社区老年人群中的 "肌肉疏松症 "和 "虚弱症":观察研究

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_23
Nalina Gupta, Palani G. Kumar, Divya J. Patel
{"title":"社区老年人群中的 \"肌肉疏松症 \"和 \"虚弱症\":观察研究","authors":"Nalina Gupta, Palani G. Kumar, Divya J. Patel","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n There are few studies on the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in India.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study was to assess sarcopenia and frailty using simple clinical tools among the elderly population in the community.\n \n \n \n This was an observational study. The elderly population with an age group of >60 years residing in villages within 10–15 km of Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, formed the sampling frame of the study.\n \n \n \n A total of 785 participants were approached, of whom 556 were included in the study based on inclusion criteria. Participants were assessed for grip strength, muscle mass, gait speed, and frailty.\n \n \n \n The data were analyzed using STATA-IC statistical software version 13. A nonparametric Chi-square (χ2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the difference between various variables. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (CI).\n \n \n \n Based on the Indian criteria, 205 participants (36.1%) were diagnosed as having sarcopenia, and 351 participants (63%) were diagnosed as having “no sarcopenia.” 5.6% of participants were found to be frail, 19.2% to be pre-frailty, and 75.2% to be no frailty. The χ2 analysis showed a significant association of sarcopenia with gender and different age groups (P value < 0.001).\n \n \n \n In this study, 36.9% of the elderly participants were found to have “sarcopenia,” and 5.6% of the participants had frailty. Simple clinical tools used were easy to administer and suitable for field screening.\n","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenia and frailty among the elderly population in the community: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"Nalina Gupta, Palani G. Kumar, Divya J. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n There are few studies on the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in India.\\n \\n \\n \\n The aim of this study was to assess sarcopenia and frailty using simple clinical tools among the elderly population in the community.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was an observational study. The elderly population with an age group of >60 years residing in villages within 10–15 km of Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, formed the sampling frame of the study.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 785 participants were approached, of whom 556 were included in the study based on inclusion criteria. Participants were assessed for grip strength, muscle mass, gait speed, and frailty.\\n \\n \\n \\n The data were analyzed using STATA-IC statistical software version 13. A nonparametric Chi-square (χ2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the difference between various variables. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (CI).\\n \\n \\n \\n Based on the Indian criteria, 205 participants (36.1%) were diagnosed as having sarcopenia, and 351 participants (63%) were diagnosed as having “no sarcopenia.” 5.6% of participants were found to be frail, 19.2% to be pre-frailty, and 75.2% to be no frailty. The χ2 analysis showed a significant association of sarcopenia with gender and different age groups (P value < 0.001).\\n \\n \\n \\n In this study, 36.9% of the elderly participants were found to have “sarcopenia,” and 5.6% of the participants had frailty. Simple clinical tools used were easy to administer and suitable for field screening.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 关于印度肌肉疏松症和虚弱症患病率的研究很少。 本研究旨在使用简单的临床工具评估社区老年人群中的肌肉疏松症和虚弱症。 这是一项观察性研究。居住在瓦多达拉 Sumandeep Vidyapeeth 10-15 公里范围内村庄的 60 岁以上老年人口构成了研究的抽样框架。 共接触了 785 名参与者,其中 556 人根据纳入标准被纳入研究。研究人员对参与者的握力、肌肉质量、步速和虚弱程度进行了评估。 数据使用 STATA-IC 统计软件 13 版进行分析。对分类变量采用非参数卡方(χ2)检验,对不同变量之间的差异采用独立样本 t 检验。统计显著性以 P < 0.05 为标准,置信区间为 95%。 根据印度标准,205 名参与者(36.1%)被诊断为患有肌肉疏松症,351 名参与者(63%)被诊断为 "无肌肉疏松症"。5.6%的参与者体质虚弱,19.2%为体质虚弱前期,75.2%为无体质虚弱。χ2分析显示,肌肉疏松症与性别和不同年龄组别有明显的关联(P值<0.001)。 本研究发现,36.9% 的老年参与者患有 "肌肉疏松症",5.6% 的参与者患有虚弱症。研究采用的临床工具简单易用,适合实地筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sarcopenia and frailty among the elderly population in the community: An observational study
ABSTRACT There are few studies on the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in India. The aim of this study was to assess sarcopenia and frailty using simple clinical tools among the elderly population in the community. This was an observational study. The elderly population with an age group of >60 years residing in villages within 10–15 km of Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, formed the sampling frame of the study. A total of 785 participants were approached, of whom 556 were included in the study based on inclusion criteria. Participants were assessed for grip strength, muscle mass, gait speed, and frailty. The data were analyzed using STATA-IC statistical software version 13. A nonparametric Chi-square (χ2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the difference between various variables. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Based on the Indian criteria, 205 participants (36.1%) were diagnosed as having sarcopenia, and 351 participants (63%) were diagnosed as having “no sarcopenia.” 5.6% of participants were found to be frail, 19.2% to be pre-frailty, and 75.2% to be no frailty. The χ2 analysis showed a significant association of sarcopenia with gender and different age groups (P value < 0.001). In this study, 36.9% of the elderly participants were found to have “sarcopenia,” and 5.6% of the participants had frailty. Simple clinical tools used were easy to administer and suitable for field screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cultural practices and beliefs followed for new born care in Santhal pargana - A cross sectional study. Effect of mindfulness-based intervention on perceived stress among breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Family medicine viewed through the public lens: A national cross-sectional study in Lebanon. Medical complications in pregnancy. Mental health and well-being amongst adolescents in today's times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1