{"title":"印度最高法院对雀巢案的裁决与静态解释--分析","authors":"K. Prakash","doi":"10.59403/vgsjxz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article takes a look at the recent ruling of the Supreme Court of India in Assessing Officer v. Nestle SA (Nestle) which deliberated the right to invoke the most favoured nation (MFN) clause in a tax treaty and whether such an MFN clause is automatically invoked once notified or if a further notification is required. The article provides an overview of the Nestle case and the fresh arguments put forth by the taxpayer in the petition challenging the decision and critically analyses the two issues deliberated.","PeriodicalId":517533,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Indian Supreme Court’s Ruling in Nestle and the Static Interpretation – An Analysis\",\"authors\":\"K. Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.59403/vgsjxz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article takes a look at the recent ruling of the Supreme Court of India in Assessing Officer v. Nestle SA (Nestle) which deliberated the right to invoke the most favoured nation (MFN) clause in a tax treaty and whether such an MFN clause is automatically invoked once notified or if a further notification is required. The article provides an overview of the Nestle case and the fresh arguments put forth by the taxpayer in the petition challenging the decision and critically analyses the two issues deliberated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59403/vgsjxz\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59403/vgsjxz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Indian Supreme Court’s Ruling in Nestle and the Static Interpretation – An Analysis
This article takes a look at the recent ruling of the Supreme Court of India in Assessing Officer v. Nestle SA (Nestle) which deliberated the right to invoke the most favoured nation (MFN) clause in a tax treaty and whether such an MFN clause is automatically invoked once notified or if a further notification is required. The article provides an overview of the Nestle case and the fresh arguments put forth by the taxpayer in the petition challenging the decision and critically analyses the two issues deliberated.