stations, especially from independent brands.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThese findings may be associated with specific country characteristics. This paper introduces unique findings that shed light on the impact of a small market on competition, with a particular focus on highlighting the effect of oligopolistic brands.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-08-2023-0322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-08-2023-0322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究结果研究发现,当地市场上的竞争者越多,价格越低,而寡头垄断品牌的市场份额越高,价格越低。此外,独立品牌的价格低于批发商,而位于几乎所有邻国边境附近的加油站价格较高。研究局限性/启示研究表明,尽管寡头垄断份额较高,但斯洛文尼亚的零售燃料市场仍保持着竞争性定价,这是因为历史上的监管影响塑造了企业行为和定价策略,同时还有地理和经济因素,如斯洛文尼亚作为过境国的角色。来自邻国的外部竞争压力和高水平的交通量,再加上残余的监管结构,有助于防止市场滥用,并使燃油价格低于其他欧盟国家。本文引入了独特的研究结果,揭示了小市场对竞争的影响,并特别强调了寡头品牌的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competition and consumer prices in the fuel market: insights from a small EU country
Purpose This study aims to analyse the effect of competition on retail fuel prices in a small European Union (EU) country with high market concentration. Design/methodology/approach The researchers use a panel data set to estimate a fuel price equation that includes supply and demand factors as well as time-fixed effects. Findings The study finds that more competitors in the local market decrease prices, whereas the high market share of oligopoly brands does not condition this effect. Additionally, independent brands set lower prices than wholesalers, and gas stations located near the borders of almost all neighbouring countries are associated with higher prices. Research limitations/implications The study suggests that Slovenia’s retail fuel market maintains competitive pricing despite high oligopolistic shares because of historical regulatory influences that shaped firm behaviour and pricing strategies, along with geographical and economic factors such as Slovenia’s role as a transit country. External competitive pressures from neighbouring countries and high levels of traffic, combined with the remnants of regulatory structures, help prevent market abuses and keep fuel prices lower than in other EU countries. Practical implications It also indicates that policy should encourage fiercer competition in the local market by increasing the density of gas stations, especially from independent brands. Originality/value These findings may be associated with specific country characteristics. This paper introduces unique findings that shed light on the impact of a small market on competition, with a particular focus on highlighting the effect of oligopolistic brands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economic Analysis
Applied Economic Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of regional factors on energy poverty Competition and consumer prices in the fuel market: insights from a small EU country Childcare restrictions and gender gap in labor outcomes What else? Immigrant–native cohorts entering the labour market under a context of adverse shocks: the great recession and COVID-19 Decarbonisation at least cost: an analysis of the optimal portfolio of instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1