揭示临床相关性:调查提交组织学检查的胎盘及其与临床指征和组织学结果的相关性

Life Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.3390/life14080927
Luisa Strahler, Alex Horky, Stephan Spahn, Franz Bahlmann, Elise Gradhand
{"title":"揭示临床相关性:调查提交组织学检查的胎盘及其与临床指征和组织学结果的相关性","authors":"Luisa Strahler, Alex Horky, Stephan Spahn, Franz Bahlmann, Elise Gradhand","doi":"10.3390/life14080927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Germany, there is currently no official guideline for the submission of placentas for histopathological examination. Placentas are sent for histological examination by obstetricians according to locally defined indications, which leads to different practices in different centers. In this study, two cohorts of placentas were compared to assess the clinical relevance of placental examination. One cohort consisted of placentas with a clinical indication for histologic examination and the other of placentas with a clinically healthy pregnancy and a healthy infant. In this study, a placenta request form based on established international guidelines was used. Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with and without clinical indications were histopathologically examined. Clinical information was extracted from the request form and later correlated with histological findings. A total of 236 placentas were examined, including 127 (53.8%) with clinical indications and 109 (46.2%) without. The concordance between submission reasons and histopathological findings was higher in singleton pregnancies with clinical indications (90.9%) compared to twin pregnancies (62.97%). Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with clinical indications exhibited significantly more pathological findings than their respective healthy control groups. Histopathological examination of the placenta can confirm or reveal placenta pathologies and therefore improve the care of the mother, child and future pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"69 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling Clinical Relevance: Investigating Placentas Submitted for Histological Examination and Their Correlation with Clinical Indications and Histological Findings\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Strahler, Alex Horky, Stephan Spahn, Franz Bahlmann, Elise Gradhand\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/life14080927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Germany, there is currently no official guideline for the submission of placentas for histopathological examination. Placentas are sent for histological examination by obstetricians according to locally defined indications, which leads to different practices in different centers. In this study, two cohorts of placentas were compared to assess the clinical relevance of placental examination. One cohort consisted of placentas with a clinical indication for histologic examination and the other of placentas with a clinically healthy pregnancy and a healthy infant. In this study, a placenta request form based on established international guidelines was used. Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with and without clinical indications were histopathologically examined. Clinical information was extracted from the request form and later correlated with histological findings. A total of 236 placentas were examined, including 127 (53.8%) with clinical indications and 109 (46.2%) without. The concordance between submission reasons and histopathological findings was higher in singleton pregnancies with clinical indications (90.9%) compared to twin pregnancies (62.97%). Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with clinical indications exhibited significantly more pathological findings than their respective healthy control groups. Histopathological examination of the placenta can confirm or reveal placenta pathologies and therefore improve the care of the mother, child and future pregnancies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life\",\"volume\":\"69 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在德国,目前还没有关于胎盘组织病理学检查的官方指南。产科医生根据当地的适应症将胎盘送去进行组织学检查,这导致不同中心的做法各不相同。本研究比较了两组胎盘,以评估胎盘检查的临床意义。其中一组是有临床指征进行组织学检查的胎盘,另一组是临床健康妊娠和健康婴儿的胎盘。在这项研究中,使用的是基于既定国际指南的胎盘申请表。对有临床指征和无临床指征的单胎和双胎妊娠胎盘进行了组织病理学检查。临床信息从申请表中提取,随后与组织学结果进行关联。共检查了 236 例胎盘,其中 127 例(53.8%)有临床指征,109 例(46.2%)无临床指征。有临床指征的单胎妊娠(90.9%)与双胎妊娠(62.97%)相比,提交原因与组织病理学结果的一致性更高。有临床指征的单胎和双胎妊娠胎盘的病理结果明显多于各自的健康对照组。胎盘组织病理学检查可确认或揭示胎盘病变,从而改善对母亲、胎儿和未来妊娠的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling Clinical Relevance: Investigating Placentas Submitted for Histological Examination and Their Correlation with Clinical Indications and Histological Findings
In Germany, there is currently no official guideline for the submission of placentas for histopathological examination. Placentas are sent for histological examination by obstetricians according to locally defined indications, which leads to different practices in different centers. In this study, two cohorts of placentas were compared to assess the clinical relevance of placental examination. One cohort consisted of placentas with a clinical indication for histologic examination and the other of placentas with a clinically healthy pregnancy and a healthy infant. In this study, a placenta request form based on established international guidelines was used. Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with and without clinical indications were histopathologically examined. Clinical information was extracted from the request form and later correlated with histological findings. A total of 236 placentas were examined, including 127 (53.8%) with clinical indications and 109 (46.2%) without. The concordance between submission reasons and histopathological findings was higher in singleton pregnancies with clinical indications (90.9%) compared to twin pregnancies (62.97%). Placentas from singleton and twin pregnancies with clinical indications exhibited significantly more pathological findings than their respective healthy control groups. Histopathological examination of the placenta can confirm or reveal placenta pathologies and therefore improve the care of the mother, child and future pregnancies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized Management of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Vitreoretinopathy Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation in Preterm Infants: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment Effect of FluoRoquinolones on Aortic Growth, aortic stIffness and wave refLEctionS (FRAGILES study) Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Predict the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1