Honggang Mi, Yunan Liang, Qiang Sun, Chao Wei, Hongwei Song, Quanying Zhang, Ningchao Li, Xin Nie
{"title":"螺旋钻孔放射性测井响应模拟研究","authors":"Honggang Mi, Yunan Liang, Qiang Sun, Chao Wei, Hongwei Song, Quanying Zhang, Ningchao Li, Xin Nie","doi":"10.1093/jge/gxae078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The spiral borehole, primarily attributed to uneven force on the drill bit, poses a unique drilling and well logging challenge. In certain logging applications, this phenomenon can disrupt logging responses, introducing periodic fluctuations in the logging curve and complicating the interpretation process. To elucidate the impact of the spiral-borehole phenomenon on conventional radioactive logging methods, we conducted a simulation study examining its effects on traditional density tool (GGD), thermal-neutron porosity tool (TNP), and natural gamma tool (GR). Our findings reveal significant influences on density and porosity tool responses, with the amplitude of periodic fluctuations in logging curves closely linked to the groove depth of the spiral borehole. Conversely, the natural gamma tool exhibits minimal impact, with noticeable spiral-borehole effects causing limited fluctuations. Additionally, when the groove depth of the spiral borehole is fixed, the smaller the distance between the logging tool and the well wall, the closer the value obtained by the logging tool is to the true value of the formation parameter, and vice versa. This research offers theoretical insights for effectively correcting spiral-borehole effects in radioactive logging methods.","PeriodicalId":54820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation study on the radioactive logging responses in the spiral borehole\",\"authors\":\"Honggang Mi, Yunan Liang, Qiang Sun, Chao Wei, Hongwei Song, Quanying Zhang, Ningchao Li, Xin Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jge/gxae078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The spiral borehole, primarily attributed to uneven force on the drill bit, poses a unique drilling and well logging challenge. In certain logging applications, this phenomenon can disrupt logging responses, introducing periodic fluctuations in the logging curve and complicating the interpretation process. To elucidate the impact of the spiral-borehole phenomenon on conventional radioactive logging methods, we conducted a simulation study examining its effects on traditional density tool (GGD), thermal-neutron porosity tool (TNP), and natural gamma tool (GR). Our findings reveal significant influences on density and porosity tool responses, with the amplitude of periodic fluctuations in logging curves closely linked to the groove depth of the spiral borehole. Conversely, the natural gamma tool exhibits minimal impact, with noticeable spiral-borehole effects causing limited fluctuations. Additionally, when the groove depth of the spiral borehole is fixed, the smaller the distance between the logging tool and the well wall, the closer the value obtained by the logging tool is to the true value of the formation parameter, and vice versa. This research offers theoretical insights for effectively correcting spiral-borehole effects in radioactive logging methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simulation study on the radioactive logging responses in the spiral borehole
The spiral borehole, primarily attributed to uneven force on the drill bit, poses a unique drilling and well logging challenge. In certain logging applications, this phenomenon can disrupt logging responses, introducing periodic fluctuations in the logging curve and complicating the interpretation process. To elucidate the impact of the spiral-borehole phenomenon on conventional radioactive logging methods, we conducted a simulation study examining its effects on traditional density tool (GGD), thermal-neutron porosity tool (TNP), and natural gamma tool (GR). Our findings reveal significant influences on density and porosity tool responses, with the amplitude of periodic fluctuations in logging curves closely linked to the groove depth of the spiral borehole. Conversely, the natural gamma tool exhibits minimal impact, with noticeable spiral-borehole effects causing limited fluctuations. Additionally, when the groove depth of the spiral borehole is fixed, the smaller the distance between the logging tool and the well wall, the closer the value obtained by the logging tool is to the true value of the formation parameter, and vice versa. This research offers theoretical insights for effectively correcting spiral-borehole effects in radioactive logging methods.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering aims to promote research and developments in geophysics and related areas of engineering. It has a predominantly applied science and engineering focus, but solicits and accepts high-quality contributions in all earth-physics disciplines, including geodynamics, natural and controlled-source seismology, oil, gas and mineral exploration, petrophysics and reservoir geophysics. The journal covers those aspects of engineering that are closely related to geophysics, or on the targets and problems that geophysics addresses. Typically, this is engineering focused on the subsurface, particularly petroleum engineering, rock mechanics, geophysical software engineering, drilling technology, remote sensing, instrumentation and sensor design.