日间人工尿道括约肌治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁:对比试验研究

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/bco2.412
Konstantinos Kapriniotis, Ioannis Loufopoulos, Richard Nobrega, Anthony Noah, Helena Gresty, Tamsin Greenwell, Jeremy Ockrim
{"title":"日间人工尿道括约肌治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁:对比试验研究","authors":"Konstantinos Kapriniotis,&nbsp;Ioannis Loufopoulos,&nbsp;Richard Nobrega,&nbsp;Anthony Noah,&nbsp;Helena Gresty,&nbsp;Tamsin Greenwell,&nbsp;Jeremy Ockrim","doi":"10.1002/bco2.412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) has been traditionally offered with an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this prospective, comparative pilot study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of the AUS procedure in a day-case setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included consecutive patients having primary or redo AUS surgery over an 18-month period. We excluded patients with previous urethral erosion of AUS, urethroplasty or high anaesthetic risk. All patients were offered day-case surgery. Patients who declined or could not have day-case surgery for logistical reasons had standard care with overnight stay and formed the control group for the study. Primary outcome was the proportion of successful same day-discharges in the day-case group. We also compared baseline characteristics, complications and continence at 1 year post surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve patients consented for day-case procedure, and 13 patients had standard overnight care. Mean age was 69.5 years (range 58–79). Twenty-one patients (84%) had primary AUS, whereas 4 (16%) had a redo procedure. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline demographics. Median number of pads/24 h was 5 in the day-case group and 4 in the overnight group. Eight of 12 patients (66.7%) in the day-case group were successfully discharged on the same day. Failed discharges were due to anaesthetic recovery (<i>n</i> = 2), high post-void residuals that resolved spontaneously (<i>n</i> = 1) and intraoperative superficial urethral injury (<i>n</i> = 1). All patients in the day-case group and all but one in the standard of care group were socially continent (0–1 pads) at 1 year post procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Day-case catheter-free discharge of AUS patients is feasible and safe in selected patients with comparable continence outcomes and complication rates to those with standard overnight stays.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 9","pages":"845-850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day-case artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A comparative pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Kapriniotis,&nbsp;Ioannis Loufopoulos,&nbsp;Richard Nobrega,&nbsp;Anthony Noah,&nbsp;Helena Gresty,&nbsp;Tamsin Greenwell,&nbsp;Jeremy Ockrim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) has been traditionally offered with an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this prospective, comparative pilot study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of the AUS procedure in a day-case setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included consecutive patients having primary or redo AUS surgery over an 18-month period. We excluded patients with previous urethral erosion of AUS, urethroplasty or high anaesthetic risk. All patients were offered day-case surgery. Patients who declined or could not have day-case surgery for logistical reasons had standard care with overnight stay and formed the control group for the study. Primary outcome was the proportion of successful same day-discharges in the day-case group. We also compared baseline characteristics, complications and continence at 1 year post surgery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve patients consented for day-case procedure, and 13 patients had standard overnight care. Mean age was 69.5 years (range 58–79). Twenty-one patients (84%) had primary AUS, whereas 4 (16%) had a redo procedure. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline demographics. Median number of pads/24 h was 5 in the day-case group and 4 in the overnight group. Eight of 12 patients (66.7%) in the day-case group were successfully discharged on the same day. Failed discharges were due to anaesthetic recovery (<i>n</i> = 2), high post-void residuals that resolved spontaneously (<i>n</i> = 1) and intraoperative superficial urethral injury (<i>n</i> = 1). All patients in the day-case group and all but one in the standard of care group were socially continent (0–1 pads) at 1 year post procedure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Day-case catheter-free discharge of AUS patients is feasible and safe in selected patients with comparable continence outcomes and complication rates to those with standard overnight stays.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"845-850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.412\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植入人工尿道括约肌(AUS)治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)的传统方法是住院一晚。这项前瞻性比较试验研究旨在评估日间病例环境下人工尿道括约肌手术的可行性和效果。我们排除了曾接受过 AUS 尿道侵蚀、尿道成形术或高麻醉风险的患者。所有患者均可接受日间手术。因后勤原因拒绝或无法接受日间手术的患者接受了标准护理,并留院过夜,他们构成了本研究的对照组。研究的主要结果是日间手术组当天成功出院的比例。我们还比较了基线特征、并发症和术后一年的尿失禁情况。平均年龄为 69.5 岁(58-79 岁不等)。21名患者(84%)接受了初次AUS手术,4名患者(16%)接受了再次手术。两组患者的基线人口统计学特征无明显差异。日间手术组每 24 小时尿垫中位数为 5 个,隔夜手术组为 4 个。日间手术组的 12 名患者中有 8 名(66.7%)在当天顺利出院。失败出院的原因包括麻醉恢复(2 例)、排尿后残余物较多但自行消退(1 例)和术中浅表尿道损伤(1 例)。日间手术组的所有患者和标准护理组的所有患者(除1人外)在术后1年都实现了社会性尿失禁(0-1个尿垫)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Day-case artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A comparative pilot study

Objectives

Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) has been traditionally offered with an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this prospective, comparative pilot study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of the AUS procedure in a day-case setting.

Patients and methods

We included consecutive patients having primary or redo AUS surgery over an 18-month period. We excluded patients with previous urethral erosion of AUS, urethroplasty or high anaesthetic risk. All patients were offered day-case surgery. Patients who declined or could not have day-case surgery for logistical reasons had standard care with overnight stay and formed the control group for the study. Primary outcome was the proportion of successful same day-discharges in the day-case group. We also compared baseline characteristics, complications and continence at 1 year post surgery.

Results

Twelve patients consented for day-case procedure, and 13 patients had standard overnight care. Mean age was 69.5 years (range 58–79). Twenty-one patients (84%) had primary AUS, whereas 4 (16%) had a redo procedure. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline demographics. Median number of pads/24 h was 5 in the day-case group and 4 in the overnight group. Eight of 12 patients (66.7%) in the day-case group were successfully discharged on the same day. Failed discharges were due to anaesthetic recovery (n = 2), high post-void residuals that resolved spontaneously (n = 1) and intraoperative superficial urethral injury (n = 1). All patients in the day-case group and all but one in the standard of care group were socially continent (0–1 pads) at 1 year post procedure.

Conclusion

Day-case catheter-free discharge of AUS patients is feasible and safe in selected patients with comparable continence outcomes and complication rates to those with standard overnight stays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing cancer prostate following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer Understanding the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer outcomes: 12-Month follow-up data from the international, prospective COVIDSurg Cancer study Treatment preferences of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: A discrete choice experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1