寻租还是创造价值?国有企业金字塔式的管理自主权对并购绩效的影响

Jiachun Chen, Qingsong Hou, Shanmin Li
{"title":"寻租还是创造价值?国有企业金字塔式的管理自主权对并购绩效的影响","authors":"Jiachun Chen, Qingsong Hou, Shanmin Li","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to give managers autonomy to improve organisational performance has long been a focus of business practice. In this paper, we use a unique Chinese context to investigate the effect of managerial autonomy arising from state‐built corporate pyramids on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) performance. We find that the number of pyramidal layers between the government and the state‐owned enterprise (SOE) is positively associated with M&A performance. This relationship is stronger when the SOE managers possess professional M&A abilities but weaker when the SOE management team and the government are politically connected. We attribute the positive association to the career path incentives of SOE managers. Additionally, we address the role of managerial autonomy in the M&A process and integration. We also analyse this effect in contexts where managerial autonomy is crucial in some investment decisions. Taken together, our study fills a critical gap on managerial discretion within internal organisational contexts.","PeriodicalId":335953,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":"52 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance\",\"authors\":\"Jiachun Chen, Qingsong Hou, Shanmin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acfi.13309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to give managers autonomy to improve organisational performance has long been a focus of business practice. In this paper, we use a unique Chinese context to investigate the effect of managerial autonomy arising from state‐built corporate pyramids on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) performance. We find that the number of pyramidal layers between the government and the state‐owned enterprise (SOE) is positively associated with M&A performance. This relationship is stronger when the SOE managers possess professional M&A abilities but weaker when the SOE management team and the government are politically connected. We attribute the positive association to the career path incentives of SOE managers. Additionally, we address the role of managerial autonomy in the M&A process and integration. We also analyse this effect in contexts where managerial autonomy is crucial in some investment decisions. Taken together, our study fills a critical gap on managerial discretion within internal organisational contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"volume\":\"52 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,如何赋予管理者自主权以提高组织绩效一直是商业实践的焦点。在本文中,我们利用独特的中国背景,研究了国家构建的企业金字塔所产生的管理自主权对并购(M&A)绩效的影响。我们发现,政府与国有企业之间的金字塔层级数量与并购绩效正相关。当国有企业管理者具备专业的并购能力时,这种关系更强;而当国有企业管理团队与政府之间存在政治关联时,这种关系较弱。我们将这种正相关关系归因于国有企业经理人的职业发展激励机制。此外,我们还探讨了管理自主权在并购过程和整合中的作用。我们还分析了管理自主权在某些投资决策中的关键作用。总之,我们的研究填补了有关内部组织背景下管理者自由裁量权的重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance
How to give managers autonomy to improve organisational performance has long been a focus of business practice. In this paper, we use a unique Chinese context to investigate the effect of managerial autonomy arising from state‐built corporate pyramids on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) performance. We find that the number of pyramidal layers between the government and the state‐owned enterprise (SOE) is positively associated with M&A performance. This relationship is stronger when the SOE managers possess professional M&A abilities but weaker when the SOE management team and the government are politically connected. We attribute the positive association to the career path incentives of SOE managers. Additionally, we address the role of managerial autonomy in the M&A process and integration. We also analyse this effect in contexts where managerial autonomy is crucial in some investment decisions. Taken together, our study fills a critical gap on managerial discretion within internal organisational contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keju tradition and major litigation cases: The persistent impact of Confucian norm standard The effect of government‐guided funds on target industries in development zones – Evidence from China Philanthropic forms of corporate social responsibility practices in a multinational company: Colonial and post‐colonial perspectives Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance Government procurement and zombie firms' productivity: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1